Debunked? We dismantled the original report back in 1990—it was riddled with mathematical and scientific errors from start to finish. We even found mathematical expressions that divided by zero. The computer models were no better, featuring absurd parameters like negative cloud cover and water that would not freeze. It was junk science through and through.
Debunked? We dismantled the original report back in 1990—it was riddled with mathematical and scientific errors from start to finish. We even found mathematical expressions that divided by zero. The computer models were no better, featuring absurd parameters like negative cloud cover and water that would not freeze. It was junk science through and through.
Debunked? We dismantled the original report back in 1990—it was riddled with mathematical and scientific errors from start to finish. We even found mathematical expressions that divided by zero. The computer models were no better, featuring absurd parameters like negative cloud cover and water that would not freeze. It was junk science through and through.