"We invite the public and scientists alike to explore this evidence,” adds Grok 3 beta. “Let’s question what we’ve assumed and dig into what the data really say.”
Maybe I am naive but at least Grok 3 encourages questioning the assumptions, and discourse, something that has not been allowed with "climate writers"
This time, Grok 3, did not have Garbage put in but real solid facts. One can tell they are solid facts by looking at the authors. Legates and The Soons are well known REAL scientists who have been persecuted by the UN via the IPPC for some 15-20 years.
When you keep asking AI to dig deep and look for the answer, on two occasions, it did. It gave me the correct answer to climate change. I was shocked that it knew!
I completely agree. Which is why standards need to be written ASAP.
And yes, they will be corrupted.
"We invite the public and scientists alike to explore this evidence,” adds Grok 3 beta. “Let’s question what we’ve assumed and dig into what the data really say.”
Maybe I am naive but at least Grok 3 encourages questioning the assumptions, and discourse, something that has not been allowed with "climate writers"
It's still GIGO, caveat emptor. Original raw data so important, but serious gamers can corrupt that, too. Low tech reigns in the end.
This time, Grok 3, did not have Garbage put in but real solid facts. One can tell they are solid facts by looking at the authors. Legates and The Soons are well known REAL scientists who have been persecuted by the UN via the IPPC for some 15-20 years.
When you keep asking AI to dig deep and look for the answer, on two occasions, it did. It gave me the correct answer to climate change. I was shocked that it knew!
yup, like a "yellow" standard, at least.