I would remind you that the COVID psyops campaign was far more effective in first world developed countries than in third world underdeveloped countries. Why? I don’t have a concise answer for that question.
My hunch is that people living in fully developed first world countries are used to having their lives largely d…
I would remind you that the COVID psyops campaign was far more effective in first world developed countries than in third world underdeveloped countries. Why? I don’t have a concise answer for that question.
My hunch is that people living in fully developed first world countries are used to having their lives largely directed by artificial hierarchical social infrastructures and constructed physical infrastructures that provide the conveniences that we depend on for our daily lives. We tend to accept those infrastructures as being natural and normal parts of our lives, never questioning the underlying basis for our lives. Our infrastructure sits in the background unseen and forgotten.
People in lesser developed nations tend to fend for themselves, hence they are not as reliant on artificial infrastructure to live their daily lives. They rely on direct contact with real people in their families and direct contact with real people in their communities for meeting their daily needs, a more natural organic infrastructure so to speak. They are less apt to be swayed by dark psyops campaigns waged by major institutions. It wouldn’t make any sense to them. It would seem weird to them how easily we fall victim to those campaigns which to them would appear to be obvious ploys to manipulate us.
Many people in 3rd world countries are less likely to own TVs, smartphones, radios, etc. Less access in general to the "media". That might have something to do with it too?
Interesting concept.
I would remind you that the COVID psyops campaign was far more effective in first world developed countries than in third world underdeveloped countries. Why? I don’t have a concise answer for that question.
My hunch is that people living in fully developed first world countries are used to having their lives largely directed by artificial hierarchical social infrastructures and constructed physical infrastructures that provide the conveniences that we depend on for our daily lives. We tend to accept those infrastructures as being natural and normal parts of our lives, never questioning the underlying basis for our lives. Our infrastructure sits in the background unseen and forgotten.
People in lesser developed nations tend to fend for themselves, hence they are not as reliant on artificial infrastructure to live their daily lives. They rely on direct contact with real people in their families and direct contact with real people in their communities for meeting their daily needs, a more natural organic infrastructure so to speak. They are less apt to be swayed by dark psyops campaigns waged by major institutions. It wouldn’t make any sense to them. It would seem weird to them how easily we fall victim to those campaigns which to them would appear to be obvious ploys to manipulate us.
Perhaps fewer have 100% 24/7 access to the blob's TV, news and radios spreading the fear and nudging.
Many people in 3rd world countries are less likely to own TVs, smartphones, radios, etc. Less access in general to the "media". That might have something to do with it too?
Absolutely!