115 Comments
тна Return to thread

"Safe and Effective"

was not a lie.

It was two lies.

Expand full comment

Just yesterday, I happened to be browsing the California Dept of Public Health website and noticed that the two safe and effective lies were repeated frequently and casually. "The COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective for everyone aged 6 months and older. Learn why the vaccine is one of our most powerful tools to ending the pandemic. Get your questions answered and find a walk-in clinic or book your appointment on My Turn today. Assistance is also available by calling (833) 422-4255. " Quite bold, yes? EVERYONE??? aged 6 months and older????? OMG.

Expand full comment

Let's get real here.

Remember:

If A=B and B=C, then A=C

Therefore

If (C) COVID shot produces = (S) Spike protein, and

The (S) Spike protein part of SARS-CoV-2 = (B) bioweapon,

then

(C) COVID shot= (B) bioweapon

Or to simplify:

If C=S and S=B then C=B

means:

COVID SHOT IS A BIOWEAPON!

Expand full comment

Thats insane! Ending the pandemic? How? Safe and Effective? They tested it on 8 mice! And I don't even think it was for safety! We HAVE TO STOP these psychopaths!

Expand full comment

The question is: WHY just 8 mice?

Perhapse because they knew the shots wouldn't work anyway, and lab-quality mice are expensive. Why waste money on more mice when they will just be wasted? After all, those 8 mice purportedly caught COVID anyway. "Vaccines" = complete flop!

Expand full comment

The jab really has become a holy sacrament of woke politics. When anyone questions the jab to these people, it is to question one of their deepest held ideological planks. It has nothing to do with medical safety for them and has everything to do with adhering to their political ideology. Talk about messed up. But that is where so many people are these days.

Expand full comment

Yes, and dumb people really are more likely to inadvertently remove themselves from the gene pool, as in the "Darwin Awards". It is just a fact of life. Sad, but true. The Dems were considerably more likely to have taken the bioweapon shots. Just by the difference in the numbers, it shows that they tended to be less discerning than more conservative types. Leftists are very different in other ways that matter, too. Like more inclined toward criminal behavior and less inclined to donate to charities, among others. They are free to be as irrational and stupid as they want, but they will be paying the price. Choices have consequences. It is just really too bad that they are also taking their children down with them.

Expand full comment

Indeed, the intrinsic value of human life is what is being systematically dismissed around us. And as the materialistic woke west suffers ever more painfully due to its unbased attitude, there will be a resurgence, an awakening of all. Toward an imperfect but less dystopian future. Hope and faith in the good senses of suffering folk will carry us forward. Or, failing this, a descent into a hell of our own making, a slavery reborn of government tyranny with its quest for more of those 2 most corruptible things. Money and power.

Expand full comment

Safe was a lie. But they were very effective in what they were intended to accomplish.

Expand full comment

What about "safe" in terms of safety for the deceivers? After all, consider the early claims of "coincidences," and consider the present claims of "We didn't know," and "It was an emergency, and we were following the science"? When you try and succeed in seeing the situation from the viewpoint of the deceivers, then what?

Expand full comment

God is blessing those who recognize the look of a lie. Or 2.

Expand full comment

It was your mistake for thinking of safe and effective in absolute terms. They were speaking the truth in relative terms compared to an undefined baseline.

Expand full comment

And shame on them for not expressing the safety and effectiveness in BOTH absolute and relative terms. If I'm recalling correctly, they are required to include both.

Expand full comment

How about three?=

"Safe"

"Effective"

"Safe AND effective"

Expand full comment

Or perhaps "safe" meant "plausible deniability" and "effective" referred to their messed up plan? We all know how the left is about mangling the meanings of words. Take the infamous "Lincoln Project" for instance. Most thought that group was named to follow in Lincoln's political footsteps. It was actually named to carry out a similar political assassination plot, albeit without the actual killing part.

Expand full comment

Your interpretation of both words, imho, is spot on.

Expand full comment
Error