Day 5 of my 17 year old granddaughter (and her family) visiting with us. It's hard not to get frustrated because she is onboard with vaccines (she had 2 covid shots and said she's fine), she wants to go to college to study to be an organic farmer (and help conquer climate change) and it's just generally hard to have a conversation with her. Reading this post was like medicine; it renewed my sanity.
The CO2Coalition shows higher CO2 has caused a greener planet and no rise in temps due to CO2. Teach yourself, then teach her.
What happens with more plant-life? You guessed correctly if you guessed a more moderate global climate with greater retention of carbonaceous material and water on land masses. The Leaf Area Index is reported to have grown by more than 40% with deserts being smaller.
There we go again , it is all about the money, who has the power to disperse it, who is going to benefit from it.
I remember when they put the surgeon generals warning label on all packages of cigarettes. I was a little girl. When my oldest two children were little they were at their grandma’s house. ( my ex husbands mother). She was a heavy smoker. She had just bought 2 cartons of cigarettes. Because of hearing the warning commercials about cigarettes they took grandma’s cigarettes and open each pack and broke up every cigarette. Needless to say Grandma was not happy. They told her that they didn’t want her to die from smoking cigarettes. She still was not happy. Even though we are totally against smoking we had the children earn money to pay grandma back for destroying her cigarettes. Then we had a lesson on agency.
Then it is an issue you cannot discuss today. Probably, few other areas either. Critical thinking begins early for some, later for others and for some, never.
Too early to tell where she falls. One must let human nature have its own pace of development.
Micheal, When I first read your post I felt a thud, but didn't pay much attention. But now that the day has wound down, it comes back to taunt me. (From someone who has seen abuse first hand to others. )This is a conundrum, because I believe in consequences and direction and guidance. But physical hitting, slapping, pushing, pinching, let alone punching is barbaric and unacceptable to me. One good hairbrush to the butt can leave a bruise, but that is the least of the damage. I know, you are talking about a swat, but that easily gives sway to more. I know...
Was something of a handful and mom never understood why an aunt always liked me to visit. Never sussed that the aunt had a humongous peach tree. We got along just fine
Fifteen percent of deserts have greened in the last 20 or so years. That’s a surface area the size of the United effin’ States.
Atmospheric CO2 is approximately 400 ppm - a famine for the “Gut Biome” of Gaia - plants. Greenhouses fertilize plants so that the CO2 concentration is 1,000 ppm.
Energy = work. The best thing for the environment - locally and globally - is to use fossil fuels to make poor countries rich as fast as possible. At some $5,000 per capitalism, people have enough capital and psychic breathing room to garden and make their environment sustainably safe.
Mark Steyn’s First Amendment defense and countersuit against Global Warmmonger Michael Mann (the fabulist behind the disappeared “Hockey Stick”) has entered its second decade and fourth judge. A judicial “Turtles all the Way Down” in favor of the Globalists.
Now the empirical Granddaddy question or two for the Warmmongers:
What is the Delta between the current Earth’s temperature and the Optimal Earth’s temperature. Why is that optimal? Show your work.
Hint: the question calls for a number and a unit. “Poor Polar Bear Thingy (Impecunious Ursus Maritimus Resy - if my Linnaean Pig Latin is correct) is not a number.
Except that people are cutting down trees and deforesting many areas of the world. For example, many poor people in India still cook their food with foraged wood. Women now have to go further and further away to get enough wood to cook each meal.
Just the same, the earth is getting greener despite the issue you cite. You conflate politics to argue against and diminish the actual science. The science says a greener earth is connected to CO2, not rising oceans. This means not only more trees but more bountiful crops with which to feed populations.
Unfortunately the poor in India are the result of the politicians who insist in riding in expensive vehicles, living in lavish residences and taking lavish vacations to DAVOS and etc. None of this can be thrown as guilt on our doorsteps.
Additionally, burning low quality fuel (dung, wood, switchgrass, coal) results in incomplete combustion and the release of particulates indoors resulting in the worldwide and premature deaths of at least 4 million people (I’ve read as high as 50 million).
Idiot Soylent Greens pushed an Organic Farming model Sri Lanka. They were headed toward Haiti levels of collapse - not a stick of wood or a live wild animal - until the political architect of the catastrophe resigned the presidency.
It certainly is, but I don't see her doing much farming unless she can pay someone to do all the hard work. I think this might be a short-lived fad for her, with a bit of virtue signaling thrown in.
I find the alarmists theriomorphic cause of the alleged climate warming amusing as I suspect the hot air production at their conclaves far out pace methane production by cows
Excellent article. Thanks once again for stating what should be obvious if data were properly utilized.
I'm truly to the point that I trust NOTHING coming from our government, and definitely nothing coming out of the world governing bodies. These organizations and the people who run them are power mad incompetents with god complexes.
We must resist as best we can. Buy local, grow your own food as much as possible, and control your own consumer habits.
The one thing these psychopaths can't control is our free will to choose. I like your recommendations. I do them all and the number of people like us is growing every day.
Dianne Stoess I am currently living in Commiefornia, and if the uniparty here gets their way, they will indeed control our free will to choose how we live. All electric homes and cars; no more gas appliances or gas heating/cooling; only battery powered everything. Foodstuffs regulated out of existence. Healthcare through the roof. It's a real s*&throw, frankly. My wife and I will eventually leave here in favor a free state, but as things stand, our problems are going national. Fight on we shall, but my optimism is cautious.
Ugh. California is the worst right now. Most, if not all states will eventually follow. This is global too. So there's nowhere to go. You might find a free state, but if they acquiesce, you'll be in the same boat eventually. There's a way to resist. Peaceful non-compliance. I really don't think the Commies are going to succeed as more and more people wake up, and I see that happening right now, thanks to the many dedicated souls (e.g., Dr. Malone) who have made it their mission to inform the public and stop this New World Order agenda. In addition, there is a new way of living rising up (e.g., regenerative organic farms are trending). There are orgs popping up everywhere offering alternatives in many areas. It's not centralized, but this new culture is spreading rapidly throughout the U.S. I think this is going to be a turbulent year, but the Deep State operatives are losing and they know it. It's not over yet, but we will prevail. Truth and justice always prevail in the end. Happy New Year. Let's make it a good one!
My career ending move as a scientist was to tell the truth about the non-destructive tests that were periodically conducted on the safety-critical structure components of a nuclear power reactor under a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission mandate. The truth was that these tests generated no information about the conditional outcomes of the events of the future for these components thus being functionally worthless.
Yes, The technology is nuclear power. They (The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission0 moved ahead with this technology though I proved to them by way of a peer-reviewed scientific article ( https://www.ndt.net/article/v04n05/oldberg/oldberg.htm ) that this technology is unsafe.
Well, the article looks very technical. But there has been a big argument about the safety of nuclear, as some people want it to replace coal and oil. I have heard arguments beyond the toxicity problems regarding the energy required to process uranium into usable fuel.
But to use a fuel that is poisonous to Man seems inherently risky, no matter how many "containment vessels" you enclose it in. Fukushima made that point. I am sure the arguments you presented in your paper have merit. And I am sure there are other reasons beyond "safe and effective" that some people want to keep nuclear energy alive.
Well, you should know better than I would. But those positions on the Commission are all appointed by the President, so there is more going on there than mere worries about job security.
Telling truth to power is ethically incumbent upon but potentially costly to a person who earns his or her living as a scientific researcher as people in power are apt to wreak vengeance upon a scientist who refuses to lie about his/her findings.
One of the best ways to ensure adequate food (and self sufficiency) is to prohibit patented grains that fail to produce viable seeds for the next crop ((non sterile seeds). The FDA is endangering national security by enabling and approving this diabolical type of (sterile) food crop. This behavior only serves the Monsantos of the planet.
Hybridized wheat that makes people sick. Plants modified so that Roundup can be rained on them. Most prepared foods doused with copious amounts of sugar.
Indeed, and worthy of an entire dedicated article. Yet to reach those that only hear the BBC of MSM is difficult, but worth the effort. This post has been very effective at just that, and exposure to one subject, often leads to reconsideration of many.
Consensus Climatology (CC, the home of climate alarm) entered the world as a fully fledged pseudo-science in 1988 when Jim Hansen testified to Congress about the imminence of human-caused global warming.
I have been studying the integrity of CC data since 2001, and have published 6 peer-reviewed papers on it. The two most recent are the most definitive.
1) Climate models have no predictive value: "Propagation of Error and the Reliability of Global Air Temperature Projections" https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00223
2) The air temperature record is so riddled with measurement uncertainty that neither the rate nor the magnitude of warming since 1900 can be known: "LiG Metrology, Correlated Error, and the Integrity of the Global Surface Air-Temperature Record" https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135976
These papers vacate the entire IPCC narrative. They falsify the EPA's Endangerment Finding regarding our CO₂ emissions. I notified both the IPCC and the EPA. Their response was silence.
As per usual with official narrative falsifiers, I have been derided, insulted and attacked since those papers were published. I have engaged opponents in long debates on PubPeer; opponents hotly making the most incompetent arguments it's been my misfortune to receive (I am a well-published physical methods experimental chemist). My work remains undented.
Tom Nelson recently interviewed me for his climate podcast series. If you wonder about the climate crisis™ and are interested by a refutation of it, you can find the podcast interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-Ke9F0m_gw
The whole AGW thing is a crock.
All the agony, the excess deaths, the spoiled landscapes, the ruined live, the chopped birds and the diversion of billions into the pockets of the already rich is *for nothing*.
The whole pseudo-scientific enterprise should be defunded, including every academic center that sponsored it, and every subsidy terminated.
Absolutely agree... What a waste. No good can come of this from a liberty minded American's point of view. That said: From a globalist point of view what could possibly be better than a populace willingly destroying their own economy to the point where they can be herded into the globalist's great reset without the ability to even put up a fight?
Pat, have you ever spoken to Calvin Beisner, the Pres. and founder of Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation. I have been following their great work for many years and he has been doing it for decades. I have many of his talks on DVD.
He will republish articles written by others, with their permission of course.
Hi Shelly - Thanks for your interest. I've not contacted Calvin Beisner. I'm not familiar with his group, but have posted on the science blog Watts Up With That, which has a large reader-base. You're welcome to send along the links to whomever you like.
For those that may not know, Pat Frank is a very good scientist, and posts excellent comments at WUWT, the most read Global Warming web site. He is an excellent warrior for science based facts..
Pat, consider following this link to a well written Global Warming synopsis, written for the general public for an overview. it has been very effective red pill for anyone who has even a little bit of willingness to read. I would love your thoughts on the post...https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-distortion-of-science/comment/46503352
I'm looking forward to seeing you go deeper and more extensively into the issue of "climate change". I've been researching it for many years. I do believe it's real, but not for the reasons the Deep State tells us. The Sun is in an active cycle at present which has not yet peaked. Earth itself goes through cycles too and we're nearing the end of one. The poles are reversing. As far as man-made activities? Yes. Some. But it has little or nothing to do with the use of fossil fuels. That's the big lie. Climate change is next on the list to further the deep state's agenda. It's an opportunity for fear-porn. Just another control tactic. I agree with everything you say and am looking forward to learning more. It's been in the background for far too long, overshadowed by the cabal's covid scheme. It's time to bring the climate change issue into the light too.
It’s much easier to sell unnatural, dishonest propaganda to people who are separated from nature. For example, blaming global warming on CO2 was such nonsense to me because I could directly observe water vapor to be what efficiently ‘holds in’ the heat of the earth. Watching what happens outside dispels much manufactured BS.
Reading the history of pharmacy tells us what pharma and industrialists did to herbalists in the previous 2 centuries. They seek monopolistic control over the synthetic and natural remedies.
There has been efforts to impede or corrupt discovery and invention forever, though it seems that the problem is recently exacerbated by a concentration of power possible only with a more dependent society.
I am hopeful that as we've seen this year, more and more people are aware to the fake science occurring (thanks to voices like yours). There's a lot of information out there to be shifted through (i.e., a lot of the fake science we believe is real: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/lies-not-discussed-within-the-truth), but as more and more wake up to the truth, polices become enacted to fight against these BS scientific studies.
Franklin, it seems you are more interested in selling your book than you are in plainly stating your beliefs regarding what the truth really is. Your articles question our current assumptions without arriving at any definite alternative conclusion. Of course spirituality is the missing element in "modern" science. But there are some researchers who have applied scientific methods to this subject and so made progress. Are you aware of them?
Years ago, when I first heard of (man made) global cooling, then global warming, then climate change, I couldn’t believe this was being aired as “news”... I thought it was so ridiculous that I was sure no one would believe it and it would go away... looks like I called it wrong 😑...
Only because you thought that everyone went to school to learn critical thinking. Even those I know that had nice paying jobs and are retired now believe the fear porn because they believe the moving mouths on the TV the watch 24/7.
Well, the French Revolution had one way of disposing of the gentry, who were roughly equivalent to the business owners of today. Except that they went overboard and killed a lot of people who weren't in the highest status.
We would need to distinguish between the wealthiest business owners and small businesses, which employ more workers than the large corporations anyway.
Also I don't approve of Madame Guillotine as a solution in any way.
We need to create a nonviolent civil disobedience resistance to take back the US from the government/corporate power, which is the definition of fascism anyway.
It's our country, after all. Only our fear holds us back. They have conquered our minds so that we think they are unstoppable.
Several people have shown the power of the propaganda that is used on us: Caitlin Johnstone, for one. It was said, "The power of capitalism seems invincible. But so was the divine right of kings."
I have been urging people to look beyond the old tropes of resistance and overthrow and focus in on the actual problem: Psychopathic personalities and our ignorance of their modes of operation. The reforms that I favor seek to implement ways to prevent insane people from rising to positions of power in government or business. It's a tricky issue, but I am convinced it is necessary.
That's cool, but doesn't cover business or civil service. How are you going to "limit the power" of a secret agency like the CIA? Or an armed agency like the Air Force? Dr. Strangelove...
Well, you are right, but in the meantime that would mean incremental change. Can't we fold that into a non-violent civil disobedience campaign?
I have been asking people to think about the government we want when we get the country back into our hands. What about the Constitution? Do we keep it, keep it with changes, or write a new one? Don't feel threatened; just think about it.
We can write something into the new Constitution that would screen out psychopaths, but how we would do that without serious privacy issues, I don't know.
Your points are totally valid. The best "non cooperation" campaigns in modern history were those run against the Soviets in Russia and elsewhere. Ukraine is one example they made a movie about.
Earlier this year, Max Borders - on his Substack "Underthrow" - invited readers to submit ideas for a new U.S. Constitution. Not being an academic, I just threw something together based mostly on the current (original) Constitution.
I found a few major omissions that I tried to address in my submission:
1) When does human life start? I suggested starting at birth, as I am tired of the abortion debate.
2) What are proper eligibility requirements to hold office? I added language to encourage that a test of mental and emotional fitness be added to these requirements. The big question is: Who writes that test?
3) Who gave big corporations the OK to lobby in Congress and give huge political donations? I added language to end these practices entirely. Legislators only deal with the individuals that they represent. ONLY.
4) When a large corporation owns billions in assets, hires thousands of people and can make changes that create either chaos or order, what IS their proper place in our political life? Big corporations are de facto political entities. I offer them a special seat in the Senate, if they want one. And that's it. No other corporate access to lawmaking.
5) How did we get the Federal government staring down our throats and into our pocketbooks? I suggested disallowing ALL federal agency contact with individuals for fundraising or fund giving purposes. The federal government may only levy taxes against states, and tariffs against foreign governments, and the same goes for paying out money. If the government wants a "social safety net," it must lean on the states to provide that.
concerning 3 and 4, I suggest no special seat, and their only communication to DC is through public letters. Strong term limits, CXL lobbyists, all communication from all groups to DC are public, politicians must divest all stock holdings and can only nvest in fixed security assets. ( you want to serve right, not get rich)
My prime example of pharma data obfuscation is Relative Risk Reduction, ( RRR ) as opposed to Absolute Risk Reduction, ( ARR ). Anyone unfamiliar with those terms should research them for their own benefit. ARR is truth. RRR is meaningless. Pharma, major media and those complicit in the COVID "vaccine" great hoax cite RRR exclusively. Numbers should be verified, but I recall Pfizer cited 97% efficacy, ( RRR ), while the real efficacy, ( ARR ), was .03%. Is that science distortion or what ?
I rarely believe shit about anything anyone spouts out anymore. There are exceptions, but those have to be presented with, or have available some background, observable, researchable data that I can use to confirm whatever is being spouted, otherwise I'm not buying.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false"?
CIA director William Casey would be so proud of me.🙉
I'm so cynical at this point, that any research report by any government agency is greeted with a 🤔. Again, I'm not buying anything from any bloated, self governing agency with no real oversight.
I am not alone when I say that everything that I thought about the human condition has literally been flipped on its head. I hear this from others all the time.
The Great Awakening is real, and I am grateful to have found others (here and elsewhere) who are living the same experiences I currently am, with those fellow "travelers" (quoting a woman way smarter thab I). This fact alone is what allows me to believe that there are good times ahead, although they will not be achieved without some pain, suffering, and sacrifice, in the meantime.
Yep, from Harry Potter, " clinch your bottoms, its ging to be a bumpy ride."
Concerning "I am not alone when I say that everything that I thought about the human condition has literally been flipped on its head. I hear this from others all the time."
And to think that not long ago a person speaking in behalf of the cabal said "We own the science." This is insanity wrapped in the garb of religion. Praying for us all.
...and dont forget. " I am the Science " Fauccihttps://open.substack.com/pub/anderdaa7/p/does-absolute-power-corrupt?r=slvym&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Right. How is owning the science (actually, the data), while refusing to disclose it, and all the while expecting us to blindly trust them (despite the tons of conflict of interest), any different than any other of the religions of the world that they look down on? These are scary people.
Well, a religious person, if sincere, is focused on changing thmselves, while serving the Divine in others, and THEY, the atheistic tyrants, are focused on being worshipped.
Indeed. I'm addressing their hypocrisy. They magnify science over religion and then trash real science and create a false religion in its place. It's disgusting.
Day 5 of my 17 year old granddaughter (and her family) visiting with us. It's hard not to get frustrated because she is onboard with vaccines (she had 2 covid shots and said she's fine), she wants to go to college to study to be an organic farmer (and help conquer climate change) and it's just generally hard to have a conversation with her. Reading this post was like medicine; it renewed my sanity.
The CO2Coalition shows higher CO2 has caused a greener planet and no rise in temps due to CO2. Teach yourself, then teach her.
What happens with more plant-life? You guessed correctly if you guessed a more moderate global climate with greater retention of carbonaceous material and water on land masses. The Leaf Area Index is reported to have grown by more than 40% with deserts being smaller.
I see her very seldom and she's not teachable. She lives with her mother who knows everything. Our son has no input.
There we go again , it is all about the money, who has the power to disperse it, who is going to benefit from it.
I remember when they put the surgeon generals warning label on all packages of cigarettes. I was a little girl. When my oldest two children were little they were at their grandma’s house. ( my ex husbands mother). She was a heavy smoker. She had just bought 2 cartons of cigarettes. Because of hearing the warning commercials about cigarettes they took grandma’s cigarettes and open each pack and broke up every cigarette. Needless to say Grandma was not happy. They told her that they didn’t want her to die from smoking cigarettes. She still was not happy. Even though we are totally against smoking we had the children earn money to pay grandma back for destroying her cigarettes. Then we had a lesson on agency.
Your anecdote recollection, and post here made me smile
Thank you
Then it is an issue you cannot discuss today. Probably, few other areas either. Critical thinking begins early for some, later for others and for some, never.
Too early to tell where she falls. One must let human nature have its own pace of development.
Used to be helped along with a hairbrush applied to the butt but called child abuse today. Much nicer letting them grow up dumb as a sack of rocks
Lol, there sure are a lot of sacks of rocks walking around here, lately.
Isn't that the truth!😁
Micheal, When I first read your post I felt a thud, but didn't pay much attention. But now that the day has wound down, it comes back to taunt me. (From someone who has seen abuse first hand to others. )This is a conundrum, because I believe in consequences and direction and guidance. But physical hitting, slapping, pushing, pinching, let alone punching is barbaric and unacceptable to me. One good hairbrush to the butt can leave a bruise, but that is the least of the damage. I know, you are talking about a swat, but that easily gives sway to more. I know...
Was something of a handful and mom never understood why an aunt always liked me to visit. Never sussed that the aunt had a humongous peach tree. We got along just fine
Great re-framing of the issues Good Sir!
Fifteen percent of deserts have greened in the last 20 or so years. That’s a surface area the size of the United effin’ States.
Atmospheric CO2 is approximately 400 ppm - a famine for the “Gut Biome” of Gaia - plants. Greenhouses fertilize plants so that the CO2 concentration is 1,000 ppm.
Energy = work. The best thing for the environment - locally and globally - is to use fossil fuels to make poor countries rich as fast as possible. At some $5,000 per capitalism, people have enough capital and psychic breathing room to garden and make their environment sustainably safe.
Mark Steyn’s First Amendment defense and countersuit against Global Warmmonger Michael Mann (the fabulist behind the disappeared “Hockey Stick”) has entered its second decade and fourth judge. A judicial “Turtles all the Way Down” in favor of the Globalists.
Now the empirical Granddaddy question or two for the Warmmongers:
What is the Delta between the current Earth’s temperature and the Optimal Earth’s temperature. Why is that optimal? Show your work.
Hint: the question calls for a number and a unit. “Poor Polar Bear Thingy (Impecunious Ursus Maritimus Resy - if my Linnaean Pig Latin is correct) is not a number.
Stay Red-Pilled my friends.
You clearly know the real science.
He did not use a model
As Mark Twain once said: “figures don’t lie, but liars can figure”. With this statement was he anticipated modern day modeling in the sciences?
Sure sounds like it doesn’t it.
Except that people are cutting down trees and deforesting many areas of the world. For example, many poor people in India still cook their food with foraged wood. Women now have to go further and further away to get enough wood to cook each meal.
Do some homework and look up "deforestation."
Just the same, the earth is getting greener despite the issue you cite. You conflate politics to argue against and diminish the actual science. The science says a greener earth is connected to CO2, not rising oceans. This means not only more trees but more bountiful crops with which to feed populations.
Unfortunately the poor in India are the result of the politicians who insist in riding in expensive vehicles, living in lavish residences and taking lavish vacations to DAVOS and etc. None of this can be thrown as guilt on our doorsteps.
Additionally, burning low quality fuel (dung, wood, switchgrass, coal) results in incomplete combustion and the release of particulates indoors resulting in the worldwide and premature deaths of at least 4 million people (I’ve read as high as 50 million).
Idiot Soylent Greens pushed an Organic Farming model Sri Lanka. They were headed toward Haiti levels of collapse - not a stick of wood or a live wild animal - until the political architect of the catastrophe resigned the presidency.
Susan, that is percisely why India needs, and is building and expanding, fossil fuel power generation. It leads to lower population growth, cleaner envirement, and an improved life. Consider ...https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-distortion-of-science/comment/46503352
Glad it was helpful!
Your grand child needs to learn the ways of the Force. Perhaps a gift subscription to this substack?
Great idea, but she wouldn't read it.
Tell her she is out of the will if she doesn't learn they ways of the Force.
The changes will be immediate...after the requisite tantrum.
Not making fun of anyone Anne. Saw this movie MANY times in my other life.
I wish her well no matter what she chooses to do.
Sounds like she’s a GenZ -- have her read this Substack and see how our future isn’t so bright:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-millennial-genocide
Being an organic farmer is a good goal, especially since Roundup is in all of our food supply.
It certainly is, but I don't see her doing much farming unless she can pay someone to do all the hard work. I think this might be a short-lived fad for her, with a bit of virtue signaling thrown in.
I find the alarmists theriomorphic cause of the alleged climate warming amusing as I suspect the hot air production at their conclaves far out pace methane production by cows
LOL
Ha ha ha! You nailed it!
Excellent article. Thanks once again for stating what should be obvious if data were properly utilized.
I'm truly to the point that I trust NOTHING coming from our government, and definitely nothing coming out of the world governing bodies. These organizations and the people who run them are power mad incompetents with god complexes.
We must resist as best we can. Buy local, grow your own food as much as possible, and control your own consumer habits.
The Force is strong in this one.
The one thing these psychopaths can't control is our free will to choose. I like your recommendations. I do them all and the number of people like us is growing every day.
Dianne Stoess I am currently living in Commiefornia, and if the uniparty here gets their way, they will indeed control our free will to choose how we live. All electric homes and cars; no more gas appliances or gas heating/cooling; only battery powered everything. Foodstuffs regulated out of existence. Healthcare through the roof. It's a real s*&throw, frankly. My wife and I will eventually leave here in favor a free state, but as things stand, our problems are going national. Fight on we shall, but my optimism is cautious.
Ugh. California is the worst right now. Most, if not all states will eventually follow. This is global too. So there's nowhere to go. You might find a free state, but if they acquiesce, you'll be in the same boat eventually. There's a way to resist. Peaceful non-compliance. I really don't think the Commies are going to succeed as more and more people wake up, and I see that happening right now, thanks to the many dedicated souls (e.g., Dr. Malone) who have made it their mission to inform the public and stop this New World Order agenda. In addition, there is a new way of living rising up (e.g., regenerative organic farms are trending). There are orgs popping up everywhere offering alternatives in many areas. It's not centralized, but this new culture is spreading rapidly throughout the U.S. I think this is going to be a turbulent year, but the Deep State operatives are losing and they know it. It's not over yet, but we will prevail. Truth and justice always prevail in the end. Happy New Year. Let's make it a good one!
good post. Red pill someone on Climate Change, and many issues open up. We must be willing to share. Consider this ...https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-distortion-of-science/comment/46503352
Well said!
?...resist as best we can." Part of that is being willing to share where there is even a faint crack of getting through...
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-distortion-of-science/comment/46503352
My career ending move as a scientist was to tell the truth about the non-destructive tests that were periodically conducted on the safety-critical structure components of a nuclear power reactor under a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission mandate. The truth was that these tests generated no information about the conditional outcomes of the events of the future for these components thus being functionally worthless.
You are saying that someone above you in the power structure was intent on moving ahead with this technology, even though it might be unsafe?
Yes, The technology is nuclear power. They (The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission0 moved ahead with this technology though I proved to them by way of a peer-reviewed scientific article ( https://www.ndt.net/article/v04n05/oldberg/oldberg.htm ) that this technology is unsafe.
Well, the article looks very technical. But there has been a big argument about the safety of nuclear, as some people want it to replace coal and oil. I have heard arguments beyond the toxicity problems regarding the energy required to process uranium into usable fuel.
But to use a fuel that is poisonous to Man seems inherently risky, no matter how many "containment vessels" you enclose it in. Fukushima made that point. I am sure the arguments you presented in your paper have merit. And I am sure there are other reasons beyond "safe and effective" that some people want to keep nuclear energy alive.
Among those who wnat to keep nuclear alive are the folks at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. They owe theri jobs to keeping nuclar alive!
Well, you should know better than I would. But those positions on the Commission are all appointed by the President, so there is more going on there than mere worries about job security.
Thank you for continuing to speak truth to power, to shine a light on the darkness.
Telling truth to power is ethically incumbent upon but potentially costly to a person who earns his or her living as a scientific researcher as people in power are apt to wreak vengeance upon a scientist who refuses to lie about his/her findings.
Facts matter and the Malones deliver facts! 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
One of the best ways to ensure adequate food (and self sufficiency) is to prohibit patented grains that fail to produce viable seeds for the next crop ((non sterile seeds). The FDA is endangering national security by enabling and approving this diabolical type of (sterile) food crop. This behavior only serves the Monsantos of the planet.
Hybridized wheat that makes people sick. Plants modified so that Roundup can be rained on them. Most prepared foods doused with copious amounts of sugar.
What could possibly go wrong??????
Indeed, and worthy of an entire dedicated article. Yet to reach those that only hear the BBC of MSM is difficult, but worth the effort. This post has been very effective at just that, and exposure to one subject, often leads to reconsideration of many.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-distortion-of-science/comment/46503352
Great article, imo. Thanks!
Consensus Climatology (CC, the home of climate alarm) entered the world as a fully fledged pseudo-science in 1988 when Jim Hansen testified to Congress about the imminence of human-caused global warming.
I have been studying the integrity of CC data since 2001, and have published 6 peer-reviewed papers on it. The two most recent are the most definitive.
1) Climate models have no predictive value: "Propagation of Error and the Reliability of Global Air Temperature Projections" https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00223
2) The air temperature record is so riddled with measurement uncertainty that neither the rate nor the magnitude of warming since 1900 can be known: "LiG Metrology, Correlated Error, and the Integrity of the Global Surface Air-Temperature Record" https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135976
These papers vacate the entire IPCC narrative. They falsify the EPA's Endangerment Finding regarding our CO₂ emissions. I notified both the IPCC and the EPA. Their response was silence.
As per usual with official narrative falsifiers, I have been derided, insulted and attacked since those papers were published. I have engaged opponents in long debates on PubPeer; opponents hotly making the most incompetent arguments it's been my misfortune to receive (I am a well-published physical methods experimental chemist). My work remains undented.
Tom Nelson recently interviewed me for his climate podcast series. If you wonder about the climate crisis™ and are interested by a refutation of it, you can find the podcast interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-Ke9F0m_gw
The whole AGW thing is a crock.
All the agony, the excess deaths, the spoiled landscapes, the ruined live, the chopped birds and the diversion of billions into the pockets of the already rich is *for nothing*.
The whole pseudo-scientific enterprise should be defunded, including every academic center that sponsored it, and every subsidy terminated.
Absolutely agree... What a waste. No good can come of this from a liberty minded American's point of view. That said: From a globalist point of view what could possibly be better than a populace willingly destroying their own economy to the point where they can be herded into the globalist's great reset without the ability to even put up a fight?
Pat, have you ever spoken to Calvin Beisner, the Pres. and founder of Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation. I have been following their great work for many years and he has been doing it for decades. I have many of his talks on DVD.
He will republish articles written by others, with their permission of course.
Hi Shelly - Thanks for your interest. I've not contacted Calvin Beisner. I'm not familiar with his group, but have posted on the science blog Watts Up With That, which has a large reader-base. You're welcome to send along the links to whomever you like.
For those that may not know, Pat Frank is a very good scientist, and posts excellent comments at WUWT, the most read Global Warming web site. He is an excellent warrior for science based facts..
Pat, consider following this link to a well written Global Warming synopsis, written for the general public for an overview. it has been very effective red pill for anyone who has even a little bit of willingness to read. I would love your thoughts on the post...https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-distortion-of-science/comment/46503352
I'm looking forward to seeing you go deeper and more extensively into the issue of "climate change". I've been researching it for many years. I do believe it's real, but not for the reasons the Deep State tells us. The Sun is in an active cycle at present which has not yet peaked. Earth itself goes through cycles too and we're nearing the end of one. The poles are reversing. As far as man-made activities? Yes. Some. But it has little or nothing to do with the use of fossil fuels. That's the big lie. Climate change is next on the list to further the deep state's agenda. It's an opportunity for fear-porn. Just another control tactic. I agree with everything you say and am looking forward to learning more. It's been in the background for far too long, overshadowed by the cabal's covid scheme. It's time to bring the climate change issue into the light too.
Yes looking forward to learning more too about the climate scam!!!! 😡
Jennifer, I hope you consider this, for yourself as a very good overview, and to share with family or friends that yet talk to you. Not a news feed, always free.https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-distortion-of-science/comment/46503352
Dianne, consider this as an overview, specifically written for non scientist, and to educate those that have even a little bit of respect for you, but only hear the MSM. It has been quite effective.https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-distortion-of-science/comment/46503352
It’s much easier to sell unnatural, dishonest propaganda to people who are separated from nature. For example, blaming global warming on CO2 was such nonsense to me because I could directly observe water vapor to be what efficiently ‘holds in’ the heat of the earth. Watching what happens outside dispels much manufactured BS.
Reading the history of pharmacy tells us what pharma and industrialists did to herbalists in the previous 2 centuries. They seek monopolistic control over the synthetic and natural remedies.
There has been efforts to impede or corrupt discovery and invention forever, though it seems that the problem is recently exacerbated by a concentration of power possible only with a more dependent society.
I'd say the distortion of science might actually have happened a century earlier around the mid-18th century as I discuss in my book: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-history-of-you-a-book-that-connects
I am hopeful that as we've seen this year, more and more people are aware to the fake science occurring (thanks to voices like yours). There's a lot of information out there to be shifted through (i.e., a lot of the fake science we believe is real: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/lies-not-discussed-within-the-truth), but as more and more wake up to the truth, polices become enacted to fight against these BS scientific studies.
Franklin, it seems you are more interested in selling your book than you are in plainly stating your beliefs regarding what the truth really is. Your articles question our current assumptions without arriving at any definite alternative conclusion. Of course spirituality is the missing element in "modern" science. But there are some researchers who have applied scientific methods to this subject and so made progress. Are you aware of them?
Years ago, when I first heard of (man made) global cooling, then global warming, then climate change, I couldn’t believe this was being aired as “news”... I thought it was so ridiculous that I was sure no one would believe it and it would go away... looks like I called it wrong 😑...
Only because you thought that everyone went to school to learn critical thinking. Even those I know that had nice paying jobs and are retired now believe the fear porn because they believe the moving mouths on the TV the watch 24/7.
Wish you were right too as it is total BS!
Read the book Salt Sugar Fat and find out that those Big Tobacco executives now run the processed food industry.
So the problem, then, is those business executives. What do you think we should do about them? They qualify as criminals, do they not?
Well, the French Revolution had one way of disposing of the gentry, who were roughly equivalent to the business owners of today. Except that they went overboard and killed a lot of people who weren't in the highest status.
We would need to distinguish between the wealthiest business owners and small businesses, which employ more workers than the large corporations anyway.
Also I don't approve of Madame Guillotine as a solution in any way.
We need to create a nonviolent civil disobedience resistance to take back the US from the government/corporate power, which is the definition of fascism anyway.
It's our country, after all. Only our fear holds us back. They have conquered our minds so that we think they are unstoppable.
Several people have shown the power of the propaganda that is used on us: Caitlin Johnstone, for one. It was said, "The power of capitalism seems invincible. But so was the divine right of kings."
I have been urging people to look beyond the old tropes of resistance and overthrow and focus in on the actual problem: Psychopathic personalities and our ignorance of their modes of operation. The reforms that I favor seek to implement ways to prevent insane people from rising to positions of power in government or business. It's a tricky issue, but I am convinced it is necessary.
Larry, it is my perspective that the best way to prevent psychopaths from power, is to severly limit government power and terms.https://open.substack.com/pub/anderdaa7/p/does-absolute-power-corrupt?r=slvym&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
That's cool, but doesn't cover business or civil service. How are you going to "limit the power" of a secret agency like the CIA? Or an armed agency like the Air Force? Dr. Strangelove...
Well, you are right, but in the meantime that would mean incremental change. Can't we fold that into a non-violent civil disobedience campaign?
I have been asking people to think about the government we want when we get the country back into our hands. What about the Constitution? Do we keep it, keep it with changes, or write a new one? Don't feel threatened; just think about it.
We can write something into the new Constitution that would screen out psychopaths, but how we would do that without serious privacy issues, I don't know.
Well we could follow the constitution (it is superb, and ignored) we have, and I fully support non cooperation. Consider this perspective. https://open.substack.com/pub/anderdaa7/p/does-absolute-power-corrupt?r=slvym&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Your points are totally valid. The best "non cooperation" campaigns in modern history were those run against the Soviets in Russia and elsewhere. Ukraine is one example they made a movie about.
Earlier this year, Max Borders - on his Substack "Underthrow" - invited readers to submit ideas for a new U.S. Constitution. Not being an academic, I just threw something together based mostly on the current (original) Constitution.
I found a few major omissions that I tried to address in my submission:
1) When does human life start? I suggested starting at birth, as I am tired of the abortion debate.
2) What are proper eligibility requirements to hold office? I added language to encourage that a test of mental and emotional fitness be added to these requirements. The big question is: Who writes that test?
3) Who gave big corporations the OK to lobby in Congress and give huge political donations? I added language to end these practices entirely. Legislators only deal with the individuals that they represent. ONLY.
4) When a large corporation owns billions in assets, hires thousands of people and can make changes that create either chaos or order, what IS their proper place in our political life? Big corporations are de facto political entities. I offer them a special seat in the Senate, if they want one. And that's it. No other corporate access to lawmaking.
5) How did we get the Federal government staring down our throats and into our pocketbooks? I suggested disallowing ALL federal agency contact with individuals for fundraising or fund giving purposes. The federal government may only levy taxes against states, and tariffs against foreign governments, and the same goes for paying out money. If the government wants a "social safety net," it must lean on the states to provide that.
concerning 3 and 4, I suggest no special seat, and their only communication to DC is through public letters. Strong term limits, CXL lobbyists, all communication from all groups to DC are public, politicians must divest all stock holdings and can only nvest in fixed security assets. ( you want to serve right, not get rich)
My prime example of pharma data obfuscation is Relative Risk Reduction, ( RRR ) as opposed to Absolute Risk Reduction, ( ARR ). Anyone unfamiliar with those terms should research them for their own benefit. ARR is truth. RRR is meaningless. Pharma, major media and those complicit in the COVID "vaccine" great hoax cite RRR exclusively. Numbers should be verified, but I recall Pfizer cited 97% efficacy, ( RRR ), while the real efficacy, ( ARR ), was .03%. Is that science distortion or what ?
Well, let me say it out loud...
I rarely believe shit about anything anyone spouts out anymore. There are exceptions, but those have to be presented with, or have available some background, observable, researchable data that I can use to confirm whatever is being spouted, otherwise I'm not buying.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false"?
CIA director William Casey would be so proud of me.🙉
I'm so cynical at this point, that any research report by any government agency is greeted with a 🤔. Again, I'm not buying anything from any bloated, self governing agency with no real oversight.
I am not alone when I say that everything that I thought about the human condition has literally been flipped on its head. I hear this from others all the time.
The Great Awakening is real, and I am grateful to have found others (here and elsewhere) who are living the same experiences I currently am, with those fellow "travelers" (quoting a woman way smarter thab I). This fact alone is what allows me to believe that there are good times ahead, although they will not be achieved without some pain, suffering, and sacrifice, in the meantime.
It's a bumpy ride, and it will be interesting.
Yep, from Harry Potter, " clinch your bottoms, its ging to be a bumpy ride."
Concerning "I am not alone when I say that everything that I thought about the human condition has literally been flipped on its head. I hear this from others all the time."
I am a bit surprised we are so surprised, as what has deevolved in the US and many nations, has a long history. Consider..https://open.substack.com/pub/anderdaa7/p/does-absolute-power-corrupt?r=slvym&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
And to think that not long ago a person speaking in behalf of the cabal said "We own the science." This is insanity wrapped in the garb of religion. Praying for us all.
...and dont forget. " I am the Science " Fauccihttps://open.substack.com/pub/anderdaa7/p/does-absolute-power-corrupt?r=slvym&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Right. How is owning the science (actually, the data), while refusing to disclose it, and all the while expecting us to blindly trust them (despite the tons of conflict of interest), any different than any other of the religions of the world that they look down on? These are scary people.
Well, a religious person, if sincere, is focused on changing thmselves, while serving the Divine in others, and THEY, the atheistic tyrants, are focused on being worshipped.
Indeed. I'm addressing their hypocrisy. They magnify science over religion and then trash real science and create a false religion in its place. It's disgusting.