The “Great Reset” is accelerating. Because too many on our side still think we can fix this by long-term RINO replacement. The problem is, as we saw this past week, you learn nothing about where politicians stand on the big stuff in political campaigns. They avoid it like a plague to keep from losing votes. E.g., Putin has said he'd rath…
The “Great Reset” is accelerating. Because too many on our side still think we can fix this by long-term RINO replacement. The problem is, as we saw this past week, you learn nothing about where politicians stand on the big stuff in political campaigns. They avoid it like a plague to keep from losing votes. E.g., Putin has said he'd rather have Biden over Trump since he's predictable.
I think Putin is a wise man in that respect: J.D. Vance has said,
" there’s going to have to be some American security assistance [to Ukraine] over the long term. "
How could Putin trust that to be anything substantially different from putting Ukraine into NATO? He knows how deceitful our government is. Not getting a warm fuzzy from Trump and Vance.
I sent my brother my own write up about Vance the day Trump announced his VP. I also posted on Dr. Malone's cross-post from The Truth About Cancer this morning as a response to a commenter who think this VP pick proves Trump is not after the deep state.
There was no way that Trump was not going to be saddled with an infiltrator, that would have been suicide for the globalist. I've been downcast ever since. I was afraid this would happen and it did.
YOU know, Shelly, exactly who and what the so-called "deep-state" is - and that it has embedded its (globalist) members within the U.S. federal apparatus no matter Democrat or Republican - as for instance the infestation of BOTH terms of President Ronald Reagan by the members of (that) "NGO".
Did you see and listen to the acceptance speech of Vance?
Yeah, the Bush family apple IS wormy - took me some time to wise up to that; but after his Pence mistake do you really think Trump would choose Vance unless he was absolutely, thoroughly vetted?
Yes he would because he allows all the wrong people have his ear.
Watching his rally tonight in MI. He had two people running for MI Senate seat come on stage. The first said I'm backing out since you endorsed Mike so I am endorsing him also. That Mike is Mike Rogers, House Rep MI from 2001-2014. His JBS average score for all those years is only 51%. He is very far from being a conservative. After being a rep he went to work for CNN as its national security news expert. He was chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. He is not a good guy. Trump is being fooled.
He does not take input willy/nilly and has a tight team of players that protect him from such input. He needs as many chances to live and learn as we do when we keep expecting those we vote for to represent us. Basically, it will never happen - such is a life of 'hope'.
IF the International Collective left wins via default of the American government (and the Democrat and Republican "parties") to "UPHOLD" the (as written) Constitution of the USA there will be NO "hope", Shelly.
As it is NOW, in 2024 AD, the USA is teetering on the very edge of the END of the "Fragile Experiment with Freedom" Ben Franklin spoke of in 1787; and if the U.N.s "AGENDA-2030" becomes international 'law" - any thoughts on 'hope' of again having individual freedom and liberty will be hopeless.
I was surprised. Never paid much attention. Who one was often doesn't necessarily reflect on whom one becomes. I did run across something to the effect DJT Jr highly recommended JDV.
Well, right! But, I was well versed re Obama. Hannity and my local radio guys left no rock unturned. This time JD not as much. At least we arent looking at 8 yrs of presidency for him.. Affordable time to pin it down?
The “Great Reset” is accelerating. Because too many on our side still think we can fix this by long-term RINO replacement. The problem is, as we saw this past week, you learn nothing about where politicians stand on the big stuff in political campaigns. They avoid it like a plague to keep from losing votes. E.g., Putin has said he'd rather have Biden over Trump since he's predictable.
I think Putin is a wise man in that respect: J.D. Vance has said,
" there’s going to have to be some American security assistance [to Ukraine] over the long term. "
How could Putin trust that to be anything substantially different from putting Ukraine into NATO? He knows how deceitful our government is. Not getting a warm fuzzy from Trump and Vance.
This doesn't help either - https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/07/19/the-mirror/
I sent my brother my own write up about Vance the day Trump announced his VP. I also posted on Dr. Malone's cross-post from The Truth About Cancer this morning as a response to a commenter who think this VP pick proves Trump is not after the deep state.
There was no way that Trump was not going to be saddled with an infiltrator, that would have been suicide for the globalist. I've been downcast ever since. I was afraid this would happen and it did.
Shelly? Are you saying J.D. is one of "them"?
That is my take until the apple is slice to see if the worm is inside. That could come in Trump's early presidency if he wins.
YOU know, Shelly, exactly who and what the so-called "deep-state" is - and that it has embedded its (globalist) members within the U.S. federal apparatus no matter Democrat or Republican - as for instance the infestation of BOTH terms of President Ronald Reagan by the members of (that) "NGO".
Did you see and listen to the acceptance speech of Vance?
Nope. Remember Ann Coulter's question when Bush 43 nominated Roberts to the highest bench? "who the hell is he?"
Yeah, the Bush family apple IS wormy - took me some time to wise up to that; but after his Pence mistake do you really think Trump would choose Vance unless he was absolutely, thoroughly vetted?
Your thoughts?
Yes he would because he allows all the wrong people have his ear.
Watching his rally tonight in MI. He had two people running for MI Senate seat come on stage. The first said I'm backing out since you endorsed Mike so I am endorsing him also. That Mike is Mike Rogers, House Rep MI from 2001-2014. His JBS average score for all those years is only 51%. He is very far from being a conservative. After being a rep he went to work for CNN as its national security news expert. He was chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. He is not a good guy. Trump is being fooled.
I stand corrected, Shelly...
You are on the ball!
Question is HOW to get Trump to realize (at least) some % of his choices will be moles, snakes and worse?
Any ideas?
He does not take input willy/nilly and has a tight team of players that protect him from such input. He needs as many chances to live and learn as we do when we keep expecting those we vote for to represent us. Basically, it will never happen - such is a life of 'hope'.
IF the International Collective left wins via default of the American government (and the Democrat and Republican "parties") to "UPHOLD" the (as written) Constitution of the USA there will be NO "hope", Shelly.
As it is NOW, in 2024 AD, the USA is teetering on the very edge of the END of the "Fragile Experiment with Freedom" Ben Franklin spoke of in 1787; and if the U.N.s "AGENDA-2030" becomes international 'law" - any thoughts on 'hope' of again having individual freedom and liberty will be hopeless.
I was surprised. Never paid much attention. Who one was often doesn't necessarily reflect on whom one becomes. I did run across something to the effect DJT Jr highly recommended JDV.
I'm waiting for receipts.
As we all should Jean. Just sometimes by then it's too late.
I remember when O first stepped out and thought who is he and what makes him fit for president. Who is Vance and what makes him VP material?
Well, right! But, I was well versed re Obama. Hannity and my local radio guys left no rock unturned. This time JD not as much. At least we arent looking at 8 yrs of presidency for him.. Affordable time to pin it down?