12 Comments
тна Return to thread

YOU know, Shelly, exactly who and what the so-called "deep-state" is - and that it has embedded its (globalist) members within the U.S. federal apparatus no matter Democrat or Republican - as for instance the infestation of BOTH terms of President Ronald Reagan by the members of (that) "NGO".

Did you see and listen to the acceptance speech of Vance?

Expand full comment

Nope. Remember Ann Coulter's question when Bush 43 nominated Roberts to the highest bench? "who the hell is he?"

Expand full comment

Yeah, the Bush family apple IS wormy - took me some time to wise up to that; but after his Pence mistake do you really think Trump would choose Vance unless he was absolutely, thoroughly vetted?

Your thoughts?

Expand full comment

Yes he would because he allows all the wrong people have his ear.

Watching his rally tonight in MI. He had two people running for MI Senate seat come on stage. The first said I'm backing out since you endorsed Mike so I am endorsing him also. That Mike is Mike Rogers, House Rep MI from 2001-2014. His JBS average score for all those years is only 51%. He is very far from being a conservative. After being a rep he went to work for CNN as its national security news expert. He was chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. He is not a good guy. Trump is being fooled.

Expand full comment

I stand corrected, Shelly...

You are on the ball!

Question is HOW to get Trump to realize (at least) some % of his choices will be moles, snakes and worse?

Any ideas?

Expand full comment

He does not take input willy/nilly and has a tight team of players that protect him from such input. He needs as many chances to live and learn as we do when we keep expecting those we vote for to represent us. Basically, it will never happen - such is a life of 'hope'.

Expand full comment

IF the International Collective left wins via default of the American government (and the Democrat and Republican "parties") to "UPHOLD" the (as written) Constitution of the USA there will be NO "hope", Shelly.

As it is NOW, in 2024 AD, the USA is teetering on the very edge of the END of the "Fragile Experiment with Freedom" Ben Franklin spoke of in 1787; and if the U.N.s "AGENDA-2030" becomes international 'law" - any thoughts on 'hope' of again having individual freedom and liberty will be hopeless.

Expand full comment

I was surprised. Never paid much attention. Who one was often doesn't necessarily reflect on whom one becomes. I did run across something to the effect DJT Jr highly recommended JDV.

I'm waiting for receipts.

Expand full comment

As we all should Jean. Just sometimes by then it's too late.

I remember when O first stepped out and thought who is he and what makes him fit for president. Who is Vance and what makes him VP material?

Expand full comment

Well, right! But, I was well versed re Obama. Hannity and my local radio guys left no rock unturned. This time JD not as much. At least we arent looking at 8 yrs of presidency for him.. Affordable time to pin it down?

Expand full comment

Given VPs don't make decision or have voting records . . .

He has not even completed one third of his term as Senator. In 2019 was absolutely pro life at a rally and in 2022 voted for the 15 week Graham bill. Recently has deleted pro-life sections of his Senate campaign website to align with Trump's new stance of yes abortion but a time limit. His tax and Ukraine policies have shifted as have Trump's. The General election does not require reversing stances, it did not during Reagan's campaigns.

As is usually the case, hoping for the best . . .

Expand full comment

Definitely not a promising start.

Expand full comment