Personally believe this is vital! During my federal employment I briefly was involved with drafting parts of laws, and drafting parts of regulations. I was surprised and dismayed to find we bureaucrats had such a substantial license. When I participated in responding to letters that came in response to published proposed regulations, I w…
Personally believe this is vital! During my federal employment I briefly was involved with drafting parts of laws, and drafting parts of regulations. I was surprised and dismayed to find we bureaucrats had such a substantial license. When I participated in responding to letters that came in response to published proposed regulations, I was advised how to respond. Personally felt the responses were generally non-responsive. SSA is likely one of the lesser of the Administrative States. One last observation, the laws that were passed were generally so loose that the regulatory interpretation could suit the administrative state. I couldn't agree more that a swift and decisive Schedule F authority is needed for all the reasons set out!
This is our #1 issue. We cannot rank anything higher than this issue. It is an issue we can and should all agree on. All political sides and all people.
It is like having a computer that has been hacked and corrupted. When we sit here arguing about hot button issues that is like arguing about what programs run better on the corrupted computer. NONE of them run better. Not until we fix the system. We have to put all of our attention on focusing the ACTUAL SYSTEM first. It's not that hard to do actually. We just need a movement. A decentralized one. And a plan.
Dr. Malone identifies the problem, but what is the solution? Our systems have been corrupted by regulatory capture and special interest groups - we can't expect the system to fix itself. We need a NEW idea. One that makes the old one obsolete.
If our problem is systemic corruption the best cure is radical FORCED TRANSPARENCY.
For some unknown reason my Norton sees your hyperlink as a threat and doesn't want me to go there.
Beyond that, from what you've said expect we are pretty much in agreement. I came across an article this morning which seems to infer we may have an opportunity to use this Supreme Court decision as a part of devising actions. My own feeling has been with need to get our lawmakers to review and TIGHTEN the language in the laws they write so the regulatory state can't take the law off its track. We may need to demand more access and responsive consideration as a part of required review as regulations are proposed. We need more transparency/exposure and means of identifying and fixing problems
On Thursday the Supreme Court handed down a ruling that will significantly curtail the power of executive agencies to control entire sectors of the economy through promulgating rules.
While some commentators view this decision narrowly as a determination of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) ability to promulgate regulations to address climate change, In practice, IT SETS A PRECEDENT THAT WILL LIMIT THE ABILITY OF ALL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES TO MAKE REGULATIONS that shift entire industries without specific congressional authority to do so.
Personally believe this is vital! During my federal employment I briefly was involved with drafting parts of laws, and drafting parts of regulations. I was surprised and dismayed to find we bureaucrats had such a substantial license. When I participated in responding to letters that came in response to published proposed regulations, I was advised how to respond. Personally felt the responses were generally non-responsive. SSA is likely one of the lesser of the Administrative States. One last observation, the laws that were passed were generally so loose that the regulatory interpretation could suit the administrative state. I couldn't agree more that a swift and decisive Schedule F authority is needed for all the reasons set out!
OUR SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED.
This is our #1 issue. We cannot rank anything higher than this issue. It is an issue we can and should all agree on. All political sides and all people.
It is like having a computer that has been hacked and corrupted. When we sit here arguing about hot button issues that is like arguing about what programs run better on the corrupted computer. NONE of them run better. Not until we fix the system. We have to put all of our attention on focusing the ACTUAL SYSTEM first. It's not that hard to do actually. We just need a movement. A decentralized one. And a plan.
Dr. Malone identifies the problem, but what is the solution? Our systems have been corrupted by regulatory capture and special interest groups - we can't expect the system to fix itself. We need a NEW idea. One that makes the old one obsolete.
If our problem is systemic corruption the best cure is radical FORCED TRANSPARENCY.
I beg all of you to read this:
https://joshketry.substack.com/p/what-we-need-is-a-transparency-movement
For some unknown reason my Norton sees your hyperlink as a threat and doesn't want me to go there.
Beyond that, from what you've said expect we are pretty much in agreement. I came across an article this morning which seems to infer we may have an opportunity to use this Supreme Court decision as a part of devising actions. My own feeling has been with need to get our lawmakers to review and TIGHTEN the language in the laws they write so the regulatory state can't take the law off its track. We may need to demand more access and responsive consideration as a part of required review as regulations are proposed. We need more transparency/exposure and means of identifying and fixing problems
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/stacey-lennox/2022/06/30/breaking-scotus-reigns-in-the-power-of-the-epa-n1607295
BREAKING: SCOTUS Reins in the Power of the EPA
By Stacey Lennox Jun 30, 2022 10:36 AM ET
On Thursday the Supreme Court handed down a ruling that will significantly curtail the power of executive agencies to control entire sectors of the economy through promulgating rules.
While some commentators view this decision narrowly as a determination of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) ability to promulgate regulations to address climate change, In practice, IT SETS A PRECEDENT THAT WILL LIMIT THE ABILITY OF ALL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES TO MAKE REGULATIONS that shift entire industries without specific congressional authority to do so.