NPR had a segment this morning on how those with kids who are not eligible for vaccination are scared. They cherry pick all the stories and shut down comments when they run counter to their narrative. All the money is in the direction of burying the truth.
NPR had a segment this morning on how those with kids who are not eligible for vaccination are scared. They cherry pick all the stories and shut down comments when they run counter to their narrative. All the money is in the direction of burying the truth.
Since WNYC and SHU are doing fund raising this week I sent them this email, which I believe does some good, at least it puts a fly in their noggins of why people will not give them free money:
Dear NPR;
We used to trust you for objective grass roots journalism. Not any more. Your reporting during the covid pandemic has been completely one sided. Your programming sounds like it is coming out of government talking points constantly.
You've had zero coverage of vaccine adverse events which are now well over a million recorded in the VAERS system. Just one link for you to read by an anonymous doctor afraid of being fired if he came out publicly: Adverse Reactions to COVID Vaccines I Have Come Across (substack.com) Robert Malone, Steve Kirsch and Alex Berenson offer tough minded articles that are timely and honest.
You are heavily funded by conflicted corporate interests. When I want objective journalism I will turn on WBAI with the little money they do get actually tries to offer objective grass roots news. I will see what Glenn Greenwald and Chris Hedges are saying about the war as your coverage is biased by government talking points. You don't have tough alternative voices on your program, just placid non-controversial people.
During one of their fund drives, they had on of their journalist who told her story that she used to work for AP but much preferred working at NPR because she could interpret news from AP and present it to NPR listeners in a way that was more meaningful and relevant....I stopped listening to them a long time ago. I'll make my own interpretations thank you!!
I know! And when I send articles to friends and family from "conservative" sites, they stick their noses up at them because of all the unsavory ads and I try to point out they have to do that since they don't get government handouts! So not fair!
Commercial radio and TV are a wasteland, occasionally they feature the other side or controversial issues but not in depth.
Actually PBS gets very little from the government, they used to have superb journalism. But when the higher bidders who contribute to them are pushing a particular story line, they will quash the truth.
NPR had a segment this morning on how those with kids who are not eligible for vaccination are scared. They cherry pick all the stories and shut down comments when they run counter to their narrative. All the money is in the direction of burying the truth.
Disgusting
Since WNYC and SHU are doing fund raising this week I sent them this email, which I believe does some good, at least it puts a fly in their noggins of why people will not give them free money:
Dear NPR;
We used to trust you for objective grass roots journalism. Not any more. Your reporting during the covid pandemic has been completely one sided. Your programming sounds like it is coming out of government talking points constantly.
You've had zero coverage of vaccine adverse events which are now well over a million recorded in the VAERS system. Just one link for you to read by an anonymous doctor afraid of being fired if he came out publicly: Adverse Reactions to COVID Vaccines I Have Come Across (substack.com) Robert Malone, Steve Kirsch and Alex Berenson offer tough minded articles that are timely and honest.
You are heavily funded by conflicted corporate interests. When I want objective journalism I will turn on WBAI with the little money they do get actually tries to offer objective grass roots news. I will see what Glenn Greenwald and Chris Hedges are saying about the war as your coverage is biased by government talking points. You don't have tough alternative voices on your program, just placid non-controversial people.
While we are burying our people.
During one of their fund drives, they had on of their journalist who told her story that she used to work for AP but much preferred working at NPR because she could interpret news from AP and present it to NPR listeners in a way that was more meaningful and relevant....I stopped listening to them a long time ago. I'll make my own interpretations thank you!!
And they are taxpayer funded. I responded to the Austin PBS fund drive with тАЬI am already paying, and YOU should be non-partisan.тАЭ
I know! And when I send articles to friends and family from "conservative" sites, they stick their noses up at them because of all the unsavory ads and I try to point out they have to do that since they don't get government handouts! So not fair!
Commercial radio and TV are a wasteland, occasionally they feature the other side or controversial issues but not in depth.
Actually PBS gets very little from the government, they used to have superb journalism. But when the higher bidders who contribute to them are pushing a particular story line, they will quash the truth.