Dr. Malone, with all due respect, the time to have stopped this was before it started. The orginal trial results screamed STOP! But the FDA and CDC colluded to hide that data until it was recently revealed.
Second, the Lancet reviewers are not letting the CDC "get away" with anything. THEY'RE COMPLICIT! Don't forget the paper that mirac…
Dr. Malone, with all due respect, the time to have stopped this was before it started. The orginal trial results screamed STOP! But the FDA and CDC colluded to hide that data until it was recently revealed.
Second, the Lancet reviewers are not letting the CDC "get away" with anything. THEY'RE COMPLICIT! Don't forget the paper that miraculously got past what is supposed to be a rigorous review process and smashed HCQ as an early treatment game changer. No Sir! This is not turning a blind eye. It is willful. It is criminal. It is accessory after the fact and It's a cover up! And they're doing it because to do anything else would be an admission of guilt!
The other paper I was thinking about was written by Dr. Andrew Hill who works at liverpool university and whos said university received 40 million dollars from Unitiad just 6 days prior to Andrew Hill scuttling Ivermectin for a new wing or something..... oh and guess who's on the board... Billy Gates😉.
Lancet, NEJOM and the rest will not publish bombshell papers, just whitewashed pre-ordained conclusions that get written first by "peer-reviewed" scientists after skimming the data so as to advance their careers. Conclusion: "We have the typically expected, statistically spread out, adverse events but nothing alarming or inviting more serious investigations. The jury is still out and it may take years to evaluate all the data and if there is too much, it may get mis-interpreted. Our tireless civil servants deserve all due credit for their years of sacrificial service, we all owe them a debt of gratitude. Nothing can repay their 100 plus hour weeks during the pandemic."
If I read your reply correctly I'm afraid I'd have to disagree with your conclusions. I believe the system is irredeemably corrupt. I suggest you read RFK Jr.'s latest book if you haven't already. In the interest of time you could skip to the last chapter. As well you could watch the interview if a whistle blower by The High Wire which was re-aired on the Steve Deace program which air's on The Blaze but can also be found on Rumble. Here's the link to that episode.
Dr. Malone, with all due respect, the time to have stopped this was before it started. The orginal trial results screamed STOP! But the FDA and CDC colluded to hide that data until it was recently revealed.
Second, the Lancet reviewers are not letting the CDC "get away" with anything. THEY'RE COMPLICIT! Don't forget the paper that miraculously got past what is supposed to be a rigorous review process and smashed HCQ as an early treatment game changer. No Sir! This is not turning a blind eye. It is willful. It is criminal. It is accessory after the fact and It's a cover up! And they're doing it because to do anything else would be an admission of guilt!
Yes. There is no limit to what they will do to hide their crimes.
The Lancet, like most medical journals, derive their main revenue from adversing of pharamceutical companies. The whole model stinks from head to toe
I think the paper you mention was on Hydroxychloroquine . Dosis' were far too low and it was used far too late
The other paper I was thinking about was written by Dr. Andrew Hill who works at liverpool university and whos said university received 40 million dollars from Unitiad just 6 days prior to Andrew Hill scuttling Ivermectin for a new wing or something..... oh and guess who's on the board... Billy Gates😉.
Yes of course your right. Thank you. I posted in the emotional heat of the moment. Thank you for pointing out out. I'll make the correction.
Lancet, NEJOM and the rest will not publish bombshell papers, just whitewashed pre-ordained conclusions that get written first by "peer-reviewed" scientists after skimming the data so as to advance their careers. Conclusion: "We have the typically expected, statistically spread out, adverse events but nothing alarming or inviting more serious investigations. The jury is still out and it may take years to evaluate all the data and if there is too much, it may get mis-interpreted. Our tireless civil servants deserve all due credit for their years of sacrificial service, we all owe them a debt of gratitude. Nothing can repay their 100 plus hour weeks during the pandemic."
If I read your reply correctly I'm afraid I'd have to disagree with your conclusions. I believe the system is irredeemably corrupt. I suggest you read RFK Jr.'s latest book if you haven't already. In the interest of time you could skip to the last chapter. As well you could watch the interview if a whistle blower by The High Wire which was re-aired on the Steve Deace program which air's on The Blaze but can also be found on Rumble. Here's the link to that episode.
Skip to the 48:58 minute mark for the interview.
https://rumble.com/vwvcgp-to-a-dark-place-we-go-guest-jason-zachary-3822.html
Cheers.