Postscript- quite literally, immediately after I pushed the button to publish this, Secretary Kennedy called me. The interpretation above is correct. Susan Monarez is apparently a dynamo, is working closely with DOGE, and is doing great work as acting director. She has strong support from Bobby. Apparently, there is a lot of resistance to change at the CDC, and Monarez is taking on and overcoming all resistance. I am shocked, shocked that there is so much resistance to oversight and reform <sarcasm>. In any case, don’t judge a book by its cover. The energetic Susan Monarez may be just what the doctor (or perhaps surgeon would be a better metaphor) ordered for treating a very sick CDC.
Great update...without the inside baseball info on many people, one has limited intel to know what their real intent or actions are. This could be good news...there are some people on the inside of gov that knows it was corrupt and they would also like to clean it up as an insider....sometimes insiders know where to start. So this seems good moves by Trump admin and RFK.
From her CV and lack of any "real", clinical or research experience Monarez at first appears a scary pick, specially considering the DEI stuff. However, YOUR take on all this is very levelling and sure makes one want to give her a roll. Hey, they can always replace people and who am I to second guess when Kennedy has been waiting for this his whole life-- not too much too second guess there, for sure.
THEN, RFK, Jr. . . calls YOU, presciently, a second after you send this news out.
Appreciate this measured take. As in any worthwhile endeavor, the greatest opposition comes not from your enemies, but so-called “friends” & unfortunately their criticism/second guessing is in the long run more destructive. Of course, the ultimate example is Judas Iscariot. I have no doubt that Judas felt he was being “true to the cause”. My best guess is, based on experience & what DOGE is reporting, probably 90% of the staffs are decent people trying/wanting to do the right thing, but have never been given the opportunity.
I will NEVER forget her masking my grandbabies!! I will NEVER forget my little grandson's hands being RAW from washing for fear of death!! NEVER, EVER, EVER!! I don't trust ANY of them!! Not RFK, Jr, not her, not Trump!! Trump gets his advice from the WRONG people!! So frustrated with the lot of them!!! And yes, I voted for Trump.
Nor DC, nor Chicago, nor New York, nor …. anyplace without fields of grass with cows 🐄 and horses 🐎 and emu (what ! No emoji for emu!) or all the darlings of Mother Nature and no highways, cars, skyscrapers and noise. I’m with you Drs M.
The institutions that educated Monarez are cause for pause. However; there is nowhere to go but up, based upon recent CDC Directors. Better yet, RFK, Jr. is her boss.
Someone please tell me her positions on Covid origins and gain of function bio defense work, masking mandates, vaccine mandates, hiding the data done by the drug companies which told the truth about the Covid vaccines , and why VAERS, imperfect as it was, made no difference as a safety signal on the mRNA vax. Another good question would be what she plans to do about avian influenza.
I tried to find that out - According to the AIs, there is no specific reference or quotes from her supporting mRNA vaccines, BUT they did mention that she did support the all-out efforts by the government for "COVID measures." -
This article is from today. If true, it sheds more light on who Susan Monarez is & what she is in favor of. It is from Natural News. The author is Lance D. Johnson:
President Trump nominates Dr. Susan Monarez, acting CDC director, to permanently lead the agency, replacing withdrawn nominee David Weldon.
Monarez, a longtime federal health bureaucrat, is expected to maintain the CDC’s aggressive vaccine schedule, including controversial shots for Covid, flu, and HPV.
Health freedom advocates warn the nomination is a deliberate move to block Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s push for accountability, transparency, and scientific integrity at the CDC.
Monarez has already endorsed the updated Covid shot for children as young as six months, despite mounting evidence of risks and inefficacy.
A political shield for the vaccine industry
In a move that has alarmed medical freedom advocates, President Donald Trump announced Monday his nomination of Dr. Susan Monarez to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The decision, framed as a restoration of trust in the embattled agency, is instead being seen as a calculated maneuver to protect the pharmaceutical industry’s stranglehold on public health policy. Monarez, who has served as acting director since January, is a career government insider with deep ties to federal health bureaucracies—precisely the kind of establishment figure likely to perpetuate the CDC’s disastrous vaccine mandates and unscientific recommendations.
Trump’s abrupt withdrawal of his initial nominee, Dr. David Weldon—a former Florida congressman aligned with RFK Jr.’s skepticism of the CDC’s vaccine agenda—reveals the real motive behind Monarez’s selection. Weldon’s nomination was reportedly scuttled due to lack of Senate support, but insiders suggest the deeper reason was his willingness to challenge the agency’s cozy relationship with Big Pharma. Monarez, by contrast, has already signaled her allegiance to the status quo. Just days ago, she publicly urged parents to inject their infants with the latest Covid shot, despite the vaccine’s well-documented links to myocarditis, neurological damage, and other life-altering injuries.
“Dr. Monarez understands the importance of protecting our children,” Trump declared in a Truth Social post, oblivious to the irony. Yet her track record suggests otherwise. Before joining the CDC, Monarez worked at the Department of Homeland Security and the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy, where she championed mass surveillance of public health data and the expansion of biometric monitoring—policies that align perfectly with the globalist push for digital health passports and forced medical compliance.
The CDC’s long descent into corruption
Founded in 1946 to combat malaria, the CDC has morphed into a bloated, $9.2 billion bureaucracy that prioritizes pharmaceutical profits over genuine public health. Under Monarez’s interim leadership, the agency has doubled down on debunked Covid narratives, suppressed data on vaccine injuries, and ignored peer-reviewed studies linking childhood immunizations to autism, autoimmune disorders, and sudden infant death syndrome.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s own Health and Human Services Secretary, has spent decades exposing the CDC’s malfeasance—from burying evidence of mercury toxicity in vaccines to colluding with Merck to falsify safety studies for the HPV shot. Now, with Monarez at the helm, Kennedy’s efforts to dismantle the agency’s corruption face near-insurmountable opposition. “Americans have lost confidence in the CDC due to political bias and disastrous mismanagement,” Trump admitted in his announcement—yet his solution is to install another industry-approved gatekeeper.
A betrayal of the medical freedom movement
Trump’s decision is a slap in the face to the millions of parents who rallied behind his 2024 campaign, believing he would dismantle the medical tyranny unleashed during the pandemic. Instead, Monarez’s nomination ensures the CDC will continue pushing dangerous, ineffective vaccines while silencing dissenters. Her close ties to the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H)—a federal entity notorious for funneling taxpayer dollars into risky mRNA experiments—further confirm her allegiance to the biosecurity state.
As Kennedy fights to hold the CDC accountable for its crimes against humanity, Monarez’s appointment guarantees bureaucratic resistance at every turn. Will Trump’s administration become yet another enabler of Big Pharma’s predation, or will the growing backlash from betrayed voters force a reckoning? History may remember this moment as the day the medical freedom movement was sold out—or the day it rose up stronger than ever.
Great article Debra, you’re always up on this. There’s something really off with Trump when it comes to this shot. He’s never mentioned all the deaths and adverse reactions it has caused and it’s rubbed me the wrong way since he allowed it to be pushed through. Very disappointing that it seems we will never get to the bottom of this again..
Yes, James, it is very disappointing. Not sure if you saw this substack & video, but it is worth reading/watching. It is Dr. Christine Drivdahl-Smith giving testimony at the Montana Judicial Committee earlier this month. It is available at Dr. William Makis' substack. Once you are at the site, scroll down until you see, "Doctor Testifies mRNA Vaccines Are Most Destructive, Lethal Medical Products Ever Used". This video & testimony should be seen by both Trump & Susan Monarez, PhD. The video is less than 5-min (that is all the time that the doctor was allotted, apparently). www.makismd.substack.com. (Covid Intel).
You know Debra I don’t care who it is, if it’s wrong it’s wrong. These people that idolize others scare me. Between this, the complete destruction of Gaza and the Ukraine to me is disheartening. I’ve always been pro Israel but when I saw the picture of Gaza from space there’s barely a neighborhood or two left, it’s completely destroyed. I’ve got into it with a few people, and there are good Palestinian people that live there too. There people just like good Jewish people and good English people, etc. Trump said these wars would be over before he was inaugurated, and I believed him. What’s wrong is wrong period!
You are correct, James. Death & destruction are never the answer. All it does it generate more anger & retaliation. Sadly, the Palestinians voted for the wrong party who were hell-bent on destroying Israel & as many Israelis as possible. They may not have realized just how determined Hamas was. The fall-out from that decision has created this monster of a situation. Now good & innocent people dying by the thousands. It's horrible. This whole disastrous situation is an anathema for me. As a nurse, it is especially disturbing as were the deliberate lethal hospital protocols for covid. Where are people's humanity? We are supposed to be helping each other, not fast-tracking people to their demise. It's soul-crushing to put it mildly.
It is soul crushing… I have no solid information on this, and when I say it to people I normally hear crickets but did Hamas win in a free and fair election, with no corruption, no disappearing votes, no intimidation? Honestly I don’t know, but if were to guess they stole it, which makes it more sad innocent people dying by bombs. BTW I hate with all my heart what took place October 7th. I just think Israel could have rid themselves of Hamas in a different way. I do understand Israeli sediment.
That is a very real possibility, James. If we in the U.S. cannot even ensure that we have election integrity, you can be sure that elections in places such as Palestine are even more questionable. My guess is that Israel, knowing that Hamas has a single-minded goal (the elimination of Israel & Israelis), they intend to crush them, rather than to allow that to happen. I'd like to think that a negotiation was possible, but that seems to be a pie-in-the-sky notion. I don't know what the answer is, but this path of relentless death & destruction is not solving anything. The religious tenets are not at all compatible, compounding the whole situation.
Yes, that is certainly true. I think that what happened on October 7th, however, was just a bridge too far which caused Israel to become very reactionary rather than methodical. Now they are steeped in this situation with no workable solution. In other words, they leaped before they looked.
Thank you for sharing this!! I don't trust her and I don't trust RFK, Jr. and I don't trust Trump! Not on this! I will NEVER forget what they did to my grandbabies! Masking them when they were in diapers! My little 8 year old grandson had beet red, raw hands from washing them so much for fear of death! I still cry thinking about it.
Jennifer Wendel is the Chief Information Officer under HHS. I wonder if she had any part in any information given to this reporter which may have colored his viewpoint. If he was just given her background/previous work history, without any input from Ms. Monarez, he might write up this article with a less favorable projection.
I couldn't find anything saying she had recently pushed for children to continue Covid shots, but that sentence does bother me.
My view. Almost every reporter these days is looking for the sensational. If it's not eye grabbing, they get hit for not 'doing their job' to sell.
Time will tell, but I'm happy RFKJ reached out to the good Drs and they have provided 'truth' as is known for now!
Look, quit throwing the baby out with the bath water. One bad choice (if it actually is bad) does not mean the whole puzzle is put together wrong. For God sake, have some resilience. Give the man some slack. He can always fire her or replace if she proves obstructionistic.
I hope your perspective is correct, as it offers hope in what in so many ways appears to be a divine crack down on corruption and a riddance of subversive globalist traitors that have occupied government and control our institutions.
Promotion of mRNA jabs into babies and children is, to me, similar to promotion of pedophilia, and those who commit such evil are sick evil malignant beings.
let us hope she does not make it. we don't need another fauci. Hopefully they will accept Dr. Ladapo from Florida, but who knows which strings are being pulled. If she makes it, I suppose that will be the end of all investigations into dangerous jabs, meds, and the end of all hopes to get the likes of fauci jailed.
Things that make me go Hmm! I have become skeptical by nature on everything these days. (Note: I was just watching the Senate hearing so my BS meter is pegged right now). I will think about this nomination for a while. The last four years of lies and deceptions best observed by gaslight has skewed my trust factor a wee bit.
I am pleased to be a paid subscriber. I consider it well worth the money for the information that I receive, some of which I do not get from my other information sources.
There’s something noble about a boss sticking up for his people at least until all the facts come out. To me Susan Monarez sounds like an insider that probably won’t pursue the criminals of the mRNA “vaccine” the way most of us would prefer. But that said maybe Trump just wants a smooth nomination and not another fight. He also, as I’ve said before, may not want to implicate himself in the involvement of the 17 million people that died because of the “vaccine” he lowered the standard to get pushed through.
This is off topic but as Susan will be a member of this administration, never overlook all members should keep looking over their shoulder. Why would anyone of sound mind believe anything the government state run media says. Mr. Goldberg, of the Atlantic, and his devious history should be looked at with a very critical eye. Russia Russia Russia, the there are good people on both sides lie, the lie Trump called WW2 vets suckers and losers are all out right lies or words taken completely out of context Goldberg pushed. There are just to many questions at this time about what Goldberg has, if anything of substance, how he got it, and how in hell was he ever put on that thread, if he even was??
The Atlantic,based in Washington DC, is owned by Laurene Powell Jobs widower of apples Steve Jobs. She bought the Atlantic with the intention of being a far left wing publication. She along with most “news publications” are all out to get Trump and anyone associated with his administration period! I know Trump has learnt enough too not jump to any conclusions with this story in regard to Hegseth or Mike Waltz. Let’s not forget what the communist and their state run media did to General Mike Flynn. I say screw the state run media. Let’s start with finding out what Goldberg actually has and who put him on that thread. If someone intentionally added him heads should roll. If it was a mistake fix them. Trump should stay on offense and as far as I’m concerned this pathetic habitual liar Goldberg should never be believed. His reputation precedes him. J.Goodrich
As for the Goldberg participation in the top level communication, My bet in on a setup. Find the perpetrators and associates and kill their abilities, opportunities and actions.
hmmm. Spooky is more like it, rather than DEI. But we need someone in there that knows the ways of the federal bureaucracy and is ready and able to take them on. Apparently, per RFK, that is her key qualification.
Was writing above before your response. Why not put that expertise to work at FDA where it belongs and put CDC. back to work fighting infectious disease, not analyzing it to death?
Let me add further that it has been the expansion of CDC into roles it had no business going into that has brought it to the sorry state it is in. IMHO it has no role in monitoring adverse responses to meds and jabs...that belongs to FDA. The last thing this monstrosity of our Fed needs is more redundancy. Slim it down DOGE, don't grow it!
Yes, that’s also been my position as well. Are we appointing nominees to get government out of our personal lives, like D.O.E., or are we going to keep political money laundering through healthcare, etc.?
Was UW and Stanford major benefactors of NAIAD funding over the years? Will the mindset change in regards to research goals, or will RNA research accelerate to keep us on the wrong path?
As Trump once said about Dr. Ben Carson, it sounds like she'll be an "okay" Director. Dr. Malone's inclusion in the comments that RFK Jr. approves of her is the best endorsement she could get.
I wish her success and hope she will be very beneficial to Secretary Kennedy reaching his goals
Thanks for your input on this nomination. I have some concerns because of her affiliation with the Obama-Biden administrations. However, your postscript was helpful in alleviating some of those concerns. Let’s hope her scalpel is sharp and she succeeds in excising the necessary components of CDC and bringing about needed change.
Postscript- quite literally, immediately after I pushed the button to publish this, Secretary Kennedy called me. The interpretation above is correct. Susan Monarez is apparently a dynamo, is working closely with DOGE, and is doing great work as acting director. She has strong support from Bobby. Apparently, there is a lot of resistance to change at the CDC, and Monarez is taking on and overcoming all resistance. I am shocked, shocked that there is so much resistance to oversight and reform <sarcasm>. In any case, don’t judge a book by its cover. The energetic Susan Monarez may be just what the doctor (or perhaps surgeon would be a better metaphor) ordered for treating a very sick CDC.
Thank you for this information. If RFKJ is ok with her, then that’s good enough for me. Please post this on X so the MAHA people will calm down.
Thanks for calming my fears, Docs M.
The proof will be in the pudding. Whisk away!
Great update...without the inside baseball info on many people, one has limited intel to know what their real intent or actions are. This could be good news...there are some people on the inside of gov that knows it was corrupt and they would also like to clean it up as an insider....sometimes insiders know where to start. So this seems good moves by Trump admin and RFK.
From her CV and lack of any "real", clinical or research experience Monarez at first appears a scary pick, specially considering the DEI stuff. However, YOUR take on all this is very levelling and sure makes one want to give her a roll. Hey, they can always replace people and who am I to second guess when Kennedy has been waiting for this his whole life-- not too much too second guess there, for sure.
THEN, RFK, Jr. . . calls YOU, presciently, a second after you send this news out.
THAT is a Godwink!
And, that is a synchronicity.
can it be both?
Appreciate this measured take. As in any worthwhile endeavor, the greatest opposition comes not from your enemies, but so-called “friends” & unfortunately their criticism/second guessing is in the long run more destructive. Of course, the ultimate example is Judas Iscariot. I have no doubt that Judas felt he was being “true to the cause”. My best guess is, based on experience & what DOGE is reporting, probably 90% of the staffs are decent people trying/wanting to do the right thing, but have never been given the opportunity.
Awesome!!! Thanks for letting us know immediately!
Basic requirement. Open scientific mind and independent thought!
I will NEVER forget her masking my grandbabies!! I will NEVER forget my little grandson's hands being RAW from washing for fear of death!! NEVER, EVER, EVER!! I don't trust ANY of them!! Not RFK, Jr, not her, not Trump!! Trump gets his advice from the WRONG people!! So frustrated with the lot of them!!! And yes, I voted for Trump.
My choice for CDC Director is one R.W. Malone, MD, MS. But nobody asked me.
How about Assistant Director? There is such a position, right?
I do not want to live in Atlanta, but thanks for the complement.
Can't say I blame you for that!
Nor DC, nor Chicago, nor New York, nor …. anyplace without fields of grass with cows 🐄 and horses 🐎 and emu (what ! No emoji for emu!) or all the darlings of Mother Nature and no highways, cars, skyscrapers and noise. I’m with you Drs M.
Pretty sure Trump and Melania don't want to live in DC, either. But for love of country...
Then we would miss the farm stories that brighten our days!
53rd, we are totally thinking alike. I was just going to post something to this effect when I saw your comment here🤙
I would feel safer if the CDC director were Dr Robert Malone
The institutions that educated Monarez are cause for pause. However; there is nowhere to go but up, based upon recent CDC Directors. Better yet, RFK, Jr. is her boss.
Someone please tell me her positions on Covid origins and gain of function bio defense work, masking mandates, vaccine mandates, hiding the data done by the drug companies which told the truth about the Covid vaccines , and why VAERS, imperfect as it was, made no difference as a safety signal on the mRNA vax. Another good question would be what she plans to do about avian influenza.
One wishes the subcommittee hearing on her nomination would present these issues!.
And what about OWS — Operation Warp Speed?
Did she support approving the jab for children? If so, she would be forever on my "no way in hell" list.
I tried to find that out - According to the AIs, there is no specific reference or quotes from her supporting mRNA vaccines, BUT they did mention that she did support the all-out efforts by the government for "COVID measures." -
Then she should be asked
Here, Here.
This article is from today. If true, it sheds more light on who Susan Monarez is & what she is in favor of. It is from Natural News. The author is Lance D. Johnson:
President Trump nominates Dr. Susan Monarez, acting CDC director, to permanently lead the agency, replacing withdrawn nominee David Weldon.
Monarez, a longtime federal health bureaucrat, is expected to maintain the CDC’s aggressive vaccine schedule, including controversial shots for Covid, flu, and HPV.
Health freedom advocates warn the nomination is a deliberate move to block Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s push for accountability, transparency, and scientific integrity at the CDC.
Monarez has already endorsed the updated Covid shot for children as young as six months, despite mounting evidence of risks and inefficacy.
A political shield for the vaccine industry
In a move that has alarmed medical freedom advocates, President Donald Trump announced Monday his nomination of Dr. Susan Monarez to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The decision, framed as a restoration of trust in the embattled agency, is instead being seen as a calculated maneuver to protect the pharmaceutical industry’s stranglehold on public health policy. Monarez, who has served as acting director since January, is a career government insider with deep ties to federal health bureaucracies—precisely the kind of establishment figure likely to perpetuate the CDC’s disastrous vaccine mandates and unscientific recommendations.
Trump’s abrupt withdrawal of his initial nominee, Dr. David Weldon—a former Florida congressman aligned with RFK Jr.’s skepticism of the CDC’s vaccine agenda—reveals the real motive behind Monarez’s selection. Weldon’s nomination was reportedly scuttled due to lack of Senate support, but insiders suggest the deeper reason was his willingness to challenge the agency’s cozy relationship with Big Pharma. Monarez, by contrast, has already signaled her allegiance to the status quo. Just days ago, she publicly urged parents to inject their infants with the latest Covid shot, despite the vaccine’s well-documented links to myocarditis, neurological damage, and other life-altering injuries.
“Dr. Monarez understands the importance of protecting our children,” Trump declared in a Truth Social post, oblivious to the irony. Yet her track record suggests otherwise. Before joining the CDC, Monarez worked at the Department of Homeland Security and the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy, where she championed mass surveillance of public health data and the expansion of biometric monitoring—policies that align perfectly with the globalist push for digital health passports and forced medical compliance.
The CDC’s long descent into corruption
Founded in 1946 to combat malaria, the CDC has morphed into a bloated, $9.2 billion bureaucracy that prioritizes pharmaceutical profits over genuine public health. Under Monarez’s interim leadership, the agency has doubled down on debunked Covid narratives, suppressed data on vaccine injuries, and ignored peer-reviewed studies linking childhood immunizations to autism, autoimmune disorders, and sudden infant death syndrome.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s own Health and Human Services Secretary, has spent decades exposing the CDC’s malfeasance—from burying evidence of mercury toxicity in vaccines to colluding with Merck to falsify safety studies for the HPV shot. Now, with Monarez at the helm, Kennedy’s efforts to dismantle the agency’s corruption face near-insurmountable opposition. “Americans have lost confidence in the CDC due to political bias and disastrous mismanagement,” Trump admitted in his announcement—yet his solution is to install another industry-approved gatekeeper.
A betrayal of the medical freedom movement
Trump’s decision is a slap in the face to the millions of parents who rallied behind his 2024 campaign, believing he would dismantle the medical tyranny unleashed during the pandemic. Instead, Monarez’s nomination ensures the CDC will continue pushing dangerous, ineffective vaccines while silencing dissenters. Her close ties to the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H)—a federal entity notorious for funneling taxpayer dollars into risky mRNA experiments—further confirm her allegiance to the biosecurity state.
As Kennedy fights to hold the CDC accountable for its crimes against humanity, Monarez’s appointment guarantees bureaucratic resistance at every turn. Will Trump’s administration become yet another enabler of Big Pharma’s predation, or will the growing backlash from betrayed voters force a reckoning? History may remember this moment as the day the medical freedom movement was sold out—or the day it rose up stronger than ever.
Sources include:
X.com
Foxnews.com
TheBusinessJournal.com
RELATED TOPICS
Great article Debra, you’re always up on this. There’s something really off with Trump when it comes to this shot. He’s never mentioned all the deaths and adverse reactions it has caused and it’s rubbed me the wrong way since he allowed it to be pushed through. Very disappointing that it seems we will never get to the bottom of this again..
Yes, James, it is very disappointing. Not sure if you saw this substack & video, but it is worth reading/watching. It is Dr. Christine Drivdahl-Smith giving testimony at the Montana Judicial Committee earlier this month. It is available at Dr. William Makis' substack. Once you are at the site, scroll down until you see, "Doctor Testifies mRNA Vaccines Are Most Destructive, Lethal Medical Products Ever Used". This video & testimony should be seen by both Trump & Susan Monarez, PhD. The video is less than 5-min (that is all the time that the doctor was allotted, apparently). www.makismd.substack.com. (Covid Intel).
You know Debra I don’t care who it is, if it’s wrong it’s wrong. These people that idolize others scare me. Between this, the complete destruction of Gaza and the Ukraine to me is disheartening. I’ve always been pro Israel but when I saw the picture of Gaza from space there’s barely a neighborhood or two left, it’s completely destroyed. I’ve got into it with a few people, and there are good Palestinian people that live there too. There people just like good Jewish people and good English people, etc. Trump said these wars would be over before he was inaugurated, and I believed him. What’s wrong is wrong period!
You are correct, James. Death & destruction are never the answer. All it does it generate more anger & retaliation. Sadly, the Palestinians voted for the wrong party who were hell-bent on destroying Israel & as many Israelis as possible. They may not have realized just how determined Hamas was. The fall-out from that decision has created this monster of a situation. Now good & innocent people dying by the thousands. It's horrible. This whole disastrous situation is an anathema for me. As a nurse, it is especially disturbing as were the deliberate lethal hospital protocols for covid. Where are people's humanity? We are supposed to be helping each other, not fast-tracking people to their demise. It's soul-crushing to put it mildly.
It is soul crushing… I have no solid information on this, and when I say it to people I normally hear crickets but did Hamas win in a free and fair election, with no corruption, no disappearing votes, no intimidation? Honestly I don’t know, but if were to guess they stole it, which makes it more sad innocent people dying by bombs. BTW I hate with all my heart what took place October 7th. I just think Israel could have rid themselves of Hamas in a different way. I do understand Israeli sediment.
That is a very real possibility, James. If we in the U.S. cannot even ensure that we have election integrity, you can be sure that elections in places such as Palestine are even more questionable. My guess is that Israel, knowing that Hamas has a single-minded goal (the elimination of Israel & Israelis), they intend to crush them, rather than to allow that to happen. I'd like to think that a negotiation was possible, but that seems to be a pie-in-the-sky notion. I don't know what the answer is, but this path of relentless death & destruction is not solving anything. The religious tenets are not at all compatible, compounding the whole situation.
Israel could have killed Hamas slowly and methodically as they killed everyone that took hostages in the 1972 Munich summer Olympics.
Yes, that is certainly true. I think that what happened on October 7th, however, was just a bridge too far which caused Israel to become very reactionary rather than methodical. Now they are steeped in this situation with no workable solution. In other words, they leaped before they looked.
I saw that link but I didn’t watch it I’ll try to find it thanks Debra!!
Thank you for sharing this!! I don't trust her and I don't trust RFK, Jr. and I don't trust Trump! Not on this! I will NEVER forget what they did to my grandbabies! Masking them when they were in diapers! My little 8 year old grandson had beet red, raw hands from washing them so much for fear of death! I still cry thinking about it.
Jennifer Wendel is the Chief Information Officer under HHS. I wonder if she had any part in any information given to this reporter which may have colored his viewpoint. If he was just given her background/previous work history, without any input from Ms. Monarez, he might write up this article with a less favorable projection.
I couldn't find anything saying she had recently pushed for children to continue Covid shots, but that sentence does bother me.
My view. Almost every reporter these days is looking for the sensational. If it's not eye grabbing, they get hit for not 'doing their job' to sell.
Time will tell, but I'm happy RFKJ reached out to the good Drs and they have provided 'truth' as is known for now!
I just read the first few sentences. If the article is true, then my faith in this administration is dead.
If the article is true, then we are screwed, royally.
Look, quit throwing the baby out with the bath water. One bad choice (if it actually is bad) does not mean the whole puzzle is put together wrong. For God sake, have some resilience. Give the man some slack. He can always fire her or replace if she proves obstructionistic.
I hope your perspective is correct, as it offers hope in what in so many ways appears to be a divine crack down on corruption and a riddance of subversive globalist traitors that have occupied government and control our institutions.
Promotion of mRNA jabs into babies and children is, to me, similar to promotion of pedophilia, and those who commit such evil are sick evil malignant beings.
Things you can't unsee...
let us hope she does not make it. we don't need another fauci. Hopefully they will accept Dr. Ladapo from Florida, but who knows which strings are being pulled. If she makes it, I suppose that will be the end of all investigations into dangerous jabs, meds, and the end of all hopes to get the likes of fauci jailed.
The Fauci issue is with the FBI now, not HHS.
I don’t think Kennedy nor the likes of Rand Paul are going to let that happen.
Things that make me go Hmm! I have become skeptical by nature on everything these days. (Note: I was just watching the Senate hearing so my BS meter is pegged right now). I will think about this nomination for a while. The last four years of lies and deceptions best observed by gaslight has skewed my trust factor a wee bit.
I am pleased to be a paid subscriber. I consider it well worth the money for the information that I receive, some of which I do not get from my other information sources.
There’s something noble about a boss sticking up for his people at least until all the facts come out. To me Susan Monarez sounds like an insider that probably won’t pursue the criminals of the mRNA “vaccine” the way most of us would prefer. But that said maybe Trump just wants a smooth nomination and not another fight. He also, as I’ve said before, may not want to implicate himself in the involvement of the 17 million people that died because of the “vaccine” he lowered the standard to get pushed through.
This is off topic but as Susan will be a member of this administration, never overlook all members should keep looking over their shoulder. Why would anyone of sound mind believe anything the government state run media says. Mr. Goldberg, of the Atlantic, and his devious history should be looked at with a very critical eye. Russia Russia Russia, the there are good people on both sides lie, the lie Trump called WW2 vets suckers and losers are all out right lies or words taken completely out of context Goldberg pushed. There are just to many questions at this time about what Goldberg has, if anything of substance, how he got it, and how in hell was he ever put on that thread, if he even was??
The Atlantic,based in Washington DC, is owned by Laurene Powell Jobs widower of apples Steve Jobs. She bought the Atlantic with the intention of being a far left wing publication. She along with most “news publications” are all out to get Trump and anyone associated with his administration period! I know Trump has learnt enough too not jump to any conclusions with this story in regard to Hegseth or Mike Waltz. Let’s not forget what the communist and their state run media did to General Mike Flynn. I say screw the state run media. Let’s start with finding out what Goldberg actually has and who put him on that thread. If someone intentionally added him heads should roll. If it was a mistake fix them. Trump should stay on offense and as far as I’m concerned this pathetic habitual liar Goldberg should never be believed. His reputation precedes him. J.Goodrich
As for the Goldberg participation in the top level communication, My bet in on a setup. Find the perpetrators and associates and kill their abilities, opportunities and actions.
Thank you for informing us Dr. Malone. I concur with your analysis and conclusion. Time will tell.
Her history reeks of DEI to me but I am a strictly bench oriented scientist (long retired)
hmmm. Spooky is more like it, rather than DEI. But we need someone in there that knows the ways of the federal bureaucracy and is ready and able to take them on. Apparently, per RFK, that is her key qualification.
Was writing above before your response. Why not put that expertise to work at FDA where it belongs and put CDC. back to work fighting infectious disease, not analyzing it to death?
Let me add further that it has been the expansion of CDC into roles it had no business going into that has brought it to the sorry state it is in. IMHO it has no role in monitoring adverse responses to meds and jabs...that belongs to FDA. The last thing this monstrosity of our Fed needs is more redundancy. Slim it down DOGE, don't grow it!
Yes, that’s also been my position as well. Are we appointing nominees to get government out of our personal lives, like D.O.E., or are we going to keep political money laundering through healthcare, etc.?
Hard to white-wash that background. Who will she actually be working for? What’s her stance on OneHealth?
Good questions. We need the answers!!
Was UW and Stanford major benefactors of NAIAD funding over the years? Will the mindset change in regards to research goals, or will RNA research accelerate to keep us on the wrong path?
Of course they are— beneficiaries, not benefactors.
Thank you!
As Trump once said about Dr. Ben Carson, it sounds like she'll be an "okay" Director. Dr. Malone's inclusion in the comments that RFK Jr. approves of her is the best endorsement she could get.
I wish her success and hope she will be very beneficial to Secretary Kennedy reaching his goals
for MAHA.
Thanks for your input on this nomination. I have some concerns because of her affiliation with the Obama-Biden administrations. However, your postscript was helpful in alleviating some of those concerns. Let’s hope her scalpel is sharp and she succeeds in excising the necessary components of CDC and bringing about needed change.