I have often stated my objections to the barrage of jabs given to infants and children without ever offering a cogent rationale
Here, I hope, is one. I once collaborated, as a molecular biologist, on an ovarian cancer immunotherapy protocol. The aim was to duplicate Rosenberg's TIL treatment of melanoma but had limited success. I once ask…
I have often stated my objections to the barrage of jabs given to infants and children without ever offering a cogent rationale
Here, I hope, is one. I once collaborated, as a molecular biologist, on an ovarian cancer immunotherapy protocol. The aim was to duplicate Rosenberg's TIL treatment of melanoma but had limited success. I once asked the PI whether he thought peripheral T cells might be substituted for TIL (tumor invasive T cells) and he replied Rosenberg had shown them to be ineffective. That got me to considering possible clonality of T cells re their location. I performed a single experiment with T cells isolated from an ovarian tumor that in fact hinted at clonality. This led me to propose the existence of site specific immuno- tolerance.
If in fact T cells, and perhaps other immuno elements, do exhibit strong site specificity, then it seems idiotic to monkey with the evolving immune system as it matures along with the infant/child who continues to develop throughout childhood (the encloning process as it were) and the failure to recognize this by the insistence of a host of jabs during that process may in fact explain the rash of autoimmune disorders we are seeing today as they interfere with the completed adaptation of the immuno elements to their host organism
I have often stated my objections to the barrage of jabs given to infants and children without ever offering a cogent rationale
Here, I hope, is one. I once collaborated, as a molecular biologist, on an ovarian cancer immunotherapy protocol. The aim was to duplicate Rosenberg's TIL treatment of melanoma but had limited success. I once asked the PI whether he thought peripheral T cells might be substituted for TIL (tumor invasive T cells) and he replied Rosenberg had shown them to be ineffective. That got me to considering possible clonality of T cells re their location. I performed a single experiment with T cells isolated from an ovarian tumor that in fact hinted at clonality. This led me to propose the existence of site specific immuno- tolerance.
If in fact T cells, and perhaps other immuno elements, do exhibit strong site specificity, then it seems idiotic to monkey with the evolving immune system as it matures along with the infant/child who continues to develop throughout childhood (the encloning process as it were) and the failure to recognize this by the insistence of a host of jabs during that process may in fact explain the rash of autoimmune disorders we are seeing today as they interfere with the completed adaptation of the immuno elements to their host organism
The saddest part is here is born perfection at the highest life form levels.
Who the hell figured it was of any real benefits to juice kids with toxins?
And granted such ersatz opinions to enable the rights to mess with perfection?
I totally get the 1988 bullshit tricks that launched big pHARMA to new profit heavens.
"We've seen NEEDLE and the damage done"!