Now that the PERK act was extended to 2029 by the Biden administration, they can continue to experiment on humans with RNA molecules rather than use Muga Mice without a immune system that cost $300 each. Isn't it interesting that they know the true role of the immune system being the number one defense against all pathogens and little ef…
Now that the PERK act was extended to 2029 by the Biden administration, they can continue to experiment on humans with RNA molecules rather than use Muga Mice without a immune system that cost $300 each. Isn't it interesting that they know the true role of the immune system being the number one defense against all pathogens and little effort is expended to make sure Americans have a vibrant and effective immune system. I wonder why?
Some thoughts on vaccines. We now know that profits are the main drivers of criminal behavior by pharma. That needs changing and one way to tone it down would be the creation of a federal vaccine authority to manufacture all vaccines deemed essential for the overall public health of the nation and provide them at cost where/when needed. That would eliminate the pressure by the gov on pharma to over produce stocks and then encourage their over use to keep the profit drive for their manufacture operating. And then allow for a less profit driven assessment of what is really needed. Perhaps the research apparatus could apply itself to the warp speed development of effective antivirals since it has been made unequivically clear that vaccines are a poor offering against RNA viruses and would lessen the use of essentially weak to virtually useless vaccines.
And that would be a good thing . Today I keep hearing about emerging microbial public health threats that were rare if even present at all when I was a public health bacteriologist in the '60s. I wonder if many (all?) of them formerly lived with us in a symbiotic relationship until all these incessant jabs so compromised our innate herd immunity that they are no longer our friends. Another strong argument for the abatement of all those jabs.
Very slippery slope…having the government manufacturing anything…they are not in the drug and manufacturing business for one thing. I’ve been in mfg all my life and it would not be a good outcome having the gov do it. Less government is good government. There are other solutions which we all know and starts with truth and honesty and free will/informed consent. This will start the self correction IMO.
Either/or. But eliminate the profit motive for what we have just witnessed. The contractor option would keep the gov/ contractor revolving door open. That door has to be slammed shut.
Agree the revolving door needs to be closed and locked. Was disheartened to read HHS is evidently agreeing to big foods not having to comply with dye removal until 2028. Not to mention hearing glycosate ads every 2 to 3 hours now.
Now that the PERK act was extended to 2029 by the Biden administration, they can continue to experiment on humans with RNA molecules rather than use Muga Mice without a immune system that cost $300 each. Isn't it interesting that they know the true role of the immune system being the number one defense against all pathogens and little effort is expended to make sure Americans have a vibrant and effective immune system. I wonder why?
Some thoughts on vaccines. We now know that profits are the main drivers of criminal behavior by pharma. That needs changing and one way to tone it down would be the creation of a federal vaccine authority to manufacture all vaccines deemed essential for the overall public health of the nation and provide them at cost where/when needed. That would eliminate the pressure by the gov on pharma to over produce stocks and then encourage their over use to keep the profit drive for their manufacture operating. And then allow for a less profit driven assessment of what is really needed. Perhaps the research apparatus could apply itself to the warp speed development of effective antivirals since it has been made unequivically clear that vaccines are a poor offering against RNA viruses and would lessen the use of essentially weak to virtually useless vaccines.
And that would be a good thing . Today I keep hearing about emerging microbial public health threats that were rare if even present at all when I was a public health bacteriologist in the '60s. I wonder if many (all?) of them formerly lived with us in a symbiotic relationship until all these incessant jabs so compromised our innate herd immunity that they are no longer our friends. Another strong argument for the abatement of all those jabs.
Has some merit. The real key is having a healthy food system without chemicals/toxins and a vibrant and healthy immune system! Go RFK!
Very slippery slope…having the government manufacturing anything…they are not in the drug and manufacturing business for one thing. I’ve been in mfg all my life and it would not be a good outcome having the gov do it. Less government is good government. There are other solutions which we all know and starts with truth and honesty and free will/informed consent. This will start the self correction IMO.
Agree about nutrition. We would be much healthier today if the gov had kept its,hands off the subject
Regulatory Capture exists in Big Food. Malone and Del interview is worth the time.
'federal vaccine authority'
Given the perversions of federal operations, it might be preferable to consider limited. tightly controlled contractors?
Either/or. But eliminate the profit motive for what we have just witnessed. The contractor option would keep the gov/ contractor revolving door open. That door has to be slammed shut.
Agree the revolving door needs to be closed and locked. Was disheartened to read HHS is evidently agreeing to big foods not having to comply with dye removal until 2028. Not to mention hearing glycosate ads every 2 to 3 hours now.