My recollection is that the FBI received a specific tip about the Parkland shooter in 2018, but did not act on it. But from the feds' standpoint, why should they be responsive for the purposes of localized, focused protection when they can work towards broad, nationwide crackdowns on constitutional rights instead? Their real goals have been made plain.
My recollection is that the FBI received a specific tip about the Parkland shooter in 2018, but did not act on it. But from the feds' standpoint, why should they be responsive for the purposes of localized, focused protection when they can work towards broad, nationwide crackdowns on constitutional rights instead? Their real goals have been made plain.
My recollection is that the FBI received a specific tip about the Parkland shooter in 2018, but did not act on it. But from the feds' standpoint, why should they be responsive for the purposes of localized, focused protection when they can work towards broad, nationwide crackdowns on constitutional rights instead? Their real goals have been made plain.