As we begin to emerge from the tunnel of the COVIDcrisis and all of the biowarfare, information warfare, WHO, WEF and US Department of Homeland Security mismanagement which has caused so much damage, we are being presented with a “Great Reset” vision of a fourth industrial revolution, transhumanism, and a new class structure of Physicals, Virtuals, Machines and “Davos Man” Overlords which is being globally pitched by the World Economic Forum and its acolytes as the inevitable outcome.
Pointing out the naivety and flaws in the reasoning of Klaus Schwab and his wingman Yuval Noah Harari is a favorite trope of those writing from an alternative perspective. This recent essay, titled “The Dangerous Populist Science of Yuval Noah Harari” (06 July 2022, Current Affairs) provides an example of the ease with which Harari’s popularized dark visions can be dissected and revealed as sensationalist tripe. As author Darshana Narayanan summarizes, “The best-selling author is a gifted storyteller and popular speaker. But he sacrifices science for sensationalism, and his work is riddled with errors”. Based on my reading, the same critiques apply to the books “COVID-19: The Great Reset” and “The Great Narrative” by Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret. But the power of the WEF and its global army of trained agents to direct public policy at both national and transnational levels forces us all to take their poorly reasoned arguments and dark musings seriously.
It is one thing to criticize someone else’s vision of the future, but quite another to develop a compelling alternative. I have been traveling the world, trying to advance the cause of medical freedom and help others make sense out of what we have all experienced over the last three years. During these travels, I have found that many leaders from the various independently developed resistance groups often speak of similar things; a rejection of centralized authority, a need to build organizational structures which will not merely recapitulate the same leadership failures of present social, political, and corporate structures, and a vague sense of a more decentralized world. This is often posited as the alternative to the globally centralized, utilitarian/marxist/command economy, Malthusian corporatist/fascist vision promoted by the WEF, and increasingly by the United Nations, World Trade Organization, Bank of International Settlements/Central banks and the World Health Organization.
Is the dark vision of the fourth industrial revolution, transhumanism, fusion of man and machine, and total centralized control by a small group of unelected elite Overlords inevitable, as Klaus Schwab and Yuval Noah Harari would have us believe?
I recently learned of Christopher Michael Langan, who has been quietly developing one alternative vision which incorporates many aspects of what I have heard many global leaders within the medical freedom movement beginning to explore. Mr. Langen refers to this vision and model of an alternative future as “The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe” (CTMU). When I first read about these ideas, they struck me as truly transformational in the same way that my first introduction to Mattias Desmet’s “Mass formation” theories have been. It is useful to remember that this theory of Mr. Langan was developed well before the COVIDcrisis, even though much of what he envisions and describes is prescient in retrospect.
By all accounts, Mr. Langen may be one of the most intelligent currently living individuals on the planet, and like many with an IQ measured greater than 150, it can be a challenge for the vast majority of us to follow some of his more advanced logic and writing. In his commitment to living a "double-life strategy", on one side a regular guy, doing his job and exchanging pleasantries, and on the other side coming home to perform equations in his head and working in isolation on his Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe, I find many similarities with the way I have chosen to live my own life. Plus, he lives with his wife Gina (née LoSasso), a clinical neuropsychologist, in northern Missouri where they own and operate a horse ranch. I don’t know about you, but this sounds like someone I would like to meet and spend some time with.
Christopher Langen, weightlifter, construction worker, cowboy, forest service firefighter, farmhand, for over twenty years, a bouncer on Long Island, New York, and a super genius.
Here is a lightly edited transcript of the video clip attached above:
We're approaching a juncture, and this is really a bifurcation into possible futures. One of those futures will take us toward a centralized form of government. It's more or less like a hive. A certain cohort of elites are going to be in charge and everybody else is going to be... They'll be the overclass and everybody else will be a kind of underclass, which serves them and does pretty much what they're told.
On the other hand, we can go in another direction, which is to distribute responsibility and decision making power over everybody. And of course, that takes enhanced intelligence and responsibility. So there's a certain challenge associated with this. We have to make up our minds very quickly how we're going to do this. If we want to distribute responsibility, then the first thing that we need is a sound understanding of human nature and the nature of reality, and this is what I propose to bring to bear on the problem.
Mr. Langen refers to the two alternative futures which he has focused on as involving singularities, alternative nodes through which humanity will pass. His language for describing these two consists of “Metareligion as the human singularity” and the “Technology singularity”. The technology singularity which he envisions is very aligned with the fourth industrial revolution/transhumanism dystopian corporatist/fascist government described by Schwab, Malleret, and Harari.
What I find particularly relevant to the current challenge of visualizing an alternative to the mutterings of the WEF and its acolytes is Christopher’s vision of a separate reality from the one that they wish to use in "shaping” a future.
Mr. Langen’s 2002 publication “The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe: A New Kind of Reality Theory” provides an example of the densely reasoned complex explanations which he often provides, in which he discusses concepts which rely on language and terms which he has had to personally develop because the English language is not sufficient to allow him to adequately express his ideas and insights. Fortunately for neophytes such as myself, his 2018 essay “Metareligion as the Human Singularity” (published in the journal “Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy”, vol. 14, no. 1) is much more accessible.
If, like me, you find the vision, thought and insights which I have tried to capture with the quotes below to be useful in imagining a better, decentralized future which offers a more desirable vision of the future, I recommend reading the entire work and then venturing a journey into the many podcast interviews and writings of this home grown American genius and philosopher.
To understand his own identity, man requires a coherent and therefore monic self-model reflecting its psychological coherence and relating it to all levels of reality. That is, man requires a valid interpretation of the human individual in society, and of the individual and society in reality at large. This interpretation must take the form of an unbroken correspondence spanning the extended relationship between man, as an inhabitant of reality, and reality in its most basic and universal form; man must see himself as an integral part of reality, and reality as an extension of his own being within a single unified ontology or metaphysics. In short, man and reality must share a common metaphysical identity.
Where metaphysics is a language expressing the relationship between mental and physical reality, spirituality can be understood as the metaphysical essence of human identity, and religion as its organizational manifestation. In its various benign forms, religion provides man with self-understanding and a sense of community ... a model of the individual and his or her relationship to other people, society, and reality at large. Religion tells people who they are, and mankind what it is, by establishing their relationship to the global environment on the spiritual level; it is a binary relationship of man to his real environment, and where the global environment of each human being includes all others, the relationship of mankind to itself.
The spiritual model of self, the extended man-reality relationship required by religion, is thus a stratification of human identity from the individual to ultimate reality, the level of reality that cannot be explained in terms of anything prior to itself or any sort of exterior embedment. This follows from the fact that man is embedded in reality and thus shares all of its most general and ubiquitous properties, up to human limitations of structure and dynamics. Parallel to this degree of extension is the outward extension of self that is sought in certain Asian religious traditions; the self becomes ever more expansive as its hidden depths are plumbed.
But here we must note that the phrase “ultimate reality” is necessarily a partial description of God, incorporated in the (otherwise variously defined) identity of all viable monotheistic religions. Any God not incorporating ultimate reality could exist only in a properly inclusive reality partially beyond His influence and creative power, and would thus come up short in virtually every major strain of monotheism. On the other hand, this description holds regardless of any more specific properties incorporated in various definitions of God.
DUALISM: REALITY TORN IN TWO
In mainstream social and economic theory, a human being is understood as a mechanistic automaton driven by individual self-interest and governed by impersonal laws of nature and rules of behaviorism. Human automata are subject to conditioning on the basis of individual self-interest, which is a function of the individual’s pleasure and happiness, freedom from want, pain, and sadness, and standards of biological fitness including survival and reproduction, all of which inhabit a standardized economy with a monetary metric. Man is thus simplistically viewed as an economic agent subject to monetary control, through centralization of which the entire future of mankind can in principle be mechanistically determined by the calculated pushing of buttons. Obviously, this dualistic view of man represents a complete negation of human dignity and sovereignty, reducing the human race to cattle. It is also incompatible with any kind of religion other than that referred to by Marx as an “opiate of the masses”.
Sound familiar? This is the vision which unites the writings of Schwab, Malleret, and Harari, and by extension the World Economic Forum. This “man as economic agent” is essentially the fundamental unifying model currently shared by the WEF and its globalist affiliate organizations.
Langen then launches into some definitions before describing his alternative.
For present purposes, a “singularity” is a point at which a system must undergo a directional break, jump through a limit, or be redefined in order to survive regardless of how it may evolve before or after. Accordingly, it can be understood as a kind of systemic destiny, an inevitable convergence of possible paths or trajectories of systemic evolution. Paths converge on points, and where such a point marks a sharp change in the smooth overall trajectory of a system, it comprises a kind of systemic “metapoint” which can be seen as marking a systemic mutation or change of inertia. This provides a tentative mathematical conceptualization of “singularity” for social systems.
The related forms of dualism thus far discussed — Cartesian dualism, naturalism, NOMA [the “non-overlapping magisteria” of science and religion], and so on — are opposed to the human need for a coherent spiritual identity. This implies a bifurcation or divergence, a human evolutionary choice between two possible adaptations or destinies respectively corresponding to the anthropic and technological aspects of an impending “singular” transformation. Each possible destiny corresponds to the dominance of one aspect over the other, and may be associated with its own conventional type of singularity.
On one side is the Human Singularity, a mass realization of the expansive spiritual identity of the human species. Basically, this is the mass spiritual awakening that we have been led to expect by, e.g., certain currents in “New Age” thought. The prototype for this kind of singularity is the Omega Point of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, representing an evolutionary terminus and divine spiritual unification event through which mankind, and reality itself, will achieve “Christ-Consciousness” and be forever transformed.
On the other side is the Tech Singularity, seminally formulated by the celebrated mathematician John von Neumann as the approaching juncture at which “technological progress will become incomprehensively rapid and complicated”, prior to which “the ever-accelerating progress of technology ... gives the appearance of approaching some essential singularity [italicized for emphasis] in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue” (Ulam, 1958). In short, von Neumann foresaw an uncontrollable technological quickening, a sudden acceleration of complexity followed by the transformation (or extinction) of humanity.
Most discussions of the Tech Singularity have been naive to the point of disingenuity, boiling down to starry-eyed encomiums to the power of human intelligence to inventively couple with reality on the physical level of being using technological marvels both real and imagined, including implants, prosthetics, genetic engineering, virtual realities, and above all, a merging of human intelligence with AI. The problem with such discussions is that they seem to inhabit a socioeconomic and political vacuum, whereas in fact, the singularity concept is fraught with worrisome complications involving economic and sociopolitical factors apart from which it cannot be properly evaluated.
The Human and Tech Singularities relate to each other by a kind of duality; the former is extended and spacelike, representing the even distribution of spiritual and intellectual resources over the whole of mankind, while the latter is a compact, pointlike concentration of all resources in the hands of just those who can afford full access to the best and most advanced technology. Being opposed to each other with respect to the distribution of the resources of social evolution, they are also opposed with respect to the structure of society; symmetric distribution of the capacity for effective governance corresponds to a social order based on individual freedom and responsibility, while extreme concentration of the means of governance leads to a centralized, hive-like system at the center of which resides an oligarchic concentration of wealth and power, with increasing scarcity elsewhere due to the addictive, self-reinforcing nature of privilege. (Note that this differs from the usual understanding of individualism, which is ordinarily associated with capitalism and juxtaposed with collectivism; in fact, both capitalism and collectivism, as they are monopolistically practiced on the national and global scales, lead to oligarchy and a loss of individuality for the vast majority of people. A Human Singularity is something else entirely, empowering individuals rather than facilitating their disempowerment.)
The existence of two possible singularities presupposes a point of bifurcation or divergence beyond which the evolutionary momentum of mankind must carry it. Presently, all of the momentum belongs to the Tech Singularity; it is preferred by the financial, corporate, and governmental interests which drive the general economy. This momentum is reinforced by the seeming unavailability of alternatives, i.e., the nonexistence of any other track onto which society might be steered in order to escape an oligarchical AI lockdown. It is one thing for humankind to awaken en masse to its impending enslavement through a seemingly inevitable Tech Singularity; it is quite another to have a superior alternative clearly in view.
In order to reach any alternate destination whatsoever, humanity must understand what has been driving it toward the Tech Singularity. At this point, the reason is clear: the virtually automatic concentration of wealth and power, which has been observed to occur under both capitalism and socialism, fractionates humanity into an overclass and an underclass between which all else is crushed out of existence as though by the jaws of a vise. That is, the top and bottom levels of society become the jaws of a vise which, due to the screwing down of the upper jaw against the anvil-like lower jaw, crushes the middle class and all meaningful competition out of existence, thus normalizing the hive through the economic, physical, and psychological standardization of its drones and workers.
For reasons that should by now be evident, let us call this process a “parasitic divergence” — i.e., an organized divergence of humanity into a parasitic overclass and a relatively impoverished underclass serving as its mind-controlled host, mirroring the gruesome effects of certain obligate parasites on the organisms they attack — and acknowledge that it is driven by the self-reinforcing and therefore accelerating acquisition of wealth, power, and technological control by the rich. Left to run away with itself, this process ultimately leads to a “singular” concentration of wealth and power ... a kind of sociopolitical-economic “black hole” that never stops gravitating. As the top jaw of the vise grows smaller, denser, and stronger, the bottom jaw grows larger and weaker; and as human utility becomes increasingly concentrated, every significant increase in the wealth of the overclass translates into a greater amount of misery for the underclass, arbitrarily diminishing the net utility of mankind.
Parasitic divergences have occurred many times in history, but the present one is different. Due to the double whammy of globalization and powerful surveillance and coercion technology, the one now in progress is geographically ubiquitous and quite possibly irreversible. If humanity is to save itself from the insectile, hive-like future associated with a Tech Singularity, the Human Singularity must prevail, empowering mankind to exert sufficient control over the production, distribution, and application of technology to prevent its unlimited oligarchical abuse. To bring this about, it is not enough to merely distribute a cognitive avoidance mechanism out of which the moneyed elite can buy and bribe their way as usual, given the absence of a well-defined alternative direction in which humanity can proceed; rather, an alternative direction must be defined and universally distributed in cognitive and attitudinal form. In short, in order to have a meaningful mass awakening, the content of the awakening must be defined and distributed to the members of humanity, thus immunizing them against parasitic mind control. Because this content must be spiritual, the involvement of religion is unavoidable.
I think that these words and vision speak for themselves. I once again remind that they were first published in 2018. As far as I am concerned, this essay gets the closest to the emergent sense of an alternative future consistent with what many in the medical freedom movement have been groping towards of any that I have ever read.
I look forward to learning from your comments and reactions to the insights of Mr. Christopher Michael Langan, American philosopher and genius.
The kindle version of the book , “Lies My GOV’T Told Me” should be out next week and the hardbound book early December (the dates on Amazon are wrong - the publisher is just waiting for final conformation of dates before he changes them there).
I have had so many people write amazing things about the book and about me, that it is kind of embarrassing. But here are the first couple of quotes from the back cover of the book:
"In order to have a meaningful mass awakening, the content of the awakening must be defined and distributed to the members of humanity, thus immunizing them against parasitic mind control. Because this content must be spiritual, the involvement of religion is unavoidable." He says it so well. Either we accept the greater reality of God, or the elite god-men will control everyone else.
I'm not sure he's talking about the God of the Bible. It may be a god of our own making, which is useless.
Based on an interview at the url I shared elsewhere, he shares Scripture (John 1:1) and discusses a proof for the existence of God. If anything, the "god of our own making" is the result of the Technical Singularity he describes.
Presumably you are referring to "the God of the Bible." Like all others, made by us in the image of our own highest aspirations.
Mockers abound. You have your time. How one approaches the Scripture makes a difference on what is gleaned from it. Some strike out because God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble. I challenge you to check your attitude at the door, and read the book of Matthew in one sitting from beginning to end with an open heart, even a prayerful one.
That is B.S. We could never possibly create the God of the Bible, who spoke the world into existence (John 1) He is far beyond our comprehension. Show some humility. He is coming back as the righteous Judge.
Yep! That’s truth. We could never “ create” a GOD better than the one true God.
What proof do you have that the God of the Bible is a god made by us in the image of our highest aspirations?
The Bible is written by those of us who claim by faith, i.e., without proof, that they were inspired or guided by 'God.' Why do you require proof of me if faith is your guiding light (O ye of little faith ;-)? Where true faith and belief are concerned proof is not required or even logically possible, and in the case of religion it is frowned upon as requiring it can amount to blasphemy. The awesome power of faith is indisputable, but it can be faith in anything, including mRNA vaccines or even Dr Malone.
So basically you can state an opinion as fact without even doing the work that paleographies do in establishing the authenticity of ancient texts who find staggeringly more confirmation that the four Gospels of the New Testament are authentic historical accounts than they can provide to prove that Plato wrote Republic.
People chose to put their faith in a lot of different things based on a lot of different criteria. What they want or don’t want; what they know experientially; what they know through scientific inquiry. It is not wise to put our faith in things that are not based on truth. So we all have to examine how we are determining what is truth.
Maybe you should read the entire Bible and consider how you determine truth before you write it off as fiction.
There are several versions of the Gospel. The Council of Nicea in 325 AD shit-canned several of them. Of the four that remain, there are many inconsistencies and contradictions. Thomas Jefferson's THE LIFE AND MORALS OF JESUS OF NAZARETH is Jefferson's cut/paste of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John that contains no stories of magic and which appear in all four books.
Not only are their historic and logical inconsistencies in the Bible, there are some things inserted, words allegedly spoken by Jesus (John 14:6) that seem incompatible with Jesus the Jewish rabbi.
And the answer to you questioning Jesus’ words as being inconsistent with Jesus the Jewish Rabbi in John 14:6 are in 14:7:
“Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.
Oneness with the Father
7 “If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; from now on you know Him, and have seen Him.”
Jesus is more than just a Jewish Rabbi. He is God who became man in order to offer Himself as the Perfect Sacrificial Lamb to pay the debt we cannot pay ourselves.
People complain that God does not intervene in human affairs enough when situations bother them. But when He does prove His existence and His nature sinful man does not like what He sees.
John 3:16-21 says it better:
“For God so loved the world, that He gave His fnonly begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.
17 For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.
18 “He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
19 “This is the judgment, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil.
20 “For everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come to the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.
21 “But he who practices the truth comes to the Light, so that his deeds may be manifested as having been wrought in God.”
There are differences that would be expected in eyewitness accounts--that actually support their authenticity. What are the historic and logical inconsistencies that trouble you?
Would you actually prefer one man’s account that he developed to ease his own lack of faith in an all powerful Creator God who made him feel ashamed of his own pet sin issues?
LOL Have you any idea what the "Thomas Jefferson Bible" is? I'll be happy to list two or three inconsistencies in the Gospels if you can document what "pet sin issues" Thomas Jefferson suffered from.
First of all, the "virgin birth" is not mentioned in every Gospel account. Jefferson, like millions of others, rejected the Egyptian myth of a virgin birth. Secondly, there are the so-called accounts of Jesus' last words on the cross. John 10:6 is the verse that gives me the most trouble. I find it obnoxiously narcissistic of Jesus to claim that "no one comes to the Father except through me". It seems totally out of character for a man who has been preaching as a rabbi for three years to condemn 99% of his fellow Jews to eternal hellfire for not believing in him. And, of course, there is that nonsense about Good Friday and Easter. If Jesus was put in a tomb on Friday and rose on Sunday, how does that fulfill his claim that he would be in the ground for three days and three nights.
I am comfortable believing that Jesus was a disciple of John the Baptist. After all, he never performed any miracles before his baptism. And I am convinced that he was crucified by Rome because, as heir to the throne of Jerusalem's king, he was a threat to Rome.
Have you studied the Old Testament prophecies that foretold the virgin birth of Jesus and MANY other detailed things that would make sure that people would be able to recognize the Messiah when He would come?
You can believe what you want--and you will, but your laughter and confidence in writing off the Bible on the basis of your personal incredulity shows that you are not seriously trying to decide whether the Bible is true or not.
The Bible is a consistent revelation of God and Man and the purpose for life from Genesis to Revelation. But you wouldn’t be able to see that unless you read it through with the mind that you would obey it if it proved to be true.
The teachings of the Old Testament promise the coming of Jesus and give the whys and wherefores of what He did and said.
Jefferson discounted miracles. And apparently that fits your concept of god or your world view. That is your prerogative.
I would rather discover truth and live according to it rather than decide what I want it to be true and end up deceived.
Jesus told his followers that he would give just one proof that he was actually the Son of God. His promise was that he would lie in the grave for three days and three nights before rising from the dead.
Ironically, the churches' Good Friday - Easter fantasy does not meet this criteria. But it's close, right?
Nice catch. Call it "Weekend Syndrome." The ancient texts must be made to fit current social constructs. Easter Monday just wouldn't fly. Any idea when the "fantasy" was instituted?
According to the now-defunct Worldwide Church of God, Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday (immediately preceding the Passover Sabbath) and was raised from the grave on the Saturday Sabbath, three days later.
In 325 AD, the Council of Nicea followed the new church'es #1 rule: If you can't beat 'em, join 'em. Sunday became the Sabbath and the Romans stopped worshipping Cybelle and her lover/son & switched to Jesus. It was an easy swap - Easter replaced Passover and Jews were sidelined in favor of the new cult.
https://comeoutofher.org/emperor-constantine-created-easter-to-replace-passover/
Great stuff, sir. Just goes to show, where there's a (common)weal, there is a way.
Poor Cybelle, violating all the rules, both moral and evolutionary. Guess the Romans must have been, too, in their long decline. As for us...???
Seeing their empire crumbling, the Romans substituted Jesus for Jupiter. The USA abandoned Jesus in favor of the God of Climate Change. The BRICS will soon claim their rightful place as rulers of the planet. Won't they be disappointed to see the mess we've left them?!
Faith is the ability to believe in and trust in love and intangible proof. What you define as proof is more appropriate for the epsteins and brandons of the world, materialistic ai singularity bank.
LOL, he's batting 1000 on his statement that all shall die in their appointed time. Is dying one of your highest aspirations? Why would anyone create a god that tells them they have to die? Much less spend eternity in a place where God has chosen to withdraw his presence, aka "hell" if they chose to reject him...
You don’t have to “believe” in hell ( or God), to go to hell. If you turn away from God, you’re choosing your path. Read C.S. Lewis, “ Mere Christianity”. He was an atheist & writes beautifully about God. It’s not preachy, it’s thought based brilliance. He writes like he’s talking to a friend, patient & clear.
Dying is not an aspiration, it is an inevitability!! And it's a great motivation for people to create a god that in many cases offers a respite, especially an eternal one, from it. Not to mention a threat of 'hell' if they don't conduct themselves in a socially acceptable fashion.
LOL, I'll take the bait. Lets go back in prehistoric times and imagine BEFORE religion was invented in your "its all made up" scenario. Who would bother to invent it? Not the alphas, they just kill whoever gets in their way and death doesn't scare them. The betas perhaps? Sure, they'd try it because maybe it gives some leverage over the alphas. So beta tells alpha the reason the volcano just went off is because alpha did something against "god" that is actually just something that makes beta mad. Alpha thinks "yeah, it sure did! I better stop!" Then beta tells alpha "If you also don't stop doing this other thing, its going to go off again and "god" will kill you for it this time!" Time passes and alpha does this other thing. The volcano is silent. Alpha immediately goes and kills beta for being a liar who played him. And that's the end of the new made up out of thin air religion.... From the perspective of evolution, its impossible. The benefit is quite temporal and making it up results in being selected out of the gene pool.
Hell is only for people that don’t accept Jesus into their hearts . It’s that simple. Jesus died on the cross so we didn’t HAVE to “ conduct in socially acceptable fashion”. It’s not
“good deed” related at all. Jesus was perfect, we are not, but we can try. And that’s where Grace comes in. That’s the beautiful thing about my GOD. 😇💕
Didn't say anything about 'good deeds', but since you mentioned it, all deeds have unintended consequences. While this is not a reason to forgo good intentions, will 'your GOD' judge you by intentions or results? But it doesn't matter because the church has invented the magic of eternal life through His Gracious forgiveness. Seems like a pretty sketchy motivation for 'we can try.'
If there is no life after this one, why does it matter? In fact why would anyone in their right mind spend one second of the limited time you have here talking about things that don't exist with those who think they do? Talk about insane.
It matters precisely because there is no life (as we know it) after this one; and I wish a continuation of this evolving life for as long as possible through our children and our children's children. Your faith in an afterlife in human form (if I understand correctly) miraculously rendered "divine" leads logically to a desire for "end times" ASAP, a horror show we have been on the verge of staging since 1945, the fragile continued avoidance of which is our greatest accomplishment and gives me hope, so far.
For the priesthood to (deliberately) put Revelations at the end of the New Testament is to take Christianity back to the horrors of the vengeful god of the Old Testament, replacing Christlike aspirations for humanity with the unChristlike coercive specter of terror. I see the prophesies as either metaphorical (i.e., not literal) or, if literal, the ravings of mad men who are already in a personal hell and wish for others to join them there.
There is much in the Bible and in all religions that is vitally important to human culture, and there is much that is factually false, but metaphorically true. Many of the larger historical facts are provable to a degree by scientific means and many are not amenable to proof, particularly at the individual level, like Plato's authorship as mentioned in another thread here. Religious faith requires Truth, a Platonic ideal, while science is simply a method of relentless inquiry (that will not allow Final Answers short of disproving its own usefulness) which true Faith does not allow. The best science is always inconclusive but ironically the technology derived from it is nevertheless the source of our "God-given" dominion over the earth.
Insanity is a subjective qualium and flinging it carelessly about in accusation can have a boomerang effect.
LOL, if this is what qualifies as knowledge, logic and pragmatism in your mind, all I can do is chuckle. The afterlife is not in human form according to the Bible you claim to know so well. And most people do not long for the "end times" which in the context of the portions of Revelations you are referring to, are actually *not* the end times at all, but rather a seven year period of unprecedented transition and upheaval. As for science and "true Faith" being somehow being mutually exclusive, how can that logically be when according to you, it is a merely a method of inquiry? Faith actually requires inquiry and study, which if you knew the Bible as well as you claim, you would already know. Its a very, very basic principle. Look I'm not trying to convert you or brow beat you, but you really should at least know what you're talking about when you claim to know what you're talking about...
Spot on.
Not necessarily useless. And that would be a small percentage of “ believers.” I think his main point is the separation of how we view ourselves in daily situations, and how we contribute to the whole of civilization. That’s it. Keeping it simple, it makes SO much sense. Also, people tend to be lazy when it comes to thinking in general, so for most to come up with their own “ original God” isn’t probable.
I love this! All of it. I get it & think this guy is Tech world’s worst fear. It makes a lot more sense to go in this “God” direction, if still possible, than working toward an uprising after slavery from Tech world begins. We can’t even communicate effectively now, concerning virus , warnings, etc. It would take a secretly executed ( national) communication, that would have to be encrypted or old school. ( but, free travel most likely will be limited) God is how we fight this. My God has never lost a battle. That’s why church wasn’t declared an “ essential” service. The current elite establishment is scared of that kind of power.
He is talking about God in the generic sense, as Creator God in the Bible, before the fall if man.
You mean “god in a box”?
The new age refers to god not as king but as source of creation. Like the source of power or electricity.
The "new age" god seems oddly identical to the one worshipped for centuries by Taoists and Daoists.
If u understand worship as what westerners do with science and gravity yes. They have a priori claims and truths.
Exactly, sometimes human intelligence gets in the way of this truth
I think he is talking about God in the generic sense as in Genesis (Bible) before the fall of Man.
Apart from the One True God, Who delivers the unity of His disciples, and transforms their minds (against parasitic mind control; i.e. the conformity to the world) ((Romans 12:1-2, among other scriptures)), being renewed in their minds, many, if not most, of the members will not agree on the 'definition' and 'content of the awakening'. Even many of those who begin anew in the hopeful new and improved awakening, will fall and depart. This is overt and troublesome in the church now and has been for thousands of years on our imperfect globe. It shall not be perfected until He deems. The guy is brilliant, but all this is laid out plain in the knowledge of His Spirit, The Word, and it's relation and study has already told millions, if not billions, the same.
This seemed like a systems analysis view of the world. Tech system vs. spiritual system. But I see life as more of a human organizational problem. A small percentage of humans are just different and cause problems for the majority. They are insatiable and would consume and/or own the entire planet if there were no constraints. They enjoy dominating and controlling others - even owning others. Obtaining monopoly power is the game. Unless we can figure out a way to keep these people from positions where they can gain control and harm others, we will continually find ourselves returning to this environment.
Catherine Austin Fitts of Solari envisions developing decentralized, local alternatives.I find that very appealing, but I don't see how it will withstand the war that will be brought against it. I think the author is correct that some kind of alternative cognitive mass awakening is required, but how? Mass non-compliance is the only chance but I can't see it happening. I almost think if you really got through to people that the next step is slavery, most of them would sign up willingly. I just read India has 92% of its population under the digital ID system. I'm sure China is already there and there isn't much resistance happening in the US. Information has been weaponized and so many people are simply not curious. They are just sponges soaking up whatever they're fed.
I'm praying for divine intervention.
"Unless we can figure out a way to keep these people from positions where they can gain control and harm others, we will continually find ourselves returning to this environment."
I'm sure you've heard the phrase, "Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely"
Like the alcoholic who attempts to drink responsibly to solve their drinking problem, it never occurs to them that they should stop trying the controlled drinking scheme and simply stop drinking alcohol.
So it i seems with humans governing other humans. We keep trying to find ways to control people rather than seeing control as the problem, not the solution.
Plenty of people obtain positions of power and "control" or management over others, but they don't turn it into an all you can eat buffet. If you've ever come across one of these all you can eat people, domination is their goal, pure and simple. And in a group or team, they suck all the energy out of the group. If you ran into a serial killer, you wouldn't say he shouldn't be controlled, that control is the problem.
If I may put a finer point on it.
Alcoholics are to alcohol as control freaks are to authority.
The qabal likes this saying because they want you to avoid taking their power. Like the one ring. Just give it to sauron.
Divine intervention has already occurred.
Homeland Security isn’t doing anything without Brandon puppeteers approval. It is being directed from the top. This Nation has been sold out by traitors throughout our Government.
They have done lots of damage abroad supported by lies and they got away with it. It is (perhaps) the first time that they are doing the damage within, visible to everyone.
A few years ago I read a "transhumanist" novel. I immediately recognized two things: first, transhumanists are males in an arrested state of development with a maturation level of about 15. This has nothing to do with intelligence, and everything to do with maturity. Second, no woman who is or has been a mother could ever do anything but laugh at the idiocy that is transhumanism. Transhumanism requires that the practitioner have absolutely no empathy, and a little boy's love of cool gadgets. That is it. The end.
You nailed it!
Thank you, my fellow woman, for speaking the obvious!
Men are almost all boys, IMHO, and letting them run a society seems to run the risk of having it devolve into a technological or economic "Lord Of The Flies" scenario.
War making unnecessarily being their #1 insanity.
But falling in love with their gadgets and turning from the magic and mystery that is life, itself, our Conscious Universe, from fawn to flower, from supernova to atom, towards their own "false light" creations, is perhaps ultimately just as toxic and deadly a mistake.
However, the awake males can perhaps reach them. "Sacred Geometry" on Gaia TV is pretty stunning, and the real answers to the Big Questions are emerging, perhaps even as rapidly as the rise of the techie Universe.
May Consciousness Win!!
I always hesitate to make too many pronouncements about the superiority of women in this regard, since the CEO's of the war-machine corporations are women, and we've had a few Secretaries of State and other cabinet members....ahem. "Can't we just drone this guy"? comes to mind. There are too many women who have accepted that you have to become like men to be successful. But yes, it is infuriating that the psychopaths of both sexes tend to rise to the top.
I agree that the women in power today are as bad, or even worse, than the men.
But, women have been subjected to a 6000 year campaign of repression, abuse, and male domination.
They are "out boying the boys" to succeed, imho.
Read Saharasia, by James DeMeo.
Study the Iroquois, the Minoans, and other balanced or Matriarchal societies. They are VERY different than ours, and neither the women, nor the men are sociopaths.
It's a deep subject, but one well worth studying.
Our world is not, and the two sexes are not, what we have been taught to believe they are.
One society that opened my eyes was the matriarchal society of Tibet pre-1960 in the book Leaving Mother Lake. It was an arrangement I had never considered, but which made so much sense to me. Yes, I agree that we have no idea what societies have existed successfully in the past or what is possible. I will check out Saharasia. I also recommend the book The Dawn of Everything, about pre-modern societies that challenge our notion of what is possible for humans.
Thanks for the reccomendations, I will look at them!
They is a great little book about how the early American Feminists realized what was possible, and much, much more healthy, by spending time with the tribes in Upstate New York.
Members of the Iroquois Confederation.
And, some say our three branches of government with the checks and balances come from them as well.
I think balanced or matriarchal societies are in a lot of our blood and DNA.
We've just been brain-washed that all this endless war and male domination is "normal." It is anything but!
That's what psychopaths do.
Bill Gates, Zuck Markerberg et al
Android data
Love it. So spot on.
🤣 🎯
"Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness." One doesn't need to be a genius to recognize that a Being that transcends time and space is the only answer to the question of the vastness of the universe, the infinitesimal reality of matter, and the past eternity of creation prior to Genesis 1. 2 Peter speaks to a reality we should all thoughtfully consider, "...knowing that shortly I must put off my tent..." We will all put off our tents one day, if the Lord tarries. That's the reality we can ignore or dismiss at our peril.
My reaction? Sounds like the One World Religion of the three Abrahamic world religions being promoted... MINUS the actual Jesus, the Messiah. No thanks. Both modern day Islam and Judaism consider Christians as 'polytheists', and therefore idolaters. They do not understand the concept of Trinity and reject it. I am not a Christ-Conscience or God-Conscience seeker, I am a child of our Holy Father... reconciled by the atoning sacrifice of the Word made Flesh, on a Roman cross. His substitutionary death for my sins. He rose again, so shall I.. and all who put their FAITH and HOPE in Him alone.
Well said!
Amen! This is the true awakening. All the other human means are just another path to hell.
No that would be the globalists’ PC syncretism. On the other hand, the CTMU Meta-religion focuses on the metaphysical logic or Logos underlying many spiritual beliefs.
I don't think metareligion adheres to what you are saying. It sounds more like Babylon.
Since Jesus wasn't mentioned, I think you are right.
I did a search for meta-religion and while I don't know if what I found agrees with Mr. Langan's views, it was a disturbing website. http://www.supra-id.org/meta-religion
Chris Langan has mentioned Christ quite often actually.
It's not enough to mention Christ. One must recognize His uniqueness, that He was fully human and fully God while on earth and now sits at the right hand of God the Father. He said in John 14:6 that He is the only way to the Father. There is only one way to be saved. I cannot go along with this idea of just declaring all religions the same and deciding we'll just all get along. We must come to God on His terms, not ours. Christianity is unique because our God came down to us, rather than making us claw our way up to try to find the right way and to determine how much is good enough. At one point, the gospels tell that some of Jesus' followers were leaving because following him had become too costly. He asked Peter, are also going to leave? Peter replied, no, you have the words of life. That's where I am. Only Jesus has the words of life, not Mohammed or Buddha or any other religious leader.
I wish Christians would read C.S. Lewis more.....
Sigh.
Or even just listen to Jesus, lol.
Sorry if I offend, but direct Revelation is still real.
But the Christian must test "revelation" by what the Bible says. The Holy Spirit will not reveal something to us that contradicts the Bible.
My position, after decades of study is that the Bible contradicts itself a lot. I do not make that statement lightly. Nevertheless, in order to grow in Christianity, I had to reconcile my relationship with Jesus's and his teaching/healing with all the "other" statements in the Bible. This takes time, sincere prayer, and a listening heart.
Many great Christians have gone before us and wrestled these issues, and I have worked to learn from many of them, as well as to develop my own relationship with the Holy Spirit, and pray over the difficult questions.
Jesus gave us all the answers. We just miss them all too often.
Nothing in the rest of the Bible can compare with Him. His teaching is beyond compare, and men lose the thread, over and over and over again. Love is the one and only answer.
CTMU definitely supports the specialness of Christ, Logos made flesh, member of the Holy Trinity, etc.
Then why not just talk about that? Why add on these incomprehensible ramblings?
He also spoke of the incorporation of certain aspects of Asian religious concepts--New Agey if you ask me. I sure hope that this community does not turn to deciding that this is the way humanity should be filling spiritual void in order to correct a mechanistic view of human worth. The dangers posed by a one world religion go hand and hand with a one world government. And the Bible tells us how that works out...
The one world religion promoting one world government, which is politically correct paradoxical syncretism, is not the same as explaining the metaphysical logic underlying many religious beliefs. They're opposite in many ways.
Can you give an example of what you mean?
Politically correct paradoxical syncretism boils down to, basically, the belief that all religions are equally valid. Truth and morality are subjective. Contradictions among different belief system can be resolved by, well, just ignore those and remember that faith and logic never mix! And if some real life conflicts bubble up because of this, the Government and those that control it can act as God to resolve any issues. The CTMU, on the other hand, uses advanced logic to see what religious beliefs can be logically justified. Reason and faith are coupled. There's no reason to blindly trust any government or central authority as a logically sophisticated people can all use the universal nature of logic to distributively resolve issues.
Check this out. https://leohohmann.com/2022/11/07/the-one-world-religion-on-full-display-as-fake-faith-leaders-join-globalist-predators-to-push-earth-worship-at-u-n-cop-27-conference/#more-11791
I opened some of the links in the article. It's time to look into this closer. Again, ugh.
I often look at lifesitenews.com although I am not Catholic. They've been expressing concern about the pope. Once they had a headline, "Is the Pope Catholic?" I was wondering, is the pope a Christian? Doesn't look like it.
Ugh. Not loving the looks of that.
The duality of centralized control in the hands of elites vs. decentralized democratic humanistic political organization seems to me to be as old as civilization. Same oppressor beast, dressed up now in techno clothing. Same fearful subservient and misinformed populace, now made so through censorship as opposed to by lack of education. I think it is reflective of an irresolvable conundrum of politics: give too much power to the elites and the power will go to their heads and they will become oppressors; give too much power to the people and they will make decisions out of ignorance, lack of experience and become disordered -- a kind of ochlocracy of the ignorant.
The Remains Of The Day, with Anthony Hopkins is a movie that explores this dichotomy: showing the folly of both the elites and the incompetence of the inexpert. Democracy tends to give the nod to the people, however, ill informed they may be, hoping and possibly assuming (without evidence) that in the long run the people will figure out its mistakes and make better choices. Aristocracy or elitism assumes its decisions will be better informed, ignoring how its judgments will be skewed by its own narcissistic biases. The former is a danger because it is too uninformed and inexpert; the latter a danger because it is not as well informed nor as expert as it thinks.
The United States, and indeed most Parliamentary democracies have attempted to resolve this through representation, assuming that representatives (aka politicians) will be more skillful at directing government in a way that is salutary to the public. While seemingly a reasonable compromise, this solution has proved itself to be riddled with flaws, including the tendency of such representatives to be influenced by party loyalty, dark money, and election tampering.
Is there any solution? Probably not a perfect one, but given the tendency of the powerful to usurp even greater power, and those more distant from those they represent to be less answerable to them, I think the solution is to weaken centralized authority and keep the power more decentralized and close to the local community. We also need to find a way to engage the public more in the political process. In Brazil, voting is mandatory. In this country, you participate if you feel like it. This election I voted on 5 separate bond issues and 7 or more referenda. I had no awareness of many of these referenda. If we don't have a lively engaged and respectful debate about politics on an ongoing basis in local town halls, we will never learn to respect our opponents, never learn from them, and become ever more entrenched in our monocular polarized viewpoints.
Thank you for not talking in word salad. I’m not an ignorant person but some of this supposedly genius person’s thoughts are so wordy and complex they make my head explode.
Scholars and specialists have their own language. Aka military slang acronyms
When people accepted a dnw upgrade from me, their comprension went way up. One person at instapundit i remember as not understanding much ofbwhat i wrote until they got a dna upgrade.
U want to know how real democracies work? Look at american idol and donetsk elections
Klaus and his queer 1st mate are failing. The club is desperately panicking. They have the brazen stupidity attempting "the inevitable" but not the mind power, nor the resources to make it happen.
Hmmm…quick listen to an interview where he speaks of the need for eugenics (to improve the gene pool) and that individuals doing what they want to do (you mean freedom?) have caused societies decline. These musings frankly seem more in line with WEF. What am I missing?
I agree, his ideas are alarming. I would call them "another gospel," which the Bible clearly warns against. Paul wrote in Galatians 1:6-8, "I am amazed that you are so quickly turning away from him who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— not that there is another gospel, but there are some who are troubling you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, a curse be on him!"
He is sorta like shorter jordan peterson. Thr video is an mk ultra mind control with bgm btw. Keep that in mind when u watch it.
The birth control thing has essentially already been manifested. People took the shots after all. U think their dna will create children no problem now?
Implanting in 10 year olds is not a privilege given to man. That is something god or satan decides to do here.
Me too!
Before remarking or weighing in on the topic at hand, I will need to study the post in more detail as I am unfamiliar with this brilliant human being you so generously introduced to us. I've been reflecting on your earlier query regarding what visions we have regarding alternative realities for living our best lives, in light of our current state of disillusion. I cannot fathom a way through until a significant number of individuals resolve to learn more about their own self-hood, as in, what makes them "tick", what conscious and unconscious ways of being rule their lives, what motivates and drives them to do what they do, how they perceive, sense, make decisions and by whose authority do they lead their lives. This is a tall order, yes absolutely. What we are dealing with here is the deliberate reduction of human sentience through mass homogenization of education, societal and cultural indoctrination, and focus on establishing a collective order of things. To lead any significant portion of humanity toward a self-reflective consciousness would be a tremendous feat. What say our brilliant minds to this dilemma?
My assessment of the issues and what plagues us aligns with yours.
When I consider why or how it is that the masses have moved increasingly away from self-reflective consciousness, two things come to mind. First, our economic model values efficiency and economy. That is, capitalists try to constantly reduce costs while producing more thereby always increasing profits. The measure of success is largely “profits” not pride in the product/service or a desire to improve on quality.
In similar fashion, as individuals we more and more measure “success” according to how much we can pack into our lives and still get a decent return on the experiences. Think skimming along over the surface of water on a jet ski. We no longer savor a moment in it’s simplicity or embrace boredom as an opportunity for creative thought or reflection. We move through our lives like a car on the production line in a factory….hitting all the stations, cranking all the turns, adding bells and whistles and then racing forward….simply because we can.
Consider all this talk of “innovation and progress”….completely devoid of any discussions or reflections relative to actual value relative to “quality of life.” Instead we are driven to do just because we can and there is some psychotic fear that it we don’t we will be missing out on some grand thing or some important answer to the mystery of life.
And, I can’t help but feel that organized religion is caught up in and intertwined with the paradigm I have described above. That is, man pursues innovation and “progress” in large part because he os seeking perfection.
I am reminded, however, of what an author said to me at a writing conference I attended where we often did free writing exercises on our life experiences. She said, “If life were always easy, we would never grow.”
I suspect in my heart, this is a truth I subscribe to. I believe that it is not simply enough to be free. I believe the human spirit needs or desires fulfillment by self actualizing through work, overcoming challenges, celebrating blessings, connecting with others and nature. It is this duality of our spirit and the physical reality through which our energy and spirit evolves.
And what is the purpose of that evolution? Organized religion thinks largely in terms of salvation. It dictates standards of behavior as the coast of admission. The benefit is to the individual (salvation for good behavior) and to society (social contract of treating your neighbor as you would want to be treated).
What if the purpose of the evolution was not salvation but was to come to the realization that our soul/spirit is part of a greater sea of energy? That we are but the part of a whole. This is a different singularity then the one pursued by the tech WEF guys.
They see the hive as a means to establishing themselves as “God” like. Whereas, I like to think that my recognition that I am part of something much greater leads me to see aspects of life with awe, inspiration, sorrow, compassion, empathy. Always seeking to understand better the fabric of this unity.
But how do we achieve this? It is a surrender of sorts. It is perhaps accepting mortality in the physical world….and dedicating your life to quality of that lifetime rather than spending inordinate amounts of time trying to cheat death.
As I have aged and faced difficulty times, I have found more and more comfort in considering the possibility that the practices of indigenous cultures that honor nature and draw meaning from presentations may have immense value and include truths. Like intuition….simply learning to trust one’s knowing.
I guess it is my way of saying, we need to embrace the magic of life more without making the focus be usurping the magic by insisting we can control life.
“I believe the human spirit needs or desires fulfillment by self actualizing through work, overcoming challenges, celebrating blessings, connecting with others and nature. It is this duality of our spirit and the physical reality through which our energy and spirit evolves.”
Nicely stated. As for organized religion and the exchange of good behavior for salvation I think this is how it is practiced. But this is not true Christianity. The gospel of Christ is salvation through faith
by grace alone. There is no exchange.
There is no evolution. The flesh nature, all that is evil within us, is put to death. We are crucified with Christ. His spirit indwells us. We are in Him and He in us. This is our new eternal identity. The flesh and spirit remain at war until the flesh is shed by physical death.
The most interesting thing and perhaps most misunderstood is that we become more Christ-like not by reforming our flesh nature but rather by seeing our eternal identity and believing that it has been accomplished on our behalf.
We realize that while we contend with the flesh, it is already dead. Because that is it’s destiny. God being outside of time sees our eternal identity. Our need for perfection is thus satisfied.
With this realization we surrender to the Spirit and naturally become more like what we believe we are. It’s a beautiful thing. It is the source of the peace that passes understanding. It gives us joy even during suffering, perfect hope, humility, love and respect for all people.
Thank you. I appreciate the perspective and teachings. I do agree that it is often the “institutions” that distort and corrupt the essence of the practice and teachings of a faith.
While raised Christian, of the Methodist vein, I have come to appreciate that it is not so much the label regarding the religion as it is the effort to understand humanity and reflect on our place in the universe. By that I mean that for me, creed is not so important as the innate desire to connect outside ourselves in a way that promotes both the beauty and struggle that is life finding meaning and purpose in that which cannot and should not be quantified and out up for sale….love and how we treat our fellow man, creatures and all the richness that surrounds us. We can choose to either be part of that immense mystery or we can think that picking it apart, studying it, trying to constantly improve upon and control it is the way.
I know which way brings me peace. I think, however, for people to arrive at a place of faith, wonder and awe they must be vulnerable and see the value that brings when we vanquish the fear of mortality.
Peace to you. Again, thank you.
PS Am curious, are you familiar with the book “Hours of the Universe?”
Would love your thoughts on that. Seriously, I’m not sure what to think…thank you.
Thankyou Laura. You are a deep thinker and good writer. I agree that there is a tendency to dissect things that are not amenable to dissection.
I downloaded a sample of “Hours of the Universe”. The author is brilliant. Her thinking and understanding of humans and the universe is deeply rooted in Darwinian evolutionary theory. She likely has wonderful insights but this coloration is at odds with my worldview which is founded upon an interpretation of the evidence as being resoundingly in support of Adam and Eve being the first literal humans, and evolution being a programmed survival mechanism given by the creator who made distinct “kinds” from the beginning as described in Genesis.
To me every advancement in genetic understanding affirms the wonder and beauty and order and mystery of creation.
I am glad you understand where peace and joy and security come from. I hope to meet in the hereafter.
The book was mentioned to me by somebody who was in love with its message. I respect this person a great deal and decided to read it (not all of it) during these difficult and turbulent times.
I did not get very far into it before I began recognizing the traces of the Davos crowd. And it is not lost on me (I am not Catholic, but my husband is), that many believe that the Pope and the Vatican subscribe to the New World Order being advanced by the WEF/UN/WHO.
To me, the message seemed to be, as you say based in a Darwinian concept. That is, it suggests that the technological advances are moving us towards a more perfect and Christ like consciousness that will unify humanity for the betterment of all. Yuval Harari is quoted in the book as describing this unfolding history as a good thing. Yet, the dark underbelly of this concentrated power and this approach to treating everybody the same or having God’s or the higher power reduced to algorithms then dictated by mortal men, is not talked about.
The only way we ensure against evil or bad unnecessary things is if we have our eyes wide open to the possibility of it rather than sugar coating it for mass consumption.
Perhaps our world or existence is meant to be chaotic in nature. Perhaps it is from the chaos and chance that exists despite our imposing structure still leaves room for mystery and God’s miracles. And why would we want to eliminate that knowing that it is only through both the promise of the garden of Eden and the temptation of the fruit that we learn to love ourselves and others in our imperfect form while striving to do and be better.
The Davos crowd is pushing communitarianism on their terms and with them at the helm.
I prefer acceptance of the mysteries of the universe and the rich and varied tapestries that are woven from the many wild, crazy, unpredictable, and expected moments of a lifetime that contribute to an energy that makes us part of the higher power….whatever and whoever that may be. I don’t desire to have the technocrats program me in the image of what they perceive to be “godlike.” Better that I learn what it means to have God in my heart and by and through me bring meaning to the life force as something amazing in its potential and possibility.
Godspeed.
And by the way, no model but this model provides an answer to the evil tendencies to dominate and self destruct.
Judaism doesn’t think in terms of salvation. It thinks in terms of how to make the world a better place in the here & now. And it believes in the soul as being part of a greater mass, for lack of a better term, of souls & each person contains a spark of holiness (a soul). I’m trying to connect this to your sentence about being part of a whole sea of energy.
Brilliant.
Surely, you are being sarcastic.
There is nothing new under the sun. Klaus and Yuval's vision is Hitler vision 2.0. Hitler wanted a genetically superior master race with a high degree of social connectivity and a distinct and elevated leadership. Klaus and Yuval want the same thing, only chipped. The alternative "rejection of centralized authority" and distribution of decision making is also nothing new. These were the bedrock founding principles for what's left of the United States. You know, all that anti king, limited federal government, state sovereignty, direct voting, created equal kind of stuff. Clearly the latter was the best model. Too bad it is all but gone now. So what all of this heady talk is about is actually the quiet part nobody wants to say out loud. Hint, its what happened when this nation was born...jmo of course.
How about a convention of states...you know like it describes in the actual Constitution? Try peace first? But only after Nuremberg 2.0 for the criminals that are science deniers and censored HQC, and Ivermectin. And pushed Russia-Gate, and embezzlement politics...and CRT....etc
Our constitution is fine. It just needs to be upheld. I'd never trust democrats to revise our constitution. Not in a million years.
A convention of states once seemed like a good idea; but this week's election reminded me that there are millions of greedy non-productive citizens in the USA. Assuming the people of California and New York were not excluded in the process of rewriting the constitution, it could only be MUCH WORSE than what we have now.
But suppose in the Article V convention we become the 3000 united counties and limit the feds to just international affairs. Change the Electoral College to: one county - one vote. A man can dream can't he?
Life would be empty without dreams. I like your ideas. It would also be wonderful if the FBI was abolished and replaced and if there were restrictions on the CIA.
Sadly, with a corrupt Press, a militarized DOJ, and a moron in the White House that simply obeys the orders of the Invisible Government (and, of course, the Biden Crime Family), I am convinced the days are numbered until America is no longer beautiful.
Those were problems that came after the birth of the country...
From an interview of Langan (url below):
"In a reality where the physical world is held accountable to empirical or mathematical science, any scientifically irrelevant theology is implicitly displaced. This makes theological systems untouchable by science and vice versa, depriving science of moral guidance and encouraging the revelatory creation of different metaphysical realities associated with conflicting promises and instructions involving the physical world. (These metaphysical realities include not just overtly religious frameworks, but the random materialism embraced by many scientists and followers of science.) The resulting disagreements cause, or provide pretexts for, real-world conflicts."
Seems that he is describing our current situation. Science has been deprived of moral guidance and we are being propelled by pseudo-religious frameworks, such as climate change or transhumanism, into oblivion. I am not smart enough to see how the Human Singularity he describes will prevail...
url: https://superscholar.org/interviews/christopher-michael-langan/
I agree. I don't see it happening either. Sigh....
It starts by being at least aware of the two possibilities.
The key term is new age. Once u become aware of that then u may see the possibilities. Gene roddenberry was in a channeling session with council of 9
"both capitalism and collectivism, as they are monopolistically practiced on the national and global scales, lead to oligarchy and a loss of individuality for the vast majority of people."
One of my best thoughts is free market capitalism is opposed to the free market economy.
Another is, the professed communists refuse to live in communes.
If religion being necessary to rally the masses, here in the USA it would be Jesus was a rebel against hierarchy. Either (mimic) Jesus or serve the hierarchy through the intended hellish brutal techno mind control.
So look at the last 500-1000 years of humanity and tell me we will be intelligent/courageous enough as a species to distribute as noted. We are a weak species, and if the world is not stupid enough to let the globalists take over, then we will be stupid enough to create AI that will take over. One way or nougat, this idiotic species will cede power to some central authority; we are simply too weak to do anything to our benefit. Again, look at the last 1000 years and convince me differently.
I have become nihilistic and believe we don't deserve to exist as we are too filled with avarice and idiocy.
I am glad I only have a few years left as a member of this moronic species.
May I humbly suggest that the Bible has the answer? Genesis tells about the fall, which doomed all men to be born with a sin nature. I will admit I can't explain why God would let evil enter the world; that's the question that I've never heard the answer to. I rest in the fact the God's ways are higher than mine. If we will repent and believe that Jesus came to pay the penalty for our sin, we can be forgiven and spend eternity with God. You're exactly right, we cannot fix this mess, but I choose to believe that God has given me a mission and a message. Part of that mission is stand against the injustice we are seeing now and take a stand for the vulnerable. Take care.
Satan is in the world so we would know the good from the bad. Opposition in all things.
According to the Bible--evil is not a thing which was created it is an attitude and action of rebellion against God the Creator. Lucifer rebelled and Adam and Eve rebelled even though God told them they would die if they chose to eat of the one and only forbidden tree.
That is how evil and death entered the world. Love does not exist without choice to not love. God gave us the choice to love Him or not. He loved us first. He paid the death penalty Himself--in our place--through the death and resurrection of Jesus. So we can be saved from the penalty for our sin and be reunited with Him forever if we trust in His perfect sacrifice on our behalf--and not trust in our own sin twisted efforts to prove our worthiness.
Proverbs 9:10 says, The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom, And the knowledge of the Holy One is understanding.
He has made Himself known to us through Jesus the Messiah and has written a book man would never write (because he is not displayed in a flattering light and is not the hero of the story). God wrote a consistent picture and account through many writers over thousands of years that has been preserved even though it has been banned and burned more than any other book because it has been seen as a threat by every anti God government in history.
At least take the time to read the whole book and see what God says about who He is and who we are and what is life about. He makes life worth living and will never leave you or forsake you.
For some reason I cannot get the like button to work for me, but I say ‘Amen’.
It seems to have some sort of weird delay. Shows up after a bit that I liked something. But just in case, amen, amen!
While I am no atheist and I find comfort in the Beatitudes, the Bible was written by men over a period of centuries. Some believe that God is more cruel and evil than Satan because they believe that YHWH will torture people for eternity because of misunderstandings and mistakes.
I cannot help but wonder why Jesus, who was a Jewish rabbi for three years, would want a new religion based on himself created.
My favorite version of the story of Jesus is presented in the "Thomas Jefferson Bible".
There are recent revealed text like law of one or a course in miracles to study.
The bible is the inspired word of God, and Jesus the ‘Word of God’ made flesh (man). Jefferson cut out every reference to Jesus because he was a deist, not a Christian. He sought to make a God of his own design.
The Messiah came to set men free from the wages of sin, which is death. He was and is the perfect ‘lamb’ sacrificed ONCE for all who would believe and put their faith and trust in Him. Jesus, the Messiah, claimed that He and the Father were ONE, making himself EQUAL to God. He did not create a ‘new religion’, He fulfilled the Law and all the Prophets… in order to reconcile fallen man to a holy and righteous God.
Fear is the mind killer. The hebrew word they often translate as fear is not fear
Consciousness requires contrast. In the Garden of Eden, innocence but very limited consciousness. An evolved soul returns to the Garden with a fully evolved and awakened consciousness, including the knowledge of good and evil - and transcending that knowledge as the journey through duality has accomplished its goal and he or she now knows the Reality of the Garden for the first time.
Don't you think the young generation is already enslaved (to their digital gadgets)? There is only one small step to total enslavement, and they wouldn't even notice.
That's part of the Big Tech Globaists plan.
Good thing ets exist then and r here
With the upcoming Biden-Fetterman 2024 presidential ticket, commonly known as the “No Brainer”, intellectual articles like this are a breath of fresh air. That said, I’ve always imagined WEF wretches would eventually kill each other off one day, as by their nature. Barring that not happening soon enough perhaps a great revolt by the masses may occur, like in “The Hunger Games”. If Tech Singularity spirals us out of control then it’s by definition out of our control, so yes, send Divine Intervention, please 🙏.
It already arrived
People thought it was russian sonthey canceled it.
Wow!!! I second Dr Minor - I Only Accept God’s Mandates!
I was put off at the very beginning of the video! Bifurcation?? (and I know what that word means!) That demonstrates either a lack of imagination or prescience. I can believe the former but not the latter. I put this guy in the bin labeled with Eisenhower's definition of an intellectual: a [person] who takes more words than necessary to tell more than [they] know. And I don't even find it fun to read.
What looks to me much more probably to be a real bifurcation is The Empire of Lies* (US and vassals, WEF) vs the Global South + Russia, i.e. The Multipolar World.
*Some folk add Chaos and Plunder to the title, but I find that too much of a mouth full though I agree it's appropriate.
Dear Dr. Malone,
Thank you very much for writing this article and bringing Mr. Langan's work to a wider audience. I’d say devoting one’s time and effort to understanding his work is definitely worth it, especially if one's goal is the pursuit of truth – the implications are profound.
From The Power of the Powerless (1978) by Václav Havel:
Above all, any existential revolution should provide hope of a moral reconstitution of society, which means a radical renewal of the relationship of human beings to what I have called the “human order”, which no political order can replace. A new experience of being, a renewed rootedness in the universe, a newly grasped sense of “higher responsibility”, a new-found inner relationship to other people and to the human community – these factors clearly indicate the direction in which we must go.
For me, the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe is that direction.
Kindest regards.
That was a good try, but Langan is operating from some inaccurate presuppositions that, similarly to how physicists lacking a comprehensive Unified Field Theory end up with competing views of how the universe works that cannot be reconciled from their present level of understanding, he is creating an unnecessarily tangled mess of incompatible perspectives. I'm not going to try to dissect it all for the readers right now, but ONE of his fundamental errors is not understanding the relationship between religion and spirituality. He is conflating the two, where the REALITY is that they are so different as to actually have almost nothing to do with each other.
In a nutshell, the non-physical dimensions of Reality are both outside of (or "beyond") three-dimensional time-space and are the SOURCE of the denser, lower-vibrational physical universe that we operate within in our physical bodies, and that non-time-space level is what we can label "spiritual". Religions, on the other hand are just attempts at explaing or describing that non-physical Reality, but it CANNOT be described or explaned WITHIN the context of time-space. It just simply doesnt "fit" here. Therefore ALL attempts to describe it or talk about it in any way are futile and quite meaningless. That is the problem with religions. They have all arisen as attempts to describe that other reality by people who have had some level of direct experience of it, and we, as human beings CAN directly experience that other-dimension because it is the ESSENCE of the non-physical-part of us that is what our consciousness, or awareness, "comes from" and is "made of". Self-awareness/consciousness is not physical. It does not come from the brain. It does not arise out of neurons and neurotransmitters. The brain is just the interface or "translator" between the physical and the non-physical.
This is the tremendously huge mistake that allows monsters like Schwab and Harari to even begin to conceive of human beings as mere mechanistic objects to be controlled, preyed upon, and abused, and transformed into some kind of dehumanized "transhuman" cyborg slave. It is absolute proof that those people are as stupid and ignorant as anyone who ever lived! Ignorant MORONS!!! They can only believe that nonsense because they are completely disconnected from what they are, their essence. Evil is IGNORANCE of Reality, of what is true. Just as darkness has no "existence" of its own, but is only the absence of light. Evil is the absence of connection to Source, to Self. And that is a confusing and painful place to be.
The good thing is that since they understand nothing about Reality, they are absolutely bound to make endless fundamental errors. And they do. That is why those people like Klaus Schwab are constantly doing such stupid things!
Religion is just descriptions of people's experiences of that reality, but again, the spiritual dimension cannot be conceived of or described in physical terms. It doesn't work; it will never work. The two things are vastly more different even than a cookbook and the prepared food on your plate that you can actually eat. Or a map on your cellphone and the road you are driving on. One is but an indication of, a two-dimensional representation of something. Religion is no more than a "shadow" of the Greater Reality. It is NOT Reality. It is NOT Real. That is why there are tens of thousands of different religions, and adherents of every single one believes that their way is THE RIGHT WAY. Does this make sense? Can they all be "right"? Is ONE of them THE Right Way? No. None of them are! None can be. They are made-up attempts at describing the indescribable. EVERY religion IS WRONG!
What IS Real is our connection to that non-physical Source Energy ot vibrational Reality, because that is what we are made of. But no one can "get there" through the limited mental processes of everyday thoughts that operate on the surface of our awareness. Only by quieting the endless chatter of our physically- time-space-oriented mind can we move our pure consciousness back to its Source and have an expansive, transcendent experience. That beyond-physical awareness is connected with by focusing on the silent gap BETWEEN our thoughts. Then it is sort of like being turned inside out, and you discover that what you are is much, much bigger on the INSIDE! And that connection is the source of all the good things that spirituality realized people have spoken of through the ages: Love, Peace, Bliss, Joy, etc. It is really all the same thing there. Just different facets of it.
The only exception I would make to your comments is this re religions vs. spirituality: their original and primary purpose is to unfold a pathway, a map, a guidebook for the internal journey that must be made to access the non-physical dimensions of reality while still in the body. It does have to do with raising and refining the individual's vibratory level/frequency into a more open and universal awareness beyond time-space in preparation for the eventual departure from the much more dense consciousness of bodily existence. However, most religions have become artifacts - institutional structures which are bureaucratic rather than transformational. The devolution from original messenger to message to monument seems inevitable as the Greater Reality, as you call it, is not a transmissible realization.
"re religions vs. spirituality: their original and primary purpose is to unfold a pathway, a map, a guidebook for the internal journey . . . "
Not exactly. Religions are always a leftover artifact of people who had a strong connection to that vibrational frequency. Religions happen later or much later after the real thing, long enough that the experience someone actually had is just heresay and the people hearing about it didn't get the real message that it is something that has to be directly experienced and not just thought about or written about. Yes, people can get inspired when they hear that such a personal experience is possible and learn that it is something precious to be sought. But as you said:
" . . . most religions have become artifacts - institutional structures which are bureaucratic rather than transformational."
They are ALL artifacts. And the main organized religions are, unfortunately, ANTI-spiritual! The are falsely promoting themselves as "THE WAY" to get to heaven or whatever. They prescribe all kinds of studies, rituals, listening to sermons or whatever, praying in special ways, wearing a special garb, going on pilgrimages to "holy places", eating a certain way, etc. NONE of those things get anyone anything spiritual. ALL of them are, or usually are, just time-wasting distractions that KEEP people from the DIRECT experience of a higher vibrational state. Also, when people have that direct connection to Source energy they don’t need any "intercessor" or "intermediary" religious institution, so the organized religion loses "paying members". They don't like that! Priests and pastors like to get supported! Church organizations therefore teach that anything except THEIR WAY is bad, apostacy, heresy, the work of Satan, etc. A few centuries ago people would have been tortured to death or burned at the stake to "save their soul"! Even today, if you are Muslim and turn away from their idea of the "true religion" they will KILL you, according to Shria law!
Your suppositions about Christianity are incorrect.
This is not about the old religions but a new one. The bifurcation wilk make old ones obsolete
Old. New. It's irrelevant. All religions are just codified attempts at explaining something that cannot be explained because it is beyond/outside of this space-time dimension. But we can access it vibrationally/experientially because that is what we (our consciousness) is "made of". Thinking about it just gets us nowhere.
Just like your religion that is trying to explain stuff using words here, right?
A quick dictionary definition of “religion” does not seem to warrant such vilification:
From Oxford Languages: “the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.”
From the Bible: “If anyone thinks himself to be religious, and yet does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this man’s religion is worthless. Pure and undefiled religion in the sight of our God and Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world. James 1:26-27
There is nothing wrong with “religion” per say. It has everything to do with spirituality because it is evidence that we are spiritual beings. It is the outworking of our beliefs.
As recorded in the book of James 2:26 God says, “For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead.”
I think the real problem is that people come up with teachings and traditions that contradict the dictates of God Himself. Jesus often challenged the Pharisees who came up with their own additions that went against what God said. As recorded in Matthew 15:3-9 Jesus said:
“Why do you yourselves transgress the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition?
“For God said, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, he who speaks evil of father or mother is to be put to death.’
“But you say, ‘Whoever says to his father or mother, “Whatever I have that would help you has been given to God,” he is not to honor his father or his mother.’
And by this you invalidated the word of God for the sake of your tradition.
“You hypocrites, rightly did Isaiah prophesy of you:
‘This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me.’ ‘But in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.’”
Right on!
Within the context of Judeo-Christian teachings, a core problem (again, all as a result of ignorance) is that humans have reversed the idea of we being "made in the image of God" and have instead made God IN THE IMAGE OF MAN! So they ascribed all of the human qualities of anger, jealously, desire for revenge or retribution, desire for adulation, etc. to their concept of God. But to be fair, some of the qualities attributed to Jesus are also applied to God: love, compassion, forgiveness, etc. Those are pretty diametrically opposed to the qualities of the "Old Testament" God. But when people are raised in a religion they tend to accept the beliefs "as Gospel" (pun intended!) and seldom question the contradictions. After all, the Church (temple, priest, etc.) Knows Best, right? Because that's what they were told by authority figures.
This seems to be a popular take on the Jude’s-Christian God. But does God not have the right and ability to reveal Himself to mankind the way He chooses?
You are right that we should not hold the teachings of human church “Authorities” as origins of truth and use their teachings as parameters for how we practice our faith. But we should go to the source of truth that God has given all of us access to. When you study the whole Bible from Genesis to Revelation, the God of the Old Testament and God of the New Testament as revealed in Jesus are one and the same.
God "is one and the same" (but always expanding/evolving), but BELIEFS about God are more or less limited to the the finite human intellect.
God didn't write the Bible. It is just one of many attempts to record both cultural mythology (including Origin Myths), and experiences of people having various spiritual experiences, including Near Death Experiences, Shared Death Experiences, spontaneous visions and dreams or visions brought about through the use of psychedelics ("accuracy" being highly questionable), out-of-body experiences (questionable if they occurred as elements of dreams or in a near-asleep state such as those of Robert Monroe's), through hypnosis in our present era (the accuracy of which is also questionable depending on the skills of the hypnotist or hypnotherapist), or through meditation.
The Bible has been both highly edited to magnify the teachings (and manipulations of) of the Catholic Church, and wronly interpreted because those without direct spiritual connection do not understand the parts of the Bible that try to describe it. For instance, the "Name of God" or "Word of God" is the vibrational frequency of God itself. But Christians who don't understand that believe that the BOOK is the "Word". Which proves that they don't understand their own Bible, because it does NOT say "In the beginning was the Bible, and the Bible was with God, and the Bible was God". (from John 1:1) Thats is pure nonsense! But that is the logical result of calling the physical book the "Word"! But since they have no idea what the Word is, that's the best they can come up with.
That is the viewpoint that many people hold in New Spirituality but scholars have differing views as to how to authenticate ancient documents. And people have differing views as to how to authenticate truth.
Becoming familiar with the translation process and with the original languages that texts were written in, as well as studying ancient cultures helps to make things clear. The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls among other archeological findings prove the reliability of the preservation of the Ancient texts.
As much as people enjoy trying to "figure it all out", all that stuff is just "wheel spinning". There is no such thing as "New Spirituality" or any reality to any other mental constructs or imaginations about the non-physical. Our minds that are grounded in this limited, physical reality simply cannot process that which is outside of space-time! It doesn't work. That Greater Reality doesn't "fit" here. We can conceptualize what one dimension is by imagining a single "point" in space, and we can conceptualize two dimensions by imagining something flat like a piece of paper, and of course we can easily relate to normal three-dimensional objects, but just try to extrapolate that process to imagine four dimensions. Good luck! Maybe brilliant mathematicians can represent it mathematically; I guess that is what they do, or try to do, but that level of math makes no sense to me. Our three-D-oriented minds cannot visualize something in four dimensions as an object, and that is probably because anything that we can make a mental image of also belongs to 3-D. No "physical" object can exist in 4-D. This is just an example of the limitations of our mental processing. But we have the same limitation trying to mentally relate to the non-physical that we experience as spirituality. Religions are only crude attempts and cannot "get there".
All they can do is say,: "There is something that is beyond this physical reality, and you can tap into it. It is what you return to after you separate from your physical body, and it is wonderful. You have experienced all that before and you will again. You are a spiritual being just "wearing" a body, and nothing here in the physical dimension can harm what you really are in any way. You are Safe. You are Loved. You are Cherished by the infinite Consciousness that you came from and that no matter what happens here, you will go back to that Source. And you will still be You. There is no place where you can get "lost". There is no "hell" unless you, through your confusion, temporarily sidetrack yourself in such an experience, because we have free will as aspects of the Creator, and are free to make even "bad" choices and we, along with the effect of resonance frequencies that we attract as creators of our reality, shape energy into experience. But it is all learning experiences. And as we learn, we become more discerning about what it is that we really want to experience, what we want to attract to ourselves. We learn that Love is the highest vibrational reality. That loving and caring for our fellow souls on our journeys is the most satisfying. That being in a physical body is a gift and that while we are here we can experiece things that cannot be experienced on the Other Side. We understand that Life has immeasurable value, and that it is the Grand Adventure.
If a religion doesn't remind us of those things, then it has no value. Too many (most?) religions are self-serving control trips that use negative emotions to coerce people into going along with them: fear, guilt, shame. They become formalized, self-perpetuating organizations that cause a great deal of emotional/psychological harm to their adherents.
Master Teachers who remember very clearly what they are and powerfully express the frequency of Source energy can raise the frequency of those around them through resonance. This serves as a reminder to people of Where they came from and how to maintain a higher vibrational state themselves. Many religions are the after-effect of one of these Teachers being here, but the Experience of that energy won't come from any book or sermon. And formal religions that teach all kinds of ideas about heaven and hell, and have all their rules and regulations and things the adherents must memorize and actions they must perform are just distractions and a waste of time. They take people AWAY from the pure experience of Source that can only be connected with internally and without the thought process.
Bottom line, if a religion points people towards connection with their essence, great! But that's all it can do. Just saying "look insude to find it" is the most a religion can do. After that, the person has to go there to find what they are looking for! People like to study the Bible or other religious texts. What they want isn't in there. All that time they spent reading, instead they could have been connected with the vibration of their Source energy and getting "blissed out".
You sound like the politicians that are trying to gaslight me and vilify what I have come to know in my search for truth about the vaccines and the fine Freedom fighters who have helped me in many ways.
I am sure that the mental, spiritual and emotional experiences that you have are real and satisfying to you. But to deny the reality of the spiritual freedom, restoration, joy and love that I experience from walking with God, since I have been reconciled with Him--a personal Creator, who made Himself known and sought me out and saved my life through the death, resurrection and forgiveness of Jesus is rather arrogant.
You said, "People like to study the Bible or other religious texts. What they want isn't in there. All that time they spent reading, instead they could have been connected with the vibration of their Source energy and getting "blissed out"."
There is no such thing as "New Spirituality"? How about New Age or Gnosticism? One of the distinctive features of this religious belief system (loosely defined as it may be) is the abhorrence of labels. I mean no disrespect but the long cloud of narrative you sent me is Gnosticism which has been around for a long time. Another distinctive feature is that it incorporates teachings and practices from any religious system. So you can pick "Christ Consciousness", redefine Jesus as whoever feels comfortable to you, collect a smattering of verses from the Bible or from Hindu writings, from the Kabbalah, from Quantum Physics or from wherever. You can take that route to wherever it leads.
But you have not studied what the whole Bible teaches or learned about how it was preserved--so you can disbelieve it, you can take verses out of context to make them mean what you want them to, but you cannot explain what it means, or say that the God that is revealed in its pages is not real. Please stop gaslighting me.
You are reading my words through your own filter and missing the point. The point is that the ONLY thing that matters is your connection to God, the Infinte, Source, the Creator or however you want to label it. What you experience IS the point of everything a religion SHOULD be inspiring people to do, but instead it takes people away from the pure experience and down endless rabbit holes of beliefs and dogma. Same thing with whatever the Gnostics believed. NO religion is the experience of God. Only the energy itself, and that is what God is= energy. The highest vibrational frequency in the universe. And you CANNOT open the pages of a book and have it come pouring out! It is not in there!
R u aware of how many genius iq people prometheus society found that were wasting their time as u put it? Read their fire article. Outsiders by grady
Agreed! (I also have been having trouble getting the “like” button to work. (?)
Not sure why anyone is interested in klaus or his wef. He has no authority, no army or police eforcers, nothing but money to broadcast their insane message and bribe craven politicians. If we have complaints, they're with those craven politicians. Our politicians. Klaus can't do anything to us, but our politicians can send their police to arrest, beat, or shoot us. We need to focus on real problems. Klaus and his clown show are just distractions.
News today that one country, Netherlands I think, is "considering" ceasing to send an annual 200k taxpayer euros tribute to klaus. It wil be interesting to see if they go through with it, and if others follow. HOW MUCH OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS ARE BEING SENT TO KLAUS CLOWN SHOW?
Flanders
Cool! As in Simpsons or the Poem of Flanders fields the poppies blow...
between the crosses row on row...
As in Flanders the country ceasing paying ransom to the w.e.f.
I do not claim to be a genius like Mr. Langan, but I think I understand enough to know meta-religion is not the answer, particularly if his idea agrees with what I found on this site (see tenets below): http://www.supra-id.org/meta-religion
--Aligns with science and observation. --Asserts a non-thinking (an explicitly insentient) God that is intrinsically purposed by way of a Supra-Intelligent design instantiated into natural reality. --Disavows the reality or necessity of the soul or subtle-body. --Disavows the reality or necessity of Heaven or Hell. --Disavows the reality or necessity of reincarnation. --Explains the fundamental reason that symmetry constraints are central to the architecture of natural reality, which includes metaphysical reality. --Explains the fundamental reason that physical primitives are quantized in terms of a requirement on the architecture of metaphysical reality, which is the quantization of consciousness (i.e., the need for individual instances of consciousness). --Explains why reality is polarized with respect to time (i.e., possesses a direction to its evolution) and why that causes the phenomenon of "Good and Evil". --Explains why the sexual allure is the luminescence of the Godhead State of evolutionary finalized consciousness.
Is this the same meta-religion Langan is referring to?
Interestingly, as I was searching for more info on meta-religion, I found a church in NYC called Meta Church. I was skeptical, but checked out their beliefs and found I agree with them. https://meta.church/about/
The Bible talks about a system, often referred to as Babylon, which sets itself against God and will demand allegiance. I could conceive of mega-religion's teachings as headed toward that. I decided early on that the covid/vaccine agenda is a satanic one. I'm not at all sure we can stop it, but we have to try, of course. I will humbly place myself in God's hands and trust Him to do as He wills, in His timing.
There is a playlist on CTMU metareligion on our channel. Here is the crux of it (5 mins): https://youtu.be/OA1SDjZ00tE
I am deeply grateful for this extraordinary crossing of paths in such a time of Human and Planetary need -- that you should come to 'know' Mr. Langen and lead others to him is truly a reason for Hope.
May we stand up with the Lionhearted and show ourselves worthy of their Gifts.
There are two paths. The domain of Darkness/Death and the Kingdom of God. John 14:6 Jesus said, “I am the Way, the Truth and the Light. No man comes to the Father except through Me.” I’ve been a Christian Missionary since my internship in 1966. I’ve seen multiple people raised from the dead in Jesus’ mighty name. In the USA, Guatemala and Cambodia. No other name works. I’ve cast out demons in Jesus’ name. No other name works. I’ve seen blind eyes recover sight, multiple stage 4 cancers in one man totally disappear whereby the Hindu oncologist chose to follow Jesus. I’ve seen gangrenous dead feet at the point of amputation, totally, instantly healed in Jesus’ name.
Jesus is King of Kings. Lord of Lords. He took the keys of death, hell and the grave from Satan just before He rose from the dead. Alive forevermore.
If someone really wants to go to hell, you have to really work at it. Jesus did His utmost to love and save you forever. Your choice.
Dr. Malone - thank you for covering Chris' important work. He is heavily cancelled and maligned. If you would like to speak with Chris, I can arrange that. Keep up the good fight. God bless you and yours! We have two substack newsletter (since we were both thrown off Patreon) chrislangan.substack.com and megafoundation.substack.com
He’s brilliant and right.
Excellent find, Dr. Malone. This was the man who single-handedly led me to to God.
This is also the man who best understands what is happening right now, as he's been anticipating it for some time (the 2018 paper you cite is just one example).
Of note is that he has his own publication here on Substack (which he started after Patreon shut him down):
https://chrislangan.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=reader2&utm_source=%2Fsearch%2FChris%2520Langan&utm_medium=reader2
The Semantic Scholar link you provided for "A New Kind of Reality Theory" is tough for us laymen to access. A better general link for the PDF is as follows: http://infolab.ho.ua/Langan_CTMU_092902(1).pdf
There's also a good collection of his major papers available on Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/Chris-Langans-Major-Papers-1989/dp/097191625X/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2V52BWVY6F319&keywords=Chris+Langan%27s+major+papers&qid=1668221401&sprefix=chris+langan%27s+major+papers%2Caps%2C137&sr=8-1
As well as an earlier easier-to-read collection of early works titled "The Art of Knowing":
https://www.amazon.com/Art-Knowing-Expositions-Select-Essays/dp/0971916241/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1RMN7R7HFH9PE&keywords=The+Art+of+Knowing&qid=1668221492&sprefix=the+art+of+knowing%2Caps%2C147&sr=8-1
This is a man uniquely worth the time investment it takes to understand.
God bless
Robert, I'm glad you found someone with so much similarity to you. He sounds fascinating!
We must have a human singularity and we all have something within us that resonates with that. Unfortunately so many people have been infantilized by perpetual low expectations and handouts and brainwashing, that I can't see it happening on it's own.
I am of the opinion that there is the beginning of a raising of consciousness happening and it will happen in time to turn us all towards the light. Spirituality is the answer, not religion. We can all connect with the Infinite Source within us, and when we do that, the evil beings chasing us with chips in their nasty, little, grabby hands will be powerless.
So glad you dropped this. The dichotomy before us - the conflicting singularities noted above, is very real and well articulated by Christopher. The dichotomy has been on the minds of so many of us in one form or another for ages - most common as a dichotomy between those who are awakening and those clinging to a hopelessly dying paradigm - with no clear vision ahead in either case. Those awakening keep faith, those who don't go full blue pill reactionary, clutching at the old and crumbling - like the atrocity that is Transhumanism - the desperate last gasp attachment to a materialism that has already begun to evolve in something greater - as Christopher states in so many words.
(as art) I offer the following simplification on duality at the level of Christopher's discussion:
"[In the beginning…………..(there’s a beginning??)]…………..
…from The Void, God infinitely ponders the puzzle of Experience. To explore this question, God begets Creation so that God might perceive God through an infinitude of entities distributed throughout a Universe without end – each one a unique portal through which God as consciousness might experience God as phenomena – thus commissioning the Oneness Duality – variously represented as: Creator/Creation; consciousness/phenomena; emptiness/form; spirit/body; thought/energy; mind/matter; Heaven/Earth; 0/1; implicate order/explicate order; inhale/exhale; red pill/blue pill; hole/doughnut ……etc. Life is our voyage on the razor’s edge [ / ] between – the coin that is phenomenal only so long as it bears both heads and tails."
https://bohobeau.net/2016/07/20/42/
I would love to meet him! What amazing insight! And yes, dense but comprehensible. Thanks for posting this.
Dr Malone thank you for your work and for bringing forward the writings of Christopher Langan. I have instinctively recognized the sustaining value of his theory. I appreciate all of your efforts and those of your medical colleagues who are fighting the good fight.
The first step is to define "medical freedom". If you sue your doctor for negligence, putting forward the argument that there is an "alternative" treatment modality which would have avoided the damage done to yourself or your loved one is a non-starter. No lawyer would take your case. The judge wants only to know if the treatment was "the treatment regarded as standard by the profession". Where does the treatment regarded as standard come from? It comes from the Institute of Medicine, previously a federal body now renamed and taken out of federal. control and run as an NGO called the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). So in other words it's run by the Rockefeller drug company cartel. The president of NAM is a Chinese American named Dr. Victor Dzau. His fingerprints are all over the pseudopandemic. (See Amazing Polly's videos on the "Global Public Health Mafia")
Pharma medicine is garbage. It was founded in 1914 by the Rockefellers. No-one knew what vitamins were in 1914. But the "pill for an ill" paradigm has been set in stone ever since. Show me a pharma medicine protocol and with an hour's research on pubmed I will find an alternative, natural, non pharma solution that is a) much more effective and b) safe and I will document its effectiveness.
So here is my proposed road map out of the mess:
1. All "Public Health" bodies to be abolished. Especially the WHO.
2. Foundations to be outlawed and the tax avoided by their use historically to be repaid.
3. University endowments to be liquidated and the cash raised used for student grants. There is enough money In Ivy Leaf universities to fund student grants for decades. (The endowments are yet another tax avoidance scheme. They are hedge funds where ownership of funds is swapped for control to avoid tax. The money is then invariably invested in the pharma interests of the Rockefellers and cronies under the guise of "medical philanthropy")
4. A new "Flexner Report" to be conducted by biologists with no ties to pharma to establish new protocols that will be taught in reformed medical schools.
5. The Rockefelller masonic lodge the Council on Foreign Relations to be abolished.
www.seignalet-plus.com
www.survivethejab.com
youtube channel: Chris's UHM
Here is the evidence that no-one has to die from a viral infection in an ICU.
https://rumble.com/v18vvow-high-dose-vitamin-c-can-bring-you-back-from-the-dead.html
Here is why you never heard about it:
https://rumble.com/v18vxp4-susan-wojcicki-complicit-or-dupe.html
Rockefellers wannabe illuminati vs rothschilds vatican
Too many words. Sound and fury signifying what?
My reaction? Sounds like the One World Religion of the three Abrahamic world religions being promoted... MINUS the actual Jesus the Messiah. No thanks. Both modern day Islam and Judaism consider Christians as 'polytheists', and therefore idolaters. They do not understand the concept of Trinity and reject it. I am not a Christ-Conscience or God-Conscience seeker, I am a child of our Holy Father... reconciled by the atoning sacrifice of the Word made Flesh, on a Roman cross. His substitutionary death for my sins. He rose again, so shall I.. and all who put their FAITH and HOPE in Him alone.
We need to decentralize if we want the best society possible. https://open.substack.com/pub/joshketry/p/decentralize-everything?utm_source=direct&r=7oa9d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
But how do you bring so many ignorant people up to speed to be critical thinkers AND doers, when they(leftists) think YOU are the Nazi for defending the individual(right)?
We don't. Rather we simply take the people who want to see a better world and make apolitical (non polarizing) missions and accomplish them together with anyone who wants to be part of it. Most people - left or right - should want a system that isn't corrupted to start. We need to do this first. It all starts here, then once we have a place to organize and make action plans we start with transparency and decentralization: https://joshketry.substack.com/p/how-do-we-build-a-network-of-people
He sounds like an interesting guy!
The Reset From Hell is NOT inevitable. To quote C.S. Lewis, “If Christianity is false, it is of no importance; and if true, is of infinite importance. The thing it cannot be is of moderate importance. There are no unimportant people.”
The real inevitability is Schwab’s & Harari’s trajectory to hell unless they wake-up and repent.
I just read an astounding book, Designed From the Core, by astro-physicist, PhD, Dr. Hugh Ross. He walks you through the universe, from the beginning of space, light and time to the exquisitely designed Earth where we are enabled to thrive and know our Creator/Designer. Thé mathematical probability of advanced human life on Earth is statistically so close to impossible, it is an ongoing miracle. There is a just right design. There is a Designer who has made us to know Him. He sent us His Son to reveal Himself. Atheists like Harari and Schwab are abysmally ignorant of real science. The more advanced research in the realms of science, the clearer the Anthropic Principle is shown to be stunningly friendly fingerprints of God’s handiwork on our Earth Home.
Thanks for the book recommendation.
Cancel Culture --- https://substack.com/inbox/post/83954106
After publicly promoting the event, and changing the venue due to "high demand," peace activists withdraw their invitation to Scott Ritter -- 11/11/2022
(Note – the article includes more – it is about Scott’s incredible persecution by “American Justice”)
Scott Ritter has been my hero for a long time -- because of his demonstrated high integrity, courage and patriotism. Until now I was unaware of the suffering and horror inflicted on him by the “American Justice”.
Thanks to Scott and by now famous video we know that the corrupt criminal monster, Joe Biden, knew with 100% certainty that Iraq had no WMD but Biden brazenly denigrated Scott’s testimony calling him “Scotty boy” and led us into Iraq war.
Let’s hope that he stays well and safe although Scott is on Nazi-Ukraine’s Kill list (with full knowledge of Biden and the US War party). Total censorship and oppression are now mandatory in the US so that bipartisan War party can conduct its proxy war against capitalist and democratic Russia and support the Nazi-dominated puppet government of Ukraine.
Let’s stand with Russia -- it fights for all of us. In regard of US proxy war against Russia, as Scott stated: “Russia is on the right side of history.”
"The Human and Tech Singularities relate to each other by a kind of duality; the former is extended and spacelike, representing the even distribution of spiritual and intellectual resources over the whole of mankind..." Given that Human physical survival is dependent on physical resources and those resources are only available to our very unique species through technology beginning with such things as fire-making and even the most primitive of tools, it is impossible to conceive of an "even distribution of spiritual and intellectual resources over the whole of mankind" kind of equity without a corresponding equity in the physical realm. There are insufficient physical resources available for an even distribution for the current 8 billion of our resource devouring species to survive in a manner sufficient to avail themselves of cultivation "of spiritual and intellectual resources." What level of physical existence is conducive to such an ideal? Certainly, a physical existence far more meager than most aspire to.
It took at least 200,000 years for our species' population to reach 1 billion 2 centuries ago, then 2 billion 1 century ago, and now 8 billion. This is due to technology, to which we are now totally dependent, and from which all but the most rapidly evolving species (e.g., viruses) are in existential jeopardy. This all argues for the extraordinary human brain and its resulting culture to be, even more so than the dinosaurs, a complexity too fragile to persist in its current form, and perhaps an evolutionary dead end. Short of massive depopulation (way too sterile a term) it may be that the only way forward is more tech, some kind of AI, that hopefully leaves future humanness somewhat intact. Not my cup of tea and I gladly won't live to experience it. On the other hand, very doubtful my current self would enjoy the culture, as a whole, of even 100 years ago. Adapt or die. Physical reality.
Ets.x men mutation psychics
Very thought provoking. There needs to be a reawakening of the spirit's of western societies to God's scriptures without man's "systemic" theologies overriding what scripture is saying. We need to turn our hearts to God, trust and rely on Him, and walk in faith. "Hate evil, and love good, and establish justice in the gate; it may be that the Lord, the God of hosts, will be gracious to the remnant... (Amos 5:15)" “Yet even now,” declares the LORD, “return to me with all your heart, with fasting, with weeping, and with mourning; and rend your hearts and not your garments.” Return to the LORD your God,
for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love; and he relents over disaster. (Joel 2:12-13).
Kind of feel lucky (like its providential, that the USA was invented with the Constitution) that we are currently alive at this historic moment to use the ideas and inumerated tools the humans 245 years ago thought might work. Now if we could only get 81 million citizens to read the thing and learn what its for, for the individual....even the LGBQT+2a Marxists, that aren t even self aware enough to know they are the prototype drones for the tech singularity path. Sigh.
I'm optimistic because just looking at history we've managed to somehow kill each other less and get to 8 billion of us just trying to raise a family. If only we could just get the bureaucrats out of the way. Liberty means letting Leftists have the firearms that fail, on their own. The country and normal people in all countries just want less government, unless they really do make better drones than managers of ones own life , so success is discovered and achieved working smarter and not harder.
Dr Malone, neither of the two futures you describe is possible precisely because we have now begun the energy descent. I have spent my entire career as an energy and sustainability engineer. We are now past peak oil and there is nothing that can replace fossil fuels. By 2100, human civilzation will have naturally devolved to something like a new feudalism, based on exploitation of local resources. Globalism of any kind, whether it is based on technology or religion will be impossible. I think that is a good thing. Let's focus on building cultures now that are place based and founded on morality and reverance for God and nature's gifts. The sooner we recognize the inevitable, the sooner we can begin to adapt without losing our souls. Do you doubt me on the energy question? Then tell me where you think the energy will come from.
Thorium salt reactors. You get the thorium from coal. You get 13 times more energy from the thorium then you would burning the coal. The tailings can be converted into synthetic gasoline (the Germans developed the process in WWII) using part of the energy from the reactors. He have hundreds of years worth of coal. In a few hundred years, if humans exist on this rock, I'm pretty sure we will have solved the problem by then.
Interesting! If there's a will, there's a way. Just get those working to depopulate the planet out of the picture.
Thorium dkes not make nukesm emhence govs dont use it.
Canada and the US were working on a design, but I don't know what happened to that project.
Likely secret space program put it into classified patents. Read the drive s tyler article on navy ufo patent and fusion generator.
Got a link?
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39012/the-navy-finally-speaks-up-about-its-bizarre-ufo-patent-experiments
What are your thoughts about energy from the sun? And nuclear?
I agree that solar the way it is now isn't sustainable or green. There has to be a way to make it work.
No there does not have to be way to make it work.
What do you have in mind?
What I have in mind is accepting reality. We live on a finite planet. The only sustainable source of energy is our Sun. We are burning through the ancient fossilized biomass created by solar energy - oil and coal. Once that is gone, we will be left with the same sources of energy our ancestors had, mostly biomass and animal power.
Nuclear, photovoltaics, wind, hydropower and all the rest are only possible because we have diesel and coal to mine the minerals and make the steel and other materials to construct these alternative energy devices. When you start looking at EROI - Energy Returned on Energy Invested - you see how limited we are.
I am hopeful that in 100 years from now, we may be able to have the best of the 19th century technology with some enhancements from electricity where it can still be provided through micro-grids running on renewable biomass, with some solar PV and wind. Maybe the thorium reactors will work out, but they won't be widespread. I don't expect the Internet to be around. Radio could be though.
We would be in a lot better shape now if we had listened to those who urged us to conserve and consume less, but thanks to the greedy and the technocrats, we have created a culture of more, more, more. I suppose the tech-singularity people think that we have to have this massive energy blowout to support the technology development they want to achieve their ends. Like Evel Knievel they have poured on the gas to try to jump the Grand Canyon. They will fail and techno society will lie in a heap at the bottom, while the rest of us figure out how to move on.
Personally, I look to indigenous ways and groups like the Amish for guidance. We will need a lot more horses! Dr. Malone, take note!
The good news is that religion will thrive in this environment and humanity will not be oppressed by the technocrats. I appreciate this discussion and the meta-religion idea, not because I think it is right, but because religious discussion and inquiry will help many of us who are disconnected to come back to a more spiritual life.
I'm a fan of Spiral Dynamics, in that I see the progression of humanity as an upward spiral. We don't move upward in a straight line, we dip "backward" to include what works. We can learn from the Amish, indeed. All that said, we're in extremely perilous times and we may need miracles to have healthy progression.
Its been a long day watching the preliminary Covid hearing and pouring into the other sstack. So need to go back over this again.
My preliminary thoughts focus on the need to be able to cover the concepts and process in a way to convey it to the folks one hopes to get to adopt it. The interpreting wont be easy.
This begs the issue of where to establish the founding communities. Also a factor.
Next the process of settling in and putting the vision into action and dealing with the adjustments needed.
The author appears to posit this all needs to be done quickly before the vise crushes us into the WEF(et al) control they envision.
To me the next issue is how we organize to accomplish the mission.
As with the objectives of today’s hearing - worthwhile start - how to get underway.
Thanks so much for providing us perspectives on what needs to happen and the need to get underway with it!
As a technologist, I am disinclined to believe that every problem has a technological solution.
However, I believe the future holds many EXISTENTIAL-level problems that innovation can greatly help to alleviate.
The problem is, in the potential dumbing down of humanity. Innovation takes more than intelligence, it requires wide experience and thoughtfulness, and the willingness to take mental and physical risks.
I see these characters, as does Langen, as the anti-thesis of DAVOS and the W.E.F. view of the world.
Agree. But he also seems to want a plan to get rid of the UN worthies through genetic testing. That’s eugenics. How about we as a society go back to ‘you don’t work, you don’t eat’, and only offer support to those that really need it.
In America, we've seen what a democratic administration has in store and their massive influence by way of the Trusted News Initiative and their censorship policies. We also have a better chance with a republican admin in 2024 so the party better play it smart and put up a candidate that has a chance of winning.
In the meantime, we keep sharing great substacks like Dr. Malone's and others, The Highwire, etc and keep talking to those we know in hopes that our numbers continue to grow fast enough until some critical mass is reached where the Agenda 21/2030/Great Reset people lose their influence. Every day, as vaccine injuries and excess deaths mount and the carnage becomes more visible, more people are open to seeing what is really going on.
Nice job, Dr. Malone. Humanity, realizing we are truly spiritual beings, must take control of our destiny in the face of technological control by the ultra rich. Langan and his CTMU need to be a much bigger part of the conversation. His ongoing cancellation may result in the cancellation of humanity as we know it.
But he supports eugenics. greynlightenment.com
Not exactly. He opposes the globalists agenda to “downgrade” humanity so as to be more easily controlled.
That was one comment taken from 13 hours of video, 22 years ago. He has actually modified his views a bit because the world is run by James Bond villians who cannot be trusted to safeguard the human genome. We must do it ourselves, the need is dire.
Humanity is indeed bifurcating and we are being downbred into a slave race. As Christians, and people of God, we need to stand against that. God gave us free will and we must preserve the integrity of our being. More at: www.ctmuradio.com God bless.
I'm sorry, but as several have already commented, Jesus said, I am the Way and the Truth and the Life, no one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6) People who deny the deity of Christ and deny what He clearly said, are not genuine Christians. Humans are not God. We are created in His image, but are not equal in any way to God.
But the CTMU supports Christ IMO.
This type of metaphysical relativism is allowing us all to be divided and conquered by mutually inconsistent beliefs. We need a sound logical basis for our metaphysical beliefs ASAP.
When you finally arrive at the meeting place with Mr. Langan, Please give him from all of us,
our finest greetings wishes and utmost support. "The bigger the city, the brighter the light. The bigger the dog, yeah the harder the bite." Right about now....we need both!
Nor will I.
"To understand his own identity, man requires a coherent and therefore monic self-model reflecting its psychological coherence and relating it to all levels of reality. That is, man requires a valid interpretation of the human individual in society, and of the individual and society in reality at large. "
I start my mornings by reading Substack essays. This morning's offering, with the wisdom of Mr. Langdon included, was out of my intellectual reach. While I was tested (pre-LSD/marijuana) and convinced I had an IQ of 136, despite the fact that I have been a meditator for 52 years and an avid reader of quantum physics, metaphysical concepts, and religion, the idea that humans from Chicago to Kinshasa might understand and apply the concepts suggested in Dr. Malone's hopeful essay seems fantastic and impossible.
Maybe if 1/4 of the world's population became psychoanalysts and the rest of us became patients, his concept of a future world might be possible.
It is much more likely that Klaus Schwab's view will become our Brave New World.
Most people do not understand that we have a physical body and a psychic body. Not 0.01% of people have any desire to explore their potential or to look beyond the next football game or the next six-pack of beer.
I'm sorry: it just seems like wishful thinking to believe that the billions of proles/serfs/peasants/slaves on planet earth are capable of being more than pawns for the rich and powerful. And when it comes to religion, in America, we have given up faith in a higher power and now worship "science" - which is speedily following the dictates of the WEF and killing us in a wholesale fashion.
We live in a world of ignorant savages who would rather fight about trans-rights than consider the actual threats to existence that are increasing every day.
In my view the collision of singularities this cowboy philosopher posits, have their beginning in Europe with Martin Luther's attempt to equate Selbstlichkeit to the Judaic notion of Original Sin. The inherent failing in this view, is that the Judaic account of G_d has Him existing alone, experiencing pleasure in the goodness of His own creations, and sharing none of those pleasures with anyone, until He bothered to create some living beings with whom to share the joys of living. Luther's construction taken literally makes G_d a sinner, for He was selfish and did not immediately share. Luther papered over this objection by following a Greek tradition of dividing G_d into three Persons, who thus shared with each other.
Alyssa Rosenbaum some five centuries later, writing under her pen name Ayn Rand, openly claimed to be atheist while leaving signs of her respect for Judaism scattered throughout her nonfiction writing. Rand bluntly asserted Selfishness a virtue and not a vice, demonstrating how rational self interest joined with personal choice, had improved every aspect of human life. Yet she too described a subset of behaviors, described in her fiction as a variety of evils, then in her later nonfiction as Subjectivism, whose opposite is her philosophical school, Objectivism.
The danger the Subjectivist poses to his neighbors, is that it only matters to him that he wins the argument and emerges with control over others.
The Objectivist by contrast, truly does not give a flying **** who figures out what the truth is. Most important to the Objectivist is learning what's true, because Reality behaves according to what is true about Reality, and not what we imagine about Reality. Confusing Up with Down before letting go of a climbing rope on a mountain can have lethal consequences.
The Subjectivist is often so driven by vanity that he will put his life and the lives of others at risk, to preserve the self-delusion that he knows best, when in fact he may know nothing. Revisiting Luther's experience of corruption within the Christian clergy in the 15th Century, the evils he actually experienced were a kind of secular Subjectivism in politics ("I'm the King. I want it. Gimme it now or I'll chop your head off and take it") that corrupt Bishops fostered by a second level of Subjectivism ("The King rules by divine right. When two kings dispute something, God grants to the winning king victory in battle and the losing king is shown the limits to his power...but we Bishops can save both kings from a divine curse for the sin of killing people over land or money, by accepting a gift of money or land from each of them, made to the Church"). Rather than explain to kings the difference between right and wrong, corrupt Church leaders cashed in on the profits while peasants lost everything in taxes to fund the constant wars.
The problem with Luther's "selbstlichkeit" is that it completely ignores all the good that is done by learning what's good for ourselves. Just as G_d was alone at the beginning of His creation. just as He alone was first to make and see light and to see that it was good, we as pre-verbal infants are alone in human society. We experience love when we are fed and comforted, but we are not capable of sharing that because we lack the capacity to return these gifts.
Wanting things for ourselves is thus not evil. And there is no necessary conflict with others over what we each want. All the war and other political violence between people over who wants something, arises from the idea of Entitlement, a belief that "our people deserve more than your people".
It is Entitlement that drives Elitists in search of the transhumanist Great Reset of life on Earth. A planet overrun by mindless bots that wait upon the Elite, who spend most of their time in Subjectivist entertainments like the massively-narcissistic Metaverse, never requires an Elitist to ask Please nor say a heartfelt Thank You for the kindness of another human. He lives out his lonely existence behind a virtual reality helmet.
I think where I disagree with this Singularity theory, is that nothing is inevitable about the choice between Objectivism and Subjectivism. Both choices are constantly present. Neither outcome is permanent. And falsehood always falls way to truth, because truth remains true whether we believe it or not, but falsehood morphs constantly under the force of reality.
I'm glad to see Chris is leaning into this problem. It's obvious that the tech singularity is winning the race so far. Based on the truck load of weapons grade propaganda that we all had dumped on us, and how so very few of us saw it for what it was, I'm not very optimistic in humanities outcome. I tried to awaken people to the vaccine dangers and found most family and friends militant in their refusal to even consider the narrative was wrong. Heck most got angry to the point that the false narratives became off limits. Fast forward to today, we've seen deaths, heart failure, blood clots, still births, zombie skin tone, other heart damage, unusual menstrual bleeding just in my kind of small circle of family and friends. Only one of those injured people recognize that it was the vaccine that caused their injury and submitted a VAERS report. The rest will get aggressively angry if you even mention anything against the narrative of safe and effective.
Chris holds himself out as the smartest man in the world. He may very well be. I consider myself intelligent, but didn't take enough psychology in college to even know if it's possible to wake people up. I'd like to see Chris or someone else put forth a actionable plan on how we fight this to win. I'm willing to contribute financially to their effort until CBDC prevents us from even opposing the tech singularity. To be honest it seems the public gets sold out by both political sides. We make tiny swim strokes against a tsunami and likely only have a year or two at most to meaningfully resist what's almost here.
Hi, Greg. Chris really doesn't "hold himself out" as the smartest person in the world. I merely quote others on our YT channel (Chris is not on the channel). Psychometrics is my field and I have yet to meet someone that can hold a candle to Chris in terms of intellectual firepower. Just for the record.
I am responding to let you know that the current book Chris is working on is a complete explication of the problem (the poarasitic divergence) with solutions. He presented on the topic a few months ago but YT struck down the member-only video last month. I'll be posting it at our substacks shortly.
Oh I agree Chris is brilliant. Personally I have no idea if it's even possible to stop the train wreck humanity is heading towards. I hope so, but I don't see the odds being very high. On the one hand many who are asleep to the danger took the mRNA Vax and are culling themselves from the gene pool, so that will help. On the other hand the bad guys virtually control the information flow, so getting information out against the tech singularity is going to be hard. Keep everyone posted as to what Chris comes up with. I pray it will be a game changer. Any solution to this mess is out of my league. But I'm willing to pitch in financially once I see a viable plan. Best of luck.
This is why god sent thosenlike me and starseeds
The 'operative' word (in) Mr. Langen's theory, "The cognitive -Theoretic - Model of a Universe" - is of course the word "cognitive", which would or WILL be the (perhaps) insurmountable fly in Mr. Langen's ointment - so to speak. Cognitive dissonance of "reality" has always been a problem for the great mass of humanity - who perpetually look for someone - physical or metaphysical to - "lead" them and provide for them - all of their needs - throughout their lives.
The notion of (individual) 'self-responsibility' - is NOT a factor in the equation of 'modern' life on earth.
Teaching self responsibility - (should) be one of MOST important aspects of life that (a) PARENT can TEACH their children in order for them to grow into positive minded human beings that are not a drain on society as a whole. The youth of today - presumably those who would be the receptors of Mr. Langen's new humanity - are largely seen as a pack of wild savages -short term oriented mobs - with no observable traits other than instant self gratification by plundering other peoples property - with NO morals, remorse or sense of wrongdoing...including murder and rape. This appears to be a global
phenomenon in virtually all "societies" and races.
In short, an argument can be made that until PARENTS EDUCATE their children in BASIC notions such as "being responsible for oneself" - that the future of humanity may indeed entropy into the exact opposite of the Darwinian vision of the future of the Homo-sapien species; which also may succumb to what John Von Neumann alluded to of runaway technology that will consume mankind from nuclear to biological catastrophes - including destruction of the global electrical energy grids.
On the POSITIVE side, one can only hope that humans en toto, WILL awaken before the lights go out.
Without Chist, "Much Ado About Nothing."
CHRIST
The beauty of the gospel is that you don't have to be a genius. Simple people can grasp it and more intelligent people can find great depth. Whichever category we are in, we are granted salvation in exactly the same way, by admitting we are sinners who are separated from a holy God, repenting of that sin, and asking Jesus to forgive us. We are totally dependent on His grace. We cannot earn this salvation by putting forth new and interesting theories or by doing good works. It's all about Jesus.
“an uncontrollable technological quickening, a sudden acceleration of complexity followed by the transformation (or extinction) of humanity.”
I knew it was bad. I think it’s too late. We are beyond the knee of the curve, we are all being played.
Sometimes you and the probably interesting people you talk to/about are way over this dummy's head! Can't make head ner tales of this one!
Interesting thinker, although I did find him somewhat difficult to understand. I especially like the jaw analogy, which I think is insightful. But I think the most important thing for humanity right now is that people discover the recordings and writings of Alan Watts, who I think explained the universe with both a clarity and depth which may far exceed what anyone else has done to date. Watts may not have been smarter or more spiritually enlightened than yourself, Dr. Malone, or Mr. Langan, but I think it was somehow given to him to be the vehicle of an incredible teaching which will, imo, transform human civilization - if it survives - over the coming decades and centuries. Of course everyone has to decide for themselves and choose the path which feels right for them, but if anyone here isn't aware of Watts you may want to check him out. I prefer the recordings (lots on YouTube, but they are generally misnamed and may have parts edited out), he was such a wonderful speaker, but his written masterpiece may be "The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are" (1966) which addresses not only spiritual, philosophical and psychological issues but, importantly, political activism as well.
And in the realm of politics, as I've commented here before, I think one of the most important issues is the voting system issue, which I'm working on at MEVoting.com. I took down what I previously had up because some of it was confusing and/or wrong and am starting to rewrite it, with a relatively short synopsis of the whole issue now there. Seeking feedback and/or help with the project.
I am aware of watts and steiner.
https://healthresearchfunding.org/christopher-langans-theory-explained/
Do you believe that humans are created by the Divine? If so, how does the Divine fit into the picture? Is there a Divine plan for humanity in which the Creator is actively involved? If the answer to these types of questions is in the affirmative, then what is the role of humankind and how do we engage the power of the Divine for executing the Divine plan.
Many people have described what we see happening in our world today as evil. Is it evil in the sense that it is bad, or is it evil is the sense of supernatural? What drives people like Klaus Schwab? Is he bad, deranged, or is there something more deeply evil about him?
I am afraid that my IQ is far enough away from 150 that this essay makes my head hurt. I am smart enough to see that I do not want to be a simple economic asset for the likes of Gates and Schwab. We have to fight back in every way that we can. We must have people like Robert and Jill Malone who can help us match the enemy on an intellectual plane.
All of us, including the intellectuals, must answer the above questions and determine how to use genuine spiritual resources to defeat this drive to turn humans into cattle, and elites into gods. If this is the plan for mankind it is a sick plan. I simply do not believe this is the destiny of the human race, to become mere economic asset for those playing god.
We are the children of the Creator, created in His very image and loved by the Creator. That is our destiny! We must stand up and claim our destiny.
Hi Dr. Malone, your link to "The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe: A New Kind of Reality Theory" doesn't work. I suggest you use this one: http://infolab.ho.ua/Langan_CTMU_092902(1).pdf
PS
Minor quibble: It's Langan, not Langen!
Warm regards,
Mike
This is on the back cover of a book of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's essays "Activation of Energy - Enlightening Reflections on Spiritual Energy" (I'm convinced he's one of the brightest of human minds, prescient even): "Following in the footsteps of his earlier works, this collection of essays by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin brings greater clarity to the stunning potential of human energy if it is properly channeled, as he describes, "upward and outward." While energy wrongly directed appears as depression, drug addiction and violence, Teilhard promises that spiritual energy channeled correctly will become a true force in the universe, far outdistancing the potential of technological advance." That's hardly enough to know what to do, its a paragraph in the back of a book. It is, like his writings, certainly encouraging.nd promising. He writings alone, though not easily comprehensible, will bring one out of a depressed and stagnant state (staring at the TV, drugs, alcohol, social media and food addictions) and back into the current of evolution, ongoing development of complexity of one's own self spiritually, intellectually, creatively and biologically.
BROKEN HYPERLINK
The link to Christopher Langen's paper is broken--apparently by Facebook. Here is a link to a webpage offering all Christopher Langen's published essays:
http://hology.org/ctmu-papers/
I'm currently reading Christopher Langen's essay on *Metareligion as the Human Singularity*, and I can relate to some of the posts already given how what Christopher Langen says about 'God' conflicts with popular ideas about God's identity. e.g. the God of the Bible. The last reference to 'God' (p. 329/ 9) says this:
"Similarly, standard theology - a metalanguage for the analysis and comparison of religions and religious conceptions of God - is dualistic as well, standing apart from the religious languages which form its content (and for that matter, from God). This implicit dualism renders standard religious and theological languages fundamentally incapable of expressing the spiritual unity of man and nature. To eliminate the dualistic separation of languages and their universes, dualism must be formally eliminated from the intrinsic structure of language."
In my non-trivial experience as a 'true believer' (leaning toward a-theism) within Christianity across cultures I have been forced to reckon with precisely this "dualistic separation" in religion AND science. (HINT: this is a natural consequence of moving directly from an -ology to a -god without a mediating -osophy.) In the first couple pages of the essay I hear an echo of the writer of Hebrews (some propose St. Paul others Barnabas etc.) who invites everyone i.e. Jew and Greek to follow Jesus outside the 'gate' of their religio-political arrangement and 'within the veil' of just such a comprehensive reality e.g. a theosophy of supratemporal totality:
https://jgfriesen.wordpress.com/glossary/totality/
The Flammarion Engraving has become my icon of iconoclasm:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Flammarion_Woodcut#/media/File:Universum.jpg
Urbi et Orbi
Finally, I offer this: "Advaita means 'not-two.' And 'not-two' is not the same as 'merely one.' Thus, nondualism is not a monism, although Westerners often interpret it this way, because they have no other categories of thought."
https://jgfriesen.wordpress.com/glossary/advaita/
We obviously have different notions of what faith is. For me faith requires acceptance of things unproven and in the case of religion unprovable. For the vast majority of the faithful of any religion, study is not required to experience what in Christianity is called the Holy Spirit. In the story, Christ converted multitudes by his mere presence (sometimes, but not necessarily, accompanied by beautifully poetic language). No study required and inquiry frowned upon. cf. Doubting Thomas. I'm sure you know chapter and verse.
As valid method of inquiry, science "merely" requires logic. Faith does not. If your method of arriving at a state of faith requires "inquiry and study" your version of faith is condemning billions of the faithful to eternal damnation. What church in Christ would need to require this of the truly faithful? Such study is desired, but never required, perhaps excepting the higher ranks of the priesthood.
Interesting to consider the “Christ-Consciousness” of individualism in opposition to the “Tech Singularity” of global, monopolistic power. Christ-consciousness wholly embraces the duality of Good versus Evil—a clear and demonstrable description of the history of the human condition. To portray Christianity merely as an opiate for the weak and gullible or a ruse for self-righteous, self-serving personalities defies logic. In fact, highly educated and imminently rational minds conclude that seductively demonic evil is at war with an active, ultimately benevolent, and just God. We’re free to choose what we believe, but only the Christ-conscious binary proves worthy of faith.
The need or new future-visions is now overwhelming, and growing numbers of people are speaking about it. Some deep principles are required however, if that is to go anywhere.
I believe such deep principles, whose time has now come, exist. A hint in their direction can be found here:
https://michaelwarden.substack.com/p/the-witch-the-war-and-the-virus-part
I will be elaborating extensively on that first hint in forthcoming posts.
No problem. Take care as well. You should definitely stick with Christ. I do as well, and, for me, this complements that faith.
Wow, just wow! I will definitely take the time to learn more about Christopher Langen and his thoughts.
We really do not need to invent a whole new vocabulary to speak about the future, because the final book of the Bible, the Apocalypse of John, has given us the words and mental imagery to do this. It is a prophecy that focuses on the final period of world history, and I suggest it can offer us, right now, a vision of great hope and comfort - an alternative to the dystopia that is taking shape before our eyes. John foresees a centralized global government reigning for a short period ('the reign of the beast' for 42 months; Rev chs 13, 17-18) before being suddenly, totally, and eternally replaced by the Christ-conscious, 'meta-religious' humanity (Rev chs. 21-22). In traditional terms the 'singular transformation' point is called the 'final judgment' (Rev 20, 11-15), when all that is evil is condemned, discarded and burnt-up. The vision of the 'new heaven and new earth' in the last 2 chapters is well worth recalling when hardships overwhelm us and we are wondering why we are fighting - through peaceful resistance. That is what awaits us, when the spiritual battle has been won, and God will be living among his peoples, here on this planet. For anyone who wants to go into the details: https://www.academia.edu/44968082/THE_BOOK_OF_REVELATION_A_COMMENTARY_IN_THE_LIGHT_OF_THE_TEMPLE .
Variation is a natural part of creation, It represents the difference between the ideal and the actual situation. The ideal represents a standard of perfection. The quality profession through the Taguchi Loss Function, has identified that the closer a product/service gets to the ideal (target), the higher the quality and the lower the cost (tangible and intangible) to the individual and society.
In quality, the “customer” defines the ideal. In a biblical worldview, God has described “perfect” as all needs being met (Garden of Eden for example) and identifies a moral standard. In considering the two possible futures, who defines “perfect”? By what standard? What feedback will people need to assess progress towards the ideal? And, by what method?
Your article arrived on a day I was feeling absolutely demoralised and hopeless about our ability to possibly stop the evil in progress - our enslavement being carried out both stealthily and flagrantly. Then how to craft a new, successful way of living on the planet? We can't imagine it so we go along with what we are told. How will this change? It felt so good to read a clear offering of what is going on and a solution that is difficult to dismiss
Thanks Mr. Robert Malone for your continued communications and sharing your findings. I believe that the solution, of all problems in general, and the avoidance of the approaching demise is in the understanding of how it (reality) works. How reality functions and learning our role in it. For this purpose, the topic and the line of thought is spot on.
The material (for me) does convey a correct feeling and tends to me more descriptive with home made terms rather than explanatory.
Quote 1
“On the other hand, we can go in another direction, which is to distribute responsibility and decision making power over everybody.”
This is descriptive. Reality is already a blockchain application (if you will) where every form of life has ownership over it.
Quote 2
“In short, man and reality must share a common metaphysical identity.”
Again is descriptive. Reality is already so (metaphysical), I would say that the application the unconscious as per Carl Jung and the quantum physics prove this
Quote 3
“Where metaphysics is a language expressing the relationship between mental and physical reality, spirituality can be understood as the metaphysical essence of human identity, and religion as its organizational manifestation.”
This is when it starts to veer off the path (of my understanding for reality) and what follows becomes very confusing.
There is no merging with tech as an advancement that attempted convergence is just a mass die-off.
I have thought about the same topic, and I am comfortable with the answers I found. To distill it into few words goes like this:
1- Life in any expression is a communication with another realm. (God if you will) (evolution is the most supporting proof for this) (and AI is just another illustration)
2- Male expression of life is primary an unconscious receiver from the other realm
3- Female expression of life is primary an unconscious sender to the other reality
4- Reality is comprised of some sort of successful send receives
We are in an escape room and with the right plan we can get out.
To get to the topic of proposing a solution mine will be each human achieving a personal awareness of their role and then voluntarily fulfilling their role in a structured type of society.
It is late, long after you seem to be present in the comment section. I was wondering what you think of Daniel Schmachtenberger's vision of the future: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_b4qKv1Ctv8&list=PLq9jO8fmlPee9ezOraOHAJ3g9Zh3V2F2G&index=3
Thank you for introducing Chris Langan, Dr. Malone. I'll definitely read his essays. In his approach, Langan reminds me of Konstantin Dugin and his Fourth Political Theory (for those who haven't read Dugin yet, please don't buy into the official narrative; his ideas are definitely worth serious consideration). Humanity's only remaining hope is the rejection of Hegelian dialectical materialism in which the current liberalism (and, ultimately, transhumanism) is as deeply rooted as marxism and fascism were before it.
Ah yes. Good point: the Hegel Cycle and the tyranny of Marx's dialectical engine i.e. Kantian reasoning by antinomies. I find it fascinating to learn about Franz von Baader's Christian cross-cultural influence on philosophical thought. G.F. Hegel said this about Baader:
"Scholarship has at its disposal the rich content which centuries and millennia of learning activity have delivered up to it. This content is not simply left over as a historical remain which only others have possessed, and which is past for us, something with which to stuff our memories or on which to test the acuteness of our critical literary faculties; it is not as though this content did not serve the interests of knowledge for our minds and the cause of truth. The most elevated and profound, and inward things have been brought to light in religions, philosophies, and works of art, in forms more or less pure, more or less clear or clouded, at times in a very shocking guise. We must consider it a matter of special merit that Herr Franz v. Bader [sic] continues not simply to recall such forms to memory, but with his profoundly speculative mind expressly to restore their content to scholarly respectability by exposing and establishing the philosophical idea they contain."
--Hegels Samtliche Werke as quoted in Franz von Baader's Philosophy of Love by Ramon J. Betanzos p. 30
At this point paralytic mind control is winning...
I really appreciate the discussion I’ve been reading.
In 1981 Sting of the band The Police recorded a song that, I think, succinctly summarizes the point of this article Dr. Malone has shared with us.
Spirits in the Material World
Lyrics
[Verse 1]
“There is no political solution
To our troubled evolution
Have no faith in constitution
There is no bloody revolution
[Chorus]
We are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
We are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
[Verse 2]
Our so-called leaders speak
With words they try to jail you
They subjugate the meek
But it's the rhetoric of failure
[Chorus]
We are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
We are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
[Verse 3]
Where does the answer lie?
Living from day to day
If it's something we can't buy
There must be another way”
And there is another way.
On the same album “Ghost in the Machng” Sting recoded another song “Invisible Sun”.
I don't want to spend the rest of my life
Looking at the barrel of an ArmaLite
I don't want to spend the rest of my days
Keeping out of trouble like the soldiers say
I don't want to spend my time in hell
Looking at the walls of a prison cell
I don't ever want to play the part
Of a statistic on a government chart
There has to be an invisible sun
It gives its heat to everyone
There has to be an invisible sun
That gives us hope when the whole day's done
“While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen [are] temporal; but the things which are not seen [are] eternal.”
2 Corinthians 4:18
The Invisible God, was made visible through his Visible Son, Jesus the Christ.
14 in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation:
16 for by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones, or dominions, or rulers, or authorities—all things have been created through Him and for Him.
17 He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.
Colossians Chapter 1
In 1 Corinthians chapter 13, The Bible states:
11 When I was a child, I used to speak like a child, think like a child, reason like a child; when I became a man, I did away with childish things.
12 For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I will know fully, just as I also have been fully known.
13 But now faith, hope, and love remain, these three; but the fngreatest of these is love.
God is Love, and loves you.
To Overcome the World, put your Faith and Hope in Jesus - loving God and others.
If you don’t know if He’s real, just ask Him…He will let you know.
COP27 will present us with our One World Religion and its own 10 Commandments. As we speak they are climbing Mt. Sinai. The elites have both directions covered.
Doc, he’s right that things are moving so quickly we will soon reach a point of singularity. It seems the “techies” have it sewed up. This man (Langer) isn’t able ( or perhaps inclined ) to communicate his alternate vision clearly enough to make a difference at this point in time.
If this article represents what you feel is needed now, you and some of your friends will have to take responsibility for rapidly communicating the contents of it to ALOT of people. In the form he presents, it won’t fly.
I did not understand a good deal of this, nor of some of the discussion. I will say that when I read Desmet, his idea of spirituality being a key struck a chord with me and has stayed with me.
I will add a few disorganized thoughts, though, just to clarify my own understanding. I consider that some statements of Jesus indicate a singularity. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit being one, for example. I'll question that the statement "no one cometh to the Father but through me" is narcissistic. Why? Because it is about being centered spirit, not form (that would be the tech singularity). Spirit can incarnate in form if one is centered in spirit (I'll say the spirit of divine love, in Christianity, the Christ spirit).
One tricky part here is that it is easy to be misled. For instance, the mass formation we are seeing feels good to people because humans are social beings/animals. Oxytocin, for example, is a part of this. The bonding of mother and child is part of the Christian tradition. But oxytocin can go awry and I'd observe it likely has a role in mass formation. Cults routinely use love bombing to create mass formation on a smaller scale (is it mass, then?).
I think that the spirit of divine love is something to consider further, since it includes justice as well as forgiveness. It is not primarily a feeling. Anyone who has been "crazy in love" and gotten over the intense feelings to find a shambles knows this. Carl Jung had some ideas that may be congruent here as well. Religion may or may not be healthy and certainly it has its share of charlatans. Proceeding with caution is advised.
The unhealthy aspects of the tech singularity are easy to detect at all levels. And there is a certain coordination that appears uniform as we see easily with the lockstep handling of the pandemic, but also with the unhealth of those thousands who are being laid off by big tech companies, the cities in California, etc. The jobs at those companies may have been the equivalent of fast food. Some might think of a tech singularity as associated with the antichrist.
I'll watch some of the recommended videos to learn more but think the idea of a spiritual singularity with individually diverse manifestations is appealing. Because "spiritual matters are spiritually discerned" this may be misconstrued as Jesus' actions were misconstrued as political ("render unto Caesar").
Thanks, Robert for this hopeful line of thought. I'll try to understand more through watching the videos.
Well done, Robert; and yes, Chris Langan is correct; we need the new and empowering narrative that provides a doable alternative to the Tech Singularity, which Chris calls the Human Singularity. This Human Singularity is something we can all build, and it requires us right now to give to the billions of animals we mercilessly dominate and exploit, what we would like: freedom and sovereignty. It will only be when we liberate the animals of this Earth that we will be awake, aware, and worthy of the Human Singularity. This is the way that is beckoning - the positive future. It is based on the essence of the world religious traditions: The Golden Rule and the principle of sowing and reaping. We can never sow seeds of oppression of other living beings whose interests are to them as significant as ours are to us, and expect to reap a world of harmony, health, freedom, and justice. As we sow, we reap. We are failing the test in our massive mistreatment of animals for food and other products, and until we face this huge elephant in the room and liberate them, we are lost in delusion. As we turn sovereign expressions of life into livestock, we will ourselves inevitably become livestock. And the beauty of it is, we cal all change right now, and encourage others to join us in the greatest and most benevolent revolution that is now possible and necessary.
We need to be extremely wary where we jump in attempting to avoid the impending 'great reset'. Phrases like "evolutionary terminus and divine spiritual unification event through which mankind, and reality itself, will achieve “Christ-Consciousness", bring up images of the frying pan and the fire.
This is a simulation that we currently live in, a subset of reality. Our purpose for being here in this simulation is to make a decision, for or against, God. God, in His infinite wisdom, endowed us with free will. Jesus offers us the path to reconciliation with the creator of the universe.
I believe that it is very important we do not intentionally misinterpret that gift.
He offered to make us God's, not gods.
I have been compelled to consider the notion that, put simply, would see the somatic immune system as my physical protection from physical harm. And my spiritual health in similar but analogous fashion to be my safety from lies big and small. My B.S. protector, my antenna on the world, my filter over eye and ear which, when tuned and fed and strengthened, provides me with the best possible life in which i can go forth in the world both trusting and discerning. Living in love, including tough love: that aspect of love that sets reasonable limits on behaviour of self and others, sees God-given value in all people, compassion that rests in the strength of knowing. Choosing freely from all viewpoints evil and good. Expecting reward and punishment in proportion to actions: justice in fair measure. Measuring our society with the appropriate yardstick, not of simply materialistic success but true success. A life of meaning.
It may seem subjective, and it is. But i remind myself that our measure of success, or what is good and is not, what is moral or repugnant, was not present at birth. Rather a gift freely given by those who knew the Truth. And we who share in that truth have others to thank for opening our eyes to it.
Frank Jacob has been talking about alternative timelines for quite a while.
Here's the link to his 3-part webinar, "A Tale of Two Timelines:"
https://www.cyberhive.tv/tale-of-two-timelines
He also has a lot of material on Youtube.
My brain seriously needs an update to take in and process "everything."
"As far as I am concerned, this essay gets the closest to the emergent sense of an alternative future consistent with what many in the medical freedom movement have been groping towards of any that I have ever read." That is by far one of the most uniquely profound paragraphs I have read on your pages on this Substack. I had to walk away last night and reread the shape of things to come.
If you were Atlas...and even you now shrug, we must re-arm our thinking behaviors collectively.
There is no such thing as a theory of everything: it is a contradiction in terms. A theory must extract from the whole of reality : it cannot explain the whole of reality. A mathematical proof of god? Mathematics is also an "extract from" reality, not the thing in itself: first reality, then math and a billion other constructs. Langman, Langan, whatever, is evidence that we truly don't know of what we speak by "intelligence": his high IQ is a dead end and cover for absurdity, because few understand it. Birds, among other animals, can do things we can't possibly do: does that make them more intelligent than humans? Religion as we have known it is superstition, and a nasty sort that kills, condemns, classifies human beings according to functions, and has supported every evil government known. It does not support communism or even socialism out of fear of its own redundancy. Langman's Langan's, whatever - this guy's insights are a little late in coming, even had they any merit whatever. They can't undo the fatal trajectory we have put ourselves on. No cultist insight - and that is what he is - will even mitigate the result. These beliefs are a panacea and haven for the guilty who cannot face their own guilt for the destructive role they played in this debacle.
I'm still digesting this, but my immediate reaction is a Christ and Devil singularities. Or Good vs Evil, with a particular Good and a particular Evil. See the first several articles under my substack, starting with https://aletheiatheyounger.substack.com/p/the-worldview-of-the-oligarchy. I'm concerned that too many times notoriety is achieved by changing and/or inventing a language that repeats ages-old truths. It's better to stick with the old language and explain it. Perhaps people are uncomfortable with admitting that Judeo-Christianity has had it right all along, but that is their bias. I do think that using the "energy/space" model is an excellent way to communicate to those inclined to consider themselves technically astute, but don't you think Jesus was saying this: “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.” Matthew 7:13-14. So, we have an extant few billion people that are at least nominal Christians. Start with them, and work out. I recall a substack article that said 30% are standing in the way of the WEF gobalist transhuman future. Around 20-30% are in the Oligarchy camp, and the rest are already vassals. You know the figures, but the key is to activate the 30%, which are primarily Christians but include some Jews and Moslems too. That, I submit, is the responsibility of Christian leaders around the world, including the Pope! Is that a lost case? I say, work at the local priest level.
When I respond to some iof these I keep finding myself nearly 'preaching' and don't mean to as this is not a religious substack... but what he said is why I keep ending up there: "... content of the awakening must be defined and distributed to the members of humanity, thus immunizing them against parasitic mind control. Because this content must be spiritual, the involvement of religion is unavoidable."
It really is unavoidable. Everything happening is so clearly explained in a book put together from scrolls that were written over 2,000 years ago (even up to over 8,000~ ago) and all the human explanations and psychobabble still lead right back to "it is written...". I suppose what I call the psychobabble is necessary for the nonbeliever. But I keep finding my own self thinking we already knew this or that - and it's easier to understand the Bible. 😊
In those " glimpses" the " I " was not there. Because it came back, that "me" energy ( the feeling of a separate " me"), it seems something " happened" at a point in the "past". That's
just a story. THIS is freedom. everything is real AND unreal, nothing being everything, infinitely creative & there is ONLY THIS, in which everything arises ( which is described as bad and good & everything in between, in duality). This IS the singularity. The big bang. 1/ 0 , at the same time, but in the natural reality it is seen there IS no time, only THIS. bum on seat. moving of hand. its never enough for the " me" which has to know or own things to confirm its existence.death of the me energy is terrifying. but there's nothing to hold on to. that energy can simply fall away, even before the death of the body, in fact there are many people walking around where the "me" has simply fallen away. Then it is seen that nothing ever happened.
They don't often speak of it because there are no words. There is no death. Everything arises but for noone. This message is unwantable to a me. There is only oneness, men have created religions around this.
The singularities are well known to me and the timing is very good. This is the dichotomy between the negative harvest and the positive harvest. Which is essentially distilled as utopia vs dystopia, heaven vs hell, freedom vs slavery.
Let me take a more practical example in people s recent lives. In 2020 people had a choice to rely on centralized totalitarian medical care or they could have listened to decentralized unlicensed healers like me.
Now consider the risks and benefits while comparing the end results.
Healers like me recommended hcq and iver along with a host of alternative modalities and methods. The big pharma death doctors took an opposing line. So you see... this singularity stuff is already here in your life.
“The Human Singularity must prevail.”
I believe there are 2 alternatives. Another 1776, or the “Second Coming”.
I believe it will be the Second Coming of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
To your question Dr. Malone, "Is the dark WEF globalist transhuman future dystopia inevitable?" In a word No.
Inevitable means certain to happen. So in that sense the answer to your question has to be no because weather we like it or not, it is happening.
There have been many political systems throughout history, most were hierarchical constructs. All eventually collapse. The most successful that come to my mind are the Mayan, Egyptian, and Roman empires. I'm sure some of our smarter substacker's here can come up with more and possibly better examples than mine but you get the drift. These three I chose lasted thousands of years and were quite successful. We need to remember that we, the United States of America and indeed the modern world governments in comparison to those that I pointed to, are infants.
So in my view, political systems come and go. Sometimes they're replaced with less authoritarian models and sometimes total dictatorships.
The fact of the matter is that the "dark WEF globalist transhuman future dystopia" is here. It's not inevitable. It is happening right before our eyes.
I know I will fight to maintain my personal freedom and the freedom of others to self determination.
Perhaps the question is how long will this system be allowed to last?
The last example of total dictatorship (Nazi Germany) resulted in total war. If I were to draw an infance from that example, I might say that the longitudinal prospects for the "dark WEF globalist transhuman future dystopia" are good. And it will cost much in blood and treasure yet again.
When will we learn?
There are more than just two options. The Bible lays out the one I choose.
LaMaisonGelat
20 min ago
Here is some more amazing sh1tf@ckery from the UK that I unearthed a couple of days ago... https://darntons.com/2022/06/18/second-nhs-official-joins-palantir-leading-to-speculation-over-the-1b-nhs-contract/
So, Palantir has been given the NHS data contract...
"Palantir is already working with the NHS as it was awarded a £23m three-year contract by NHS England to provide the Covid-19 Data Store, and the platform was one of the tools used to help manage the distribution of the Covid-19 vaccine.
Palantir’s Foundry software has so far been used in the management of ventilators and PPE equipment, delivery of the nationwide vaccination programme and helping plan how to tackle the backlog of 6 million patients waiting for elective care."
Of course...
That Palantir has employed the grandson of Oswald Mosley (British Union of Fascists) to run their business in London is... Remarkable...?!
God was and is the greatest scientist . The greatest experimental government works. The constitution came from God. God wants us to live free from tyranny. It is the natural man that is causing all this mixed up mess. The natural man is an enemy to God. Now the spiritual man walks with God. The USA was populated by people who wanted freedom of religion. The right to worship as they see fit. That was and still is one of life’s greatest fights. In the end when Jesus comes to save his people it will be the Earth’s greatest moment. This belief is what keeps me wanting to fight for right. To follow in the Savior’s footsteps and in times of terrible grief and pain to be held in his arms. Love thy neighbor and be kind to those around you. Kindness begins with me.
"The natural man is an enemy to God." I find that ridiculous. Consider Maslow's heirarchy of need. We must be selfish in order to exist. Once our basic needs are met, we rise up to the next level until we reach the top.
Thomas Jefferson stressed the basic needs of the natural man and our constitution demands that we be allowed the rights and powers allotted to us by God. The natural man is heralded as the ultimate in humanity by our founding fathers and by YHWH.
The natural man meaning the vices, the addictions, the greed, disposition to do evil.
Fascinating interpretation of reality. Kind of struck me the same as “skin bags on a dirt ball” did.
Appreciate the metaphysical aspects in his perception of reality. If we can begin to accept the limited aspects of our existence our brains provide us with, we will evolve beyond technology and the technocrats. The reality where our minds/consciousness’ exist beyond our brains’ sensory input can only be glimpsed or conceptualized, fleetingly, through the scriptures. Ascension in consciousness can only be achieved, I believe, through death and the teachings and life of Jesus Christ a human example, not AI.
Fools like Schwab keep pumping their I’ll begotten fortunes into AI in hopes they will appear clever or smart. Sad, empty souls with nothing to offer humanity other than having enough money to publish their twisted version reality they envision they can somehow impose upon us.
In fact the mass awakening has been progressing some time now, gaining momentum. It is this gain in momentum that is forcing the elites hand and driving their haste.
We have solid scientific evidence of paranormal activity (see "The Institute for Noetic Sciences" for a basic resource here.and the capacity to reproduce it. Im not sure that he is talking about the God of the Bible, and believe instead that all major cultures have the capacity to view the question in their own ways. Regardless of that- all these cultures follow the "Golden Rule" - ie "Do Unto Others as You Would have Done To You"
Ultimately the success of a culture based on that kind of thinking will only harm the economic goals of the "Elite" and so they are panicking.
The identity and attributes of a God are another matter and are not easily defined.
i couldn't have said it better myself...LOL
the sticky wicket in my more than less 5th dimensional mind is the thought that if a mind which can only grasp the implications of this spiritual, and perhaps indeed altreality creating bifurcation moment of choice, can only do so through a 'religious' filter, might easily lead to a Pullmanesque version of the innersanctumoneous same ol same ol. or did i miss something?
He is brilliant in analysis. I feel like we all tear the details apart and create such analysis in our own way on our own journey to Truth. I feel as if I may have crossed these paths in years of walking with Jesus and study of His Word. Even in a new and improved 'system', some humans will eventually fail, sin, and create the same problem over time, it is inevitable. Thus, we have the history, the musings, the error upon error upon human err, the basic instructions before leaving earth (bible LOL), the prophecy, the revelation, and most wonderfully fantastic and life changingly stunning of all, we have God the Father Who loves us through it all, even the awful and sickening error in ourselves, and guides us into all Truth when we are willing to follow. He is the Way, Truth, and Life. The Light of the World. He will end it as He stated, and make all things new for eternity. He has placed eternity in the hearts of humans.
A song about the Globalist’s plan for world domination. Listen to Turfseer’s THE GREAT RESET on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/turfseer/the-great-reset
Turfseer’s entire "Scamdemic Collection" can be found here on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/turfseer/sets/scamdemic-collection
Watch 1984 IS HERE on Youtube. The famous novel becomes a metaphor for the current dilemma we find ourselves in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRivqggeAbI
Watch all Turfseer's music videos at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szPvXq8UXGU&list=PLvrDA-UtzN9zSEsaUJ5mvG-zfekakATKJ
Subscribe to Turfseer’s Newsletter. Songs, Music videos and more. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-virus-is-my-god
I am now positive that some people think too much about wrong concepts. Without God inside one’s soul to repel the evil thoughts
All good and well for a mass spiritual awakening but we got to this technological singularity on our own accord. As a species we’ve bought into convenience of tech enhanced medicine, food, security, information, and economy. We’ve allowed this convenience to abed a collective addiction and the technocrat singularity is the natural consequence for that collective addiction. I fear that unless we can break free of this addiction we will indeed own nothing and be “happy”.
On the bright side, perhaps the pole shift catastrophist are correct and the planet will get a tech killing X class flare in the very near future. That being the case our “awakening” won’t be as spiritual as it will be the natural consequence of our techless retreat into a preindustrial reality. Fingers crossed, not crossed, 🤞🙏✌️
(continued from previous comment....)
As for the dilemma we face as a species - there's just ONE problem....resolve this one problem, and all our other problems fall like a house of cards!! Each of the myriad resolution proposals put forth these days is arguably fruitless without addressing this single root issue. History bears this out.
The problem itself is no revelation, nor an original idea. The diagnosis is readily accessible and easy to agree with. Yet, the very notion that this problem can be directly addressed, let alone resolved, lies beyond what most of us believe is possible. Herein lies our greatest challenge.
The following vision for resolution encourages us to expand the scope of our thoughts beyond the recycling of now common rhetoric and hollow platitudes, amidst cliched themes, articulated by the usual suspects, and always constrained by the limits of our ancient (and now rapidly expiring) consensus reality:
https://bohobeau.net/2021/01/29/woke-world/
I'd love to hear your thoughts, brother - at your leisure
Some people think too much and get lost like that.
I wondered how long it was going to take for you to get to your real objection to Langan's ideas. Now, maybe, you will stop pretending it's about word choices. Hasbara trolling isn't as easy to obscure as adopting an Irish sounding name.
You know exactly what it means, "Jim," as your over-the-top, feigned indignation at his association with a "mild racist group" clearly shows. Get back to me when you describe any non-white group in similar terms.
Is the ADL "mildly racist"? Would you be "pointing and shrieking" if Dr. Malone "promoted" someone who supports the ADL? We both know the answer.
lol Yes, absolutely. The last thing "we" should do is show any "hint of white grievance," because that strategy has worked so well up to now. /s
Another Hasbara troll employing the tried and true "Hello, fellow white man" grift.
Langan supports responsible reproduction. He calls it "antidysgenics". The goal is to improve the human race through responsible reproduction by raising the ethical awareness of the populace (the "human singularity").
That video is is a product of mk ultrqw editing
The edits in the vid
Just read this. Amazing prescience. Thank you for the link!!