US Warfighter and Force Readiness: Toxin Exposure and Jab Mandates

Did the COVID vax mandates trigger PACT Act TERA Clauses?

Guest editorial, Dr. Crisanna Shackelford

---

Dr. Crisanna L. Shackelford (Shack): Advocating for Medical Freedom in the Battle for Choice.

With over 32 years of combined Active Duty Navy and Department of Defense (DOD) Federal Service, Dr. Crisanna L. Shackelford (Shack) has dedicated her career to national security, intelligence, warfare, strategic planning, and public policy. Following her 'coerced' retirement from DOD due to her staunch ethical and scientific opposition to its COVID policies, and armed with a deep understanding of the inner workings of the DOD, both regarding defense biologics policies and their impact on the workforce, Shack's expertise seamlessly transitions from wargaming and nonlinear warfare to recognizing critical links between health crises and national security. With a keen understanding of global integrated threats and their interdependencies among state, non-state, and supranational actors, she passionately advocates for medical freedom. Shack comprehends the profound implications for both individual rights and global stability. Connect with Shack at @DrC_Shackelford on X where you can find her work on Redefining Defense Readiness and at @RealReactionsNP on X for her advocacy for the vaccine injured.

Shack is an occasional writer and some of her work can be found on 

---

In addition to overall governmental transparency and accountability, one of the most pressing current unmet COVIDcrisis needs is for compensation and treatment of those damaged by the genetic “vaccine” products.  The official government denialism concerning those so damaged continues in the present, and is supported by an ongoing propaganda and censorship campaign despite abundant documentation (including thousands of peer-reviewed publications) of these harms.  Among other sources, these harms are chronicled in the award winning Epoch times documentary “The Unseen Crisis”.  The programmatic failure of the dysfunctional “vaccine courts” for civilians has been well documented, but what about the warfighter and other military service-affiliated personnel who have been damaged by the mandated COVID “vaccine” products?

Following the @SenRonJohnson remarks at the International Crisis Summit ICS-5 with @RWMaloneMD @BrookeMillerMD @DrHarveyRisch and an esteemed lineup of global contributors, the discourse delved into the profound toxicity of the "vaccines" and its dire implications for our national security and defense readiness posture. The revelation that the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) mandated a toxic exposure through the 'vaccine' mandates for our entire Armed Forces raises alarming concerns. While the SECDEF may not be fully aware of the ramifications, his actions, along with those of the Biden Administration, inadvertently triggered the PACT Act (see also here for Wiki summary) and TERA memorandum legislation. The passage of the PACT Act in 2022 underscores the critical nexus between toxic exposure, national security, warfare capabilities, and defense readiness posture. The mandate for COVID-19 injections represents a forced toxic exposure with catastrophic implications for our national security and defense readiness posture.

The VA TERA SOP states:  

“Vaccines and medications in general are not considered participation in a Toxic Exposure Risk Activity (TERA) because there is no scientific or medical evidence that supports the conclusion that vaccines and medications administered to Service Members have resulted in long-term adverse health effects."  Obtained from VA Whistleblower - VA SOP

With this communication, the VA's internal Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) reveal a concerning disregard for vaccine-related toxicity. According to the VA SOP, vaccines and medications are not considered to meet criteria for participation in a Toxic Exposure Risk Activity (TERA), due to a purported lack of scientific evidence supporting long-term adverse health effects resulting from their administration to Service Members.

This official VA position reveals a stark disparity between reported experiences of service members and the extensive documentation of adverse effects in both the scientific literature and internal US HHS communications obtained via FOIA, raising profound concerns regarding the transparency and accountability of VA policies surrounding vaccine-related injuries.

The specific ramifications of this policy extend far beyond individual service members, and pose a significant threat to our nation's security and defense readiness posture. By evading accountability for the forced exposure of our military to toxic injections, this policy undermines the foundational goals of the PACT Act, undermines warfighter morale, undermines recruitment and therefore force readiness objectives and jeopardizes our ability to defend against external threats.

Just as censorship distorts information and compromises decision-making in democracies, the suppression of evidence regarding the harmful effects of these injections compromises our military's ability to accurately assess its readiness and effectiveness.

As highlighted by Dr. Robert Malone, the manufacturing of engineered toxic proteins in the bodies of warfighters and other service members in response to these mandates echoes the practices observed in military-industrial research laboratories overseen by entities including globally-aligned and funded organizations (for example, ECO Health Alliance), further emphasizing the gravity of the situation.

As stated by Dr. Robert Malone:

"We've caused people to manufacture an engineered toxic protein in their body that we took directly from the military industrial research laboratory activities that were being performed under the oversight of the CCP and the People's Liberation Army." -  @RWMaloneMD

Dr. Robert Malone's statement underscores the gravity of the situation, as our Armed Forces were compelled to accept injections which would cause production of engineered toxic proteins throughout their bodies, tissues and cells. This stark evidence demands government recognition under the PACT Act.

The discrepancy between VA policies and the known health implications of modified-mRNA technology is deeply concerning, given the well documented multiple pathways of toxicity and long-term implications to those who have accepted these products. The impact extends beyond US borders to coalition partners whose armed forces also succumbed to the injection mandate, amplifying the urgency of addressing these systemic failures.

DNA Contamination and other Toxins

Given the toxic pathways activated by the spike protein, LNPs, frameshifted uncharacterized protein translation products and DNA fragment contamination/adulteration [see for example work of Dr. Kevin McKernan et al], there is a strong scientific and ethical basis to consider COVID-19 mRNA injections as a toxic exposure risk activity [TERA]. 

---

---

Title 38 USC 1151 [Benefits for persons disabled by treatment or vocational rehabilitation]

Title 38 USC 1151 outlines eligibility criteria for compensation related to VA healthcare-related disabilities. The gravity of the situation is underscored by Section 1168 of Title 38, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, which mandates medical evaluations for veterans claiming disabilities resulting from service-related toxic exposures. However, despite this legal mandate, veterans continue to face significant hurdles in accessing the necessary evaluations and support, exacerbating the severity of their conditions, and denying them the care and compensation they urgently need.

Section 1168 of Title 38, U.S. Code

Section 1168 of Title 38, U.S. Code, mandates medical evaluations for veterans claiming disabilities resulting from service-related toxic exposures. It emphasizes the importance of thorough medical assessments to determine the extent of disabilities attributable to toxic exposures during military service. See Section 1168 .

Whistleblower Advocacy and Demands for Transparency

Early Warnings and Suspicions

To mitigate future security threats, it is imperative that the US Government and the US Department of Defense address the failures in transparency and accountability highlighted by whistleblowers within the VA as well as a wide range of advocates outside the organization. Concerns raised about the COVID-19 residual scheme, compounded by suspicions of intentional concealment of vaccine-related injuries, underscore systemic issues that compromise our readiness and national security. As whistleblowers continue to advocate for transparency and accountability, urgent action is needed to ensure the health and well-being of service members and veterans. Prioritizing transparency in reporting and addressing adverse events is crucial to safeguarding against future threats to our military readiness and national security.

Dr. Crisanna Shackelford (@DrC_Shackelford on X) tweeted the data from a FOIA request of the Veterans Healthcare Administrations (VHA) database known as Legacy, reporting that tens of thousands of veterans were hospitalized within six months following the COVID vaccine. See for example Shackelford on X .  Moving forward, fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and evidence-based decision-making will be paramount in restoring trust and confidence in the military healthcare system. By amplifying the voices of affected individuals, advocating for policy reform, and demanding transparency in vaccine administration, we can work towards a system that prioritizes the safety and welfare of those who have served our nation. [see image below]

Challenging the VA's Stance

To challenge the VA's flawed stance, it's imperative to highlight the discrepancies in their approach to COVID-19 vaccinations. As stated throughout this article --  VA's denial of long-term adverse effects disregards the significant differences between traditional vaccines and modified-mRNA technology. This oversight not only ignores the known harms associated with the COVID-19 genetic vaccines but also undermines the need for comprehensive medical evaluations and benefits for affected service members. The whistleblower's demand for transparency underscores the urgency of reevaluating policies that fail to recognize the toxic nature of modified-mRNA vaccines and the associated risks to military personnel. Recognizing the implications of mRNA injections as a toxic exposure risk activity is essential to safeguarding the health and well-being of service members and veterans. 1168 and TERA

In February, 2023, a whistleblower within the VA submitted yet another demand for transparency – see Conclusion 6.  In part – the conclusion states – “…Given the toxic pathways activated by the spike protein, LNPs, and DNA contamination, there is a strong scientific and ethical basis to consider COVID-19 mRNA injections as a toxic exposure risk activity [TERA]”

Warfare | Non-Governmental Censorship Forces | NATSEC IMPLICATIONS

The potential ramifications on warfare readiness are profound, and cannot be overstated. As we navigate an evolving landscape of conflict, characterized by intricate strategies and tactics, it's imperative to recognize the vulnerabilities created by misinformation and compromised defense readiness. The complicity of the Department of Defense (DOD) in perpetuating misinformation regarding vaccine-related injuries further exacerbates our susceptibility to external threats.

This presents a stark reality: our adversaries, well-versed in exploiting weaknesses and wielding information as a weapon, could capitalize on our compromised military personnel and readiness posture. In this scenario, our ability to defend against unforeseen warfare tactics and strategies becomes severely compromised, potentially leading to devastating consequences for national security. As we confront these challenges, it's essential to prioritize strategies that bolster defense readiness and counteract the influence of misinformation, ensuring our military remains prepared to navigate the complexities of modern warfare.

In this evolving warfare environment, characterized by various facets and interdependencies, recent observations by Bret Weinstein shed critical light on its dynamics.

 Weinstein's remarks prompt essential inquiries into the nature of contemporary global power struggles.

Bret comments about the…

 “…insanity of throwing highly trained people, in many case, out of the US military for refusing to take the so-called vaccines…my sense at the time was that that likely had the purpose of getting rid of the kinds of people who refuse immoral orders…and it created a much more compliant force..."

Weinstein's observations prompt essential inquiries into the nature of contemporary global power struggles. His remarks regarding the expulsion of highly trained personnel for vaccine refusal underscore the profound implications for the military's operational ethos. Weinstein's perspective, grounded in his expertise as a biologist, delves into the intricacies of nonlinear warfare, a concept increasingly relevant in today's geopolitical climate. This nonlinear warfare, in part, is executed by para-governmental censorship forces, shaping the information landscape, and influencing strategic decision-making. As discussions continue about the Department of Defense's complicity in mandating potentially harmful substances, Weinstein's insights compel us to delve deeper into the nature of contemporary global power struggles and their implications for national security.

Adding to the list of governmental organizations that are complicit, NATO STRATCOM COE's "Inoculation Theory" publication on psychology resilience highlights strategies to prevent the spread of misleading information, particularly by anti-vax groups. The document discusses building psychological resilience against misinformation through psychological “vaccines” or “inoculation”, a concept akin to developing psychological antibodies against false narratives. This strategic approach mirrors the tactics employed by para-governmental censorship forces, illustrating the multifaceted nature of contemporary information warfare and its implications for national security. As we confront these challenges, it's essential to recognize the interconnectedness of information dissemination, non-linear warfare tactics, and defense readiness, as they collectively shape the security landscape of the future.

 https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/inoculation-theory-and-misinformation/217

Summarizing, the VA has a fraudulent SOP that restricts acknowledging C19 toxic injections as qualifying for Toxic Exposure Risk Activity (TERA), despite legal frameworks intended to facilitate such recognition. How much more evidence will be needed to demonstrate the toxicity of these jabs and service-connected jab-injuries? Here are the VA's own words rationalizing this position, which directly contradict current science and evidence:

"Vaccines and medications in general are not considered participation in a Toxic Exposure Risk Activity (TERA) because there is no scientific or medical evidence that supports the conclusion that vaccines and medications administered to Service Members have resulted in long-term adverse health effects...."

In an era of increasingly unregulated Biodefense – biowarfare activities – the development of more modified-mRNA platform countermeasures, concerns are also raised as to what DOD will do to its troops to counter any government or non-government biowarfare attacks.  In an article from NPR – “Made to order DNA…” still more concerns are raised

“Today, we are synthesizing more than 10,000 genes every month," he says, showing off a lab at a Boston biotech company called Ginkgo Bioworks. Making genes from scratch used to be laborious and time-consuming, but not anymore. That's why federal officials are now considering new measures to prevent this rapidly advancing technology from being misused to create dangerous viruses or bioweapons."

Conclusion and a glimpse into our Nation’s National Security – a Dystopian Future

Envision a not-so-distant future where our Armed Forces become entangled in the intricate web of non-governmental censorship forces, knowingly or unwittingly contributing to their agenda. This unsettling scenario prompts any objective person to question the mandate of the COVID-19 jab and the associated toxin exposure. Was the Department of Defense (DOD) complicit in mandating this exposure to toxicity? What are the far-reaching implications for defense readiness, force posture, and ultimately, national security?

These inquiries underscore the pressing need for transparency, accountability, and evidence-based decision-making within our military and governmental institutions. The dangers posed by misinformation, censorship, and complicity in toxic mandates cannot be downplayed. They echo ancient stratagems employed by adversaries, drawing parallels to the tactics of Sun Tzu, who emphasized the importance of knowing oneself and one's enemy in order to secure victory.

As we navigate this intricate landscape of modern conflict, it is paramount to confront these challenges head-on. By prioritizing the safety and well-being of our service members, advocating for policy reform, and demanding transparency in decision-making processes, we can fortify our defenses against external threats and ensure the resilience and prosperity of our nation for generations to come.

REF:

18 U.S.C. § 178 - U.S. Code: (2) the term “toxin” means the toxic material or product of plants, animals, microorganisms (including, but not limited to, bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiae or protozoa), or infectious substances, or a recombinant or synthesized molecule, whatever their origin and method of production, and includes— (A)any poisonous substance or biological product that may be engineered as a result of biotechnology produced by a living organism; or (3)the term “delivery system” means— (A)any apparatus, equipment, device, or means of delivery specifically designed to deliver or disseminate a biological agent, toxin, or vector; or (B)any vector; (4)the term “vector” means a living organism, or molecule, including a recombinant or synthesized molecule, capable of carrying a biological agent or toxin to a host.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/178

Notes at end:

NOTE: It's imperative to emphasize that while commonly referred to as "vaccines," these injections, originally classified by manufacturers like Moderna and Pfizer as gene therapy, are, in essence, experimental gene therapies. Any us of the term "vaccine" is used here cautiously, reflecting the terminology commonly employed in public discourse, but it's crucial to recognize the accurate classification of these products as gene therapy. This distinction is essential to prevent proponents from advancing their version of public health under the guise of traditional vaccination.

---