Drs Malone - with the real, ongoing war against the Farm and small farmer, how can we trust any of these studies? Who is doing real science these days and who is just manipulating the public?
Drs Malone - with the real, ongoing war against the Farm and small farmer, how can we trust any of these studies? Who is doing real science these days and who is just manipulating the public?
He has been out there for a long time. Personally, I think he is paid to market what he markets. We all know that truth does not exist because it is in the mind of the beholder, always has been . There is a God; no there is not. All people are inherently good, just get off track; all people are sinful and must repent for redemption. Isolating the cause of autism is problematic because it does not affect every child within a family. Not genetic, not food, not environment, not whatever....
Shelley, I have been reading and listening to Zach for years. It's like the video I saw of George Webb attacking Dr. Malone.(Twitter) Dr. Bush is as honest and forthright as any I have researched. His history is similar to Dr. Malone, just a different focus. He was the first Dr. I heard of to recommend C, zinc, natural immunity, no masks, no statins, etc.
D D I am sure this doc believes in his studies and those of others that тАЬproveтАЭ in his mind that this substance does whatever he thinks its does. I cannot and would not dispute that. If that is his science and you make it your science, I am totally fine with that. Enough money is being thrown at glyphosate that the FDA will bend its knee and take it off the market just to be replaced by a worse herbicide. By now, we both know that individuals are hardly free to choose, cause gov mandates whatever the highest bidder wants.тАж and we accept their choices for us.
Thanks for your thoughtful response, Shelley. Yes the problem of "truth" is hard to define. Glyphosate evolved out of excess chemicals left over from the "agent orange" of Vietnam. It's like a race for existence, who will win, the unconscious money mongers or the conscious caring of our future.
Just having the opportunity to settle for the greater benefit/risk ratio would satisfy me. I donтАЩt taint anyoneтАЩs food or property with my use of glyphosate. But your point; if farmers use it, itтАЩs not until their harvest is sold to someone else that the innocent could be subjected to what might be a cancer-causing agent in large enough quantities. Food makers are not about to tell farmers to quit using something that would affect the abundance or price of the product they require. Fluoride is waste product and I believe manufactured vitamin E is also a waste product from making paint and the hyped scare of mercury in fish has the vitamin market now synthesizing the lanolin in sheepтАЩs wool to make their D3 products. And, oh sure, letтАЩs get a 3rd party lab to find if the D3 level in that little pill is really 5,000 units of absorbable D3. ItтАЩs all a gamble D D.
Drs Malone - with the real, ongoing war against the Farm and small farmer, how can we trust any of these studies? Who is doing real science these days and who is just manipulating the public?
Read Zach Bush M.D. He is passionate about getting the word out about glyphosate use.
He has been out there for a long time. Personally, I think he is paid to market what he markets. We all know that truth does not exist because it is in the mind of the beholder, always has been . There is a God; no there is not. All people are inherently good, just get off track; all people are sinful and must repent for redemption. Isolating the cause of autism is problematic because it does not affect every child within a family. Not genetic, not food, not environment, not whatever....
Shelley, I have been reading and listening to Zach for years. It's like the video I saw of George Webb attacking Dr. Malone.(Twitter) Dr. Bush is as honest and forthright as any I have researched. His history is similar to Dr. Malone, just a different focus. He was the first Dr. I heard of to recommend C, zinc, natural immunity, no masks, no statins, etc.
D D I am sure this doc believes in his studies and those of others that тАЬproveтАЭ in his mind that this substance does whatever he thinks its does. I cannot and would not dispute that. If that is his science and you make it your science, I am totally fine with that. Enough money is being thrown at glyphosate that the FDA will bend its knee and take it off the market just to be replaced by a worse herbicide. By now, we both know that individuals are hardly free to choose, cause gov mandates whatever the highest bidder wants.тАж and we accept their choices for us.
Thanks for your thoughtful response, Shelley. Yes the problem of "truth" is hard to define. Glyphosate evolved out of excess chemicals left over from the "agent orange" of Vietnam. It's like a race for existence, who will win, the unconscious money mongers or the conscious caring of our future.
Just having the opportunity to settle for the greater benefit/risk ratio would satisfy me. I donтАЩt taint anyoneтАЩs food or property with my use of glyphosate. But your point; if farmers use it, itтАЩs not until their harvest is sold to someone else that the innocent could be subjected to what might be a cancer-causing agent in large enough quantities. Food makers are not about to tell farmers to quit using something that would affect the abundance or price of the product they require. Fluoride is waste product and I believe manufactured vitamin E is also a waste product from making paint and the hyped scare of mercury in fish has the vitamin market now synthesizing the lanolin in sheepтАЩs wool to make their D3 products. And, oh sure, letтАЩs get a 3rd party lab to find if the D3 level in that little pill is really 5,000 units of absorbable D3. ItтАЩs all a gamble D D.