Your question assumes this is about proving a "negative". That is a pejorative and judgemental statement. Proof is proof. Personal affirmations are personal affirmations. Evidence isn't negative or positive...it simply IS.
What I would consider "proof" on this ONE issue would be a neutral organization like Project Veritas investigatin…
Your question assumes this is about proving a "negative". That is a pejorative and judgemental statement. Proof is proof. Personal affirmations are personal affirmations. Evidence isn't negative or positive...it simply IS.
What I would consider "proof" on this ONE issue would be a neutral organization like Project Veritas investigating and documenting her attendance or not. Absent that, there is no proof or evidence. You can choose to believe her, not believer her or continue to watch what she does and what actions she takes.
Simply put, we do not OWE anyone belief and I refuse to jump with both feet into anyone's camp. Even if "proof" is supplied I am not happy with her stance on medical freedom. Vaccine passports are part of a larger control attempt. If you can't work or serve in the armed services without risking death or injury from a shot....vaccine passports are the least of your worries.
I'm not sure I understand the "pejorative" claim but I apologize if I came across as judgmental; I'm not approaching this as a moral issue so that was unintended. But yes, I'm inclined to give Tulsi the benefit of the doubt, mostly because it seems unrealistic to expect proof to be found of her innocence vis á vis WEF membership; someone would have to get access to their records and that seems pretty unlikely. I agree with you that we don't "owe" anyone belief, and that you're entitled to withhold your support for whatever reason you deem valid. I also agree that vx passports are fundamentally tyrannical and I'd like to see her be far more vocal on medical freedom. So my overall sense is that she is a person of integrity AND not someone whose political values align with mine enough that I'd feel comfortable voting for her if the opportunity arose (I don't live in Hawaii). It would depend a lot on the circumstances and the available candidates. But on the WEF thing, I'm not persuaded she's one of them. Seems far more likely they have been dishonest in their claim.
Just an FYI to file.. I got wary of Tulsi Way back when covid was starting. She said she agreed with vaccine mandates. My ears immediately picked up. I am sure the original quote is long gone from the web. She has never to my knowledge touched the subject again. I don't expect you to accept this as proof of anything...simply keep your ears open!
Your question assumes this is about proving a "negative". That is a pejorative and judgemental statement. Proof is proof. Personal affirmations are personal affirmations. Evidence isn't negative or positive...it simply IS.
What I would consider "proof" on this ONE issue would be a neutral organization like Project Veritas investigating and documenting her attendance or not. Absent that, there is no proof or evidence. You can choose to believe her, not believer her or continue to watch what she does and what actions she takes.
Simply put, we do not OWE anyone belief and I refuse to jump with both feet into anyone's camp. Even if "proof" is supplied I am not happy with her stance on medical freedom. Vaccine passports are part of a larger control attempt. If you can't work or serve in the armed services without risking death or injury from a shot....vaccine passports are the least of your worries.
I'm not sure I understand the "pejorative" claim but I apologize if I came across as judgmental; I'm not approaching this as a moral issue so that was unintended. But yes, I'm inclined to give Tulsi the benefit of the doubt, mostly because it seems unrealistic to expect proof to be found of her innocence vis á vis WEF membership; someone would have to get access to their records and that seems pretty unlikely. I agree with you that we don't "owe" anyone belief, and that you're entitled to withhold your support for whatever reason you deem valid. I also agree that vx passports are fundamentally tyrannical and I'd like to see her be far more vocal on medical freedom. So my overall sense is that she is a person of integrity AND not someone whose political values align with mine enough that I'd feel comfortable voting for her if the opportunity arose (I don't live in Hawaii). It would depend a lot on the circumstances and the available candidates. But on the WEF thing, I'm not persuaded she's one of them. Seems far more likely they have been dishonest in their claim.
Just an FYI to file.. I got wary of Tulsi Way back when covid was starting. She said she agreed with vaccine mandates. My ears immediately picked up. I am sure the original quote is long gone from the web. She has never to my knowledge touched the subject again. I don't expect you to accept this as proof of anything...simply keep your ears open!