Excellent and very timely topic for discussion. Thank you
Hopefully, Mr. Kennedy and MAHA will get the approvals needed to open a golden opportunity for beneficial change.
Today, I came across an article covering recent study conclusions that "After age 55, people have up to a four in 10 chance of eventually developing dementia if they liv…
Excellent and very timely topic for discussion. Thank you
Hopefully, Mr. Kennedy and MAHA will get the approvals needed to open a golden opportunity for beneficial change.
Today, I came across an article covering recent study conclusions that "After age 55, people have up to a four in 10 chance of eventually developing dementia if they live long enough." The article ended with a physicians recommendation to live a healthy lifestyle.
It seems to me that many of the areas the MAHA effort has expressed interest in pursuing could impact this issue. For example, small poisonings from food enhancements. Longer-term effects from current farming practices. Better assessments of medications/"vaccines" effects.
As particulars are identified, appropriate considerations can be discussed by physicians (and support they engage ?) with their patients. Patients, thus armed, can further study and/or take beneficial actions to enhance their families' healthful progress.
For reasons I haven't surfaced, I admit to an aversion to public health and social psychology. That said, I've felt our education systems, government, and media focus on encouraging us to depend on the experts, the governments. There is no need to think for ourselves or assume responsibilities. To me, the CA LA situation personifies the strategy.
I couldn't agree more with the need for 'subsidiarity.' Major job ahead to get individuals willing to investigate, consider opportunities, and make decisions. Making decisions, being 'responsible' oft requires courage.
Excellent and very timely topic for discussion. Thank you
Hopefully, Mr. Kennedy and MAHA will get the approvals needed to open a golden opportunity for beneficial change.
Today, I came across an article covering recent study conclusions that "After age 55, people have up to a four in 10 chance of eventually developing dementia if they live long enough." The article ended with a physicians recommendation to live a healthy lifestyle.
It seems to me that many of the areas the MAHA effort has expressed interest in pursuing could impact this issue. For example, small poisonings from food enhancements. Longer-term effects from current farming practices. Better assessments of medications/"vaccines" effects.
As particulars are identified, appropriate considerations can be discussed by physicians (and support they engage ?) with their patients. Patients, thus armed, can further study and/or take beneficial actions to enhance their families' healthful progress.
For reasons I haven't surfaced, I admit to an aversion to public health and social psychology. That said, I've felt our education systems, government, and media focus on encouraging us to depend on the experts, the governments. There is no need to think for ourselves or assume responsibilities. To me, the CA LA situation personifies the strategy.
I couldn't agree more with the need for 'subsidiarity.' Major job ahead to get individuals willing to investigate, consider opportunities, and make decisions. Making decisions, being 'responsible' oft requires courage.