What is a valid reason for ‘the presence of SV40 sequences in common laboratory plasmids? Does this mean that monkey kidneys are still being used for “what”?
"The risk of false-positive results due to contamination by Common Laboratory Plasmids Containing SV40 Sequences has been underestimated. Studies of SV40 based on PCR methods require…
What is a valid reason for ‘the presence of SV40 sequences in common laboratory plasmids? Does this mean that monkey kidneys are still being used for “what”?
"The risk of false-positive results due to contamination by Common Laboratory Plasmids Containing SV40 Sequences has been underestimated. Studies of SV40 based on PCR methods require careful primer design to reduce this risk." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15451223/
And this post Reviewed by Paul A. Offit, MD on April 28, 2020, that states this “Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis that SV40 virus contained in polio vaccines administered before 1963 caused cancers.”
No, there is no SV40 virus in these preparations. Only sequence fragments, and none of these come from the Large T antigen. And Paul Offit is a pro-vaccine propagandist. Not a credible, objective source.
I wish it were possible to provide a definitive answer, but there is, no doubt, multiple mechanisms of harm responsible for the dramatic rise in cancer since the roll-out of these experimental gene-editing injections as reported by many pathologists, with SV40 being only one possibility. There is also the damage to the P53 tumor supressor gene as well as key toll-like receptors. Not sure if you've seen this article by Professor Angus Dalgleish of the UK from 9/29/23...https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
What is a valid reason for ‘the presence of SV40 sequences in common laboratory plasmids? Does this mean that monkey kidneys are still being used for “what”?
"The risk of false-positive results due to contamination by Common Laboratory Plasmids Containing SV40 Sequences has been underestimated. Studies of SV40 based on PCR methods require careful primer design to reduce this risk." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15451223/
And this post Reviewed by Paul A. Offit, MD on April 28, 2020, that states this “Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis that SV40 virus contained in polio vaccines administered before 1963 caused cancers.”
https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-ingredients/sv40
No, there is no SV40 virus in these preparations. Only sequence fragments, and none of these come from the Large T antigen. And Paul Offit is a pro-vaccine propagandist. Not a credible, objective source.
I find it difficult to trust batch-to-batch variance.. esp the potential for the intended kind
I wish it were possible to provide a definitive answer, but there is, no doubt, multiple mechanisms of harm responsible for the dramatic rise in cancer since the roll-out of these experimental gene-editing injections as reported by many pathologists, with SV40 being only one possibility. There is also the damage to the P53 tumor supressor gene as well as key toll-like receptors. Not sure if you've seen this article by Professor Angus Dalgleish of the UK from 9/29/23...https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
I will check it out. Name sounds familiar!