100%. We now have a Justice who not only can’t define what a woman is, she also believes the Gov should be allowed to censor information it deems harmful to the public. Last I read the simple black & white language of the 1st Amendment, it was for the sole purpose of denying Gov from censoring, period!
100%. We now have a Justice who not only can’t define what a woman is, she also believes the Gov should be allowed to censor information it deems harmful to the public. Last I read the simple black & white language of the 1st Amendment, it was for the sole purpose of denying Gov from censoring, period!
100%. We now have a Justice who not only can’t define what a woman is, she also believes the Gov should be allowed to censor information it deems harmful to the public. Last I read the simple black & white language of the 1st Amendment, it was for the sole purpose of denying Gov from censoring, period!